TickerGuard
Buy Day today: Good (62) Broad market participation · no major macro event
STNG

Scorpio Tankers Inc

Energy · Oil & Gas Midstream · listed since 2010

87.90$ +2.6% vs. previous close Closing price · As of: Sep 17, 2026
🔔 Watch stock
Add to watchlist

Stock Watch

Stock Watch will tell you what changes at Scorpio Tankers Inc.

Later $1 a month per stock — signing up is free, and you'll be the first to know when it launches.

Price history

Chart

Interactive price chart (TradingView).

52-week range: 49.50 $ to 87.90 $ · Last price: 87.90 $ (As of: September 17, 2026)

Key figures

Key figures at a glance

Every figure we hold for this stock, grouped by topic. The question mark next to a label explains what the number means.

Basics

Market Cap ?The value of the entire company on the market: share price times total shares outstanding. 4.4$B
Shares Outstanding ?Total number of shares issued. Price times share count gives market cap. 50m
Float ?Share of stock freely tradable on the market — not locked up in the hands of founders, insiders, or major shareholders. 77.0%
Beta ?Volatility versus the overall market: 1 = moves like the market, 2 = twice as much, under 1 = calmer than the market. -0.2

Performance

Perf. 1M ?Price performance over the last month. -5.50%
Perf. 3M ?Price performance over the last 3 months. -6.90%
Perf. 6M ?Price performance over the last 6 months. 39.00%
YTD Performance (%) ?Price performance since the start of the year (Year to Date). 62.60%
52-Week-High Distance ?How far the price sits below its highest point over the last 52 weeks. 0% means the stock is at its year high. -13.7%
Perf. 1Y ?Price performance over the last 12 months. 49.39%
Perf. 3Y ?Price performance over the last 3 years. 82.12%
Perf. 5Y ?Price performance over the last 5 years. 515.49%
Perf. 10Y ?Price performance over the last 10 years. 137.40%
Perf. Since Inception ?Price performance since the first available trading day (03/31/2010) — with a complete history, that is since the IPO. 6.49%

Technical Indicators

MA 38 Days ?Moving average of the last 38 trading days: the smoothed price path. A price above it signals short-term strength. 79.40$
MA 50 Days ?Moving average of the last 50 trading days — the most widely watched medium-term trend line. 79.10$
MA 200 Days ?Moving average of the last 200 trading days — the dividing line between a long-term uptrend and downtrend. 72.10$
RSI (14) ?Relative Strength Index over 14 days, scale 0 to 100: above 70 counts as overbought, below 30 as oversold. A hint on timing, not a verdict on the company. 72.9
Volatility 30 Days ?Price swings over the last 30 trading days, annualized. The higher the value, the more the price fluctuates. 27.1%
Volatility 250 Days ?Price swings over the last 250 trading days (roughly one market year), annualized. 35.5%

Calculated from the price history · as of 09/18/2026

Valuation

P/E ?Price-to-earnings ratio: how many years of profit does the stock cost? The lower, the cheaper the valuation. No earnings means no P/E. 8.1
Forward P/E ?P/E based on expected earnings for the next 12 months instead of past earnings — analysts' bet on the future. 16.5
PEG ?P/E divided by expected earnings growth: puts valuation in relation to growth. Around 1 is considered fair, well above that is pricey. 2.5
P/B ?Price-to-book ratio: market value relative to book equity. 1.2
P/S ?Price-to-sales ratio: market value divided by annual sales. Important for companies that aren't (yet) profitable. 4.3
EV/EBITDA ?Enterprise value including debt (EV) relative to operating profit before depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) — more comparable than P/E because debt counts too. Extreme values arise when EBITDA is near zero. 3.0
Price/FCF ?Market value divided by free cash flow: how many years of freely available cash does the stock cost? More honest than P/E because cash flow is harder to dress up. 9.5

Profitability

Gross Margin ?Gross margin: what's left of sales after only direct production costs are deducted — the product's pricing power. 73.0%
EBIT Margin ?EBIT margin: operating profit as a percentage of sales — the earning power of the core business before interest and taxes. 49.1%
Net Margin ?Net margin: what's left of sales as profit after ALL costs, interest, and taxes. 67.2%
Return on Equity ?Return on equity: how much profit does the company generate per year on shareholders' equity? 15.9%
Return on Assets ?Return on assets: how much profit the company generates from its total assets (equity and debt combined). 8.2%

Balance Sheet & Safety

Equity Ratio ?Equity ratio: equity as a share of total assets. The higher, the more resilient the balance sheet. 83.7%
Debt/Equity ?Leverage ratio: financial debt divided by equity. Under 1 is generally seen as solid; negative values mean negative equity. 0.2
Altman Z″ ?Edward Altman's bankruptcy early-warning score. We use the Z″ variant, built from four balance-sheet ratios — it is designed for service companies and non-manufacturers and uses book value instead of market value. On that scale: below 1.1 = danger zone, 2.6 and up = safe zone, in between a grey area. Because the classic Altman Z is calculated differently, the two numbers are not directly comparable. The formula does not fit banks, insurers, or real-estate stocks. fortress balance sheet 13.02
Piotroski ?Balance-sheet health check by Joseph Piotroski: 9 yes/no criteria on profit, cash flow, leverage, and efficiency. 7+ is very solid, under 3 is a red flag. 7 out of 9

Growth

Sales Growth Last Quarter ?Sales growth in the most recently reported quarter versus the same quarter a year ago (YoY). 46.20%
EPS Growth Last Quarter ?Growth in earnings per share in the most recently reported quarter versus the same quarter a year ago (YoY). 254.10%
Sales Growth (Year) ?Sales growth in the last fiscal year versus the year before. -24.58%
Forward Sales Growth ?Sales growth analysts expect over the next 12 months — an estimate, not a guarantee. -28.25%
Forward EPS Growth ?Earnings-per-share growth analysts expect over the next 12 months — an estimate, not a guarantee. -49.40%

Dividend

Dividend Yield ?Annual dividend divided by the current price: what percentage of your investment comes back as a payout each year. 2.10%
Dividend Per Share (TTM) ?Sum of dividends paid per share over the last 12 months. 1.72$
Payout Ratio ?Share of profit paid out as dividends. Over 100% means the company is paying out more than it earns — not sustainable long-term. 16.4%
Years Without a Cut ?How many years in a row the dividend hasn't been cut — a measure of reliability. 5Years
Increase Streak ?How many years in a row the dividend has been raised — the gold standard for dividend payers. 3Years

Quality & Screener

Stage ?Weinstein phases 1 through 4: 1 = basing, 2 = uptrend (the only buy phase), 3 = topping, 4 = downtrend. Measured against the 30-week line. 2
RS Rating ?Relative strength from 1 to 99: an RS of 95 means the stock has outperformed 95% of all stocks. 83
EPS Rating ?Earnings growth rating from 1 to 99 versus all stocks — high values mean above-average earnings growth. Top 10% 92
Fundamental Rating ?Our own Fundamental Rating: 0 to 100 points with an A+ to F grade. 50 points is the average across the universe, 100 the best possible score. It scores growth, earnings surprises, analyst estimates, margins, cash flow, and balance-sheet safety — every stock percentile-ranked against all others. Grades: A+ from 95, A from 75, B from 55, C from 45, D from 25, E from 5, F below. B (58 out of 100)

Highlighted are things our editorial team noticed: green = stands out as strong, red = deserves a closer look. No single metric is a verdict on its own — always read it in context.

Comparison

Industry comparison

The stock alongside the largest companies in the same group. The median row is the middle value of the companies shown above — not of the whole industry.

Industry: Oil & Gas Midstream

Industry comparison
Company Market cap ($B) P/E EV/EBITDA Gross Margin % EBIT Margin % Sales Growth (Year) % Perf. 1Y %
Scorpio Tankers Inc STNG 4.4 8.1 3.0 73.0 49.1 -24.6 49.4
Williams Companies Inc WMB 86.8 31.7 14.9 63.6 33.6 13.8 25.4
Enterprise Products Partners LP EPD 83.1 13.3 11.5 13.3 11.8 -6.4 27.7
Energy Transfer LP ET 72.6 14.4 8.2 17.5 10.4 -0.1 29.1
Kinder Morgan Inc KMI 69.0 21.5 13.1 49.4 29.9 12.5 18.1
Targa Resources Inc TRGP 60.2 29.5 14.9 43.2 20.9 3.1 74.9
MPLX LP MPLX 59.5 12.6 11.7 55.7 38.3 8.4 22.6
ONEOK Inc OKE 57.5 16.6 11.6 27.2 14.9 55.4 34.7
Cheniere Energy Inc LNG 55.8 47.4 10.4 36.9 -53.8 24.4 15.1
Median of companies shown 60.2 16.6 11.6 43.2 20.9 8.4 27.7

Based on the most recently reported figures. Only stocks from the same trading venue are lined up, so the market caps are counted in one currency. Compare in a chart →

Fiscal years

Annual Figures

Fiscal years from the audited annual reports, oldest first. EBIT is the operating profit before interest and taxes; total assets are everything the company owns.

Revenue, operating income and net income per fiscal year $M

Revenue Operating income Net income

2016 · Revenue: 523 $M 2016 · Operating income: 77 $M 2016 · Net income: -25 $M 2017 · Revenue: 513 $M 2017 · Operating income: -45 $M 2017 · Net income: -158 $M 2018 · Revenue: 585 $M 2018 · Operating income: 11 $M 2018 · Net income: -190 $M 2019 · Revenue: 704 $M 2019 · Operating income: 130 $M 2019 · Net income: -48 $M 2020 · Revenue: 916 $M 2020 · Operating income: 245 $M 2020 · Net income: 94 $M 2021 · Revenue: 541 $M 2021 · Operating income: -91 $M 2021 · Net income: -234 $M 2022 · Revenue: 1,563 $M 2022 · Operating income: 798 $M 2022 · Net income: 637 $M 2023 · Revenue: 1,341 $M 2023 · Operating income: 705 $M 2023 · Net income: 547 $M 2024 · Revenue: 1,244 $M 2024 · Operating income: 765 $M 2024 · Net income: 669 $M 2025 · Revenue: 938 $M 2025 · Operating income: 310 $M 2025 · Net income: 344 $M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Annual Figures
Fiscal Year Revenue ($M) EBIT ($M) Net Income ($M) EPS ($) Operating Cash Flow ($M) Equity ($M) Total Assets ($M)
2016 523 77 -25 -1.55 179 1,315 3,230
2017 513 -45 -158 -7.35 42 1,685 4,498
2018 585 11 -190 -5.46 58 1,839 4,784
2019 704 130 -48 -0.97 210 1,977 5,164
2020 916 245 94 1.67 419 2,066 5,159
2021 541 -91 -234 -4.28 73 1,837 5,014
2022 1,563 798 637 10.03 769 2,507 4,559
2023 1,341 705 547 10.03 865 2,554 4,229
2024 1,244 765 669 13.15 825 2,866 3,834
2025 938 310 344 7.03 491 3,199 3,918

Quarters

Quarterly Figures

Each bar is one quarter, the last one is the most recent. Use the switch to step through the individual figures.

Revenue & Profit

Cash Flow

Balance Sheet

Margins

Per Share

Click the chart or tab into it, then use ← and → to step through the periods.

None of the selected stocks reports this metric. Pick another metric or switch between annual and quarterly.

These companies report in different currencies — switch on “Indexed” or pick a margin for a fair comparison.

The figures could not be loaded right now.

Sales Per Quarter ($M)
2024: Q4 · 204.0 $M Q4 2025: Q1 · 214.0 $M Q1 2025: Q2 · 230.2 $M Q2 2025: Q3 · 241.4 $M Q3 2025: Q4 · 252.7 $M Q4 2026: Q1 · 312.9 $M Q1

Source: fundamental data

Quarterly Figures
Quarter EPS (Earnings Per Share) EPS YoY (%) Sales ($M) Sales YoY (%) Net Margin (%) OCF ($M) FCF ($M)
2024: Q4 1.43 -39.00 204 -39.40 33.60 113 74
2025: Q1 1.22 -70.40 214 -45.30 27.20 64 39
2025: Q2 1.53 -64.70 230 -39.50 31.90 128 104
2025: Q3 1.73 -45.30 241 -9.90 35.00 137 120
2025: Q4 2.59 81.60 253 23.90 50.70 165 156
2026: Q1 4.32 254.50 313 46.20 69.10 163 86

What Do These Terms Mean?

EPS (Earnings Per Share):
Quarterly profit divided by the total share count — how much of the profit works out to a single share.
YoY (Year over Year):
Change versus the same quarter a year ago — this is how you compare without seasonal distortion (e.g. the holiday shopping season).
Sales:
All revenue for the quarter, before any costs are deducted — the top line of the income statement.
Net Margin:
What percentage of sales is left over as profit in the end. Negative means the company is posting a loss.
OCF (Operating Cash Flow):
The cash that actually flows into the till from the core business during the quarter — harder to dress up than book profit.
FCF (Free Cash Flow):
Operating cash flow minus capital expenditures — the money that's genuinely free to use, say for paying down debt, buybacks, or dividends.

Compare with other stocks →

Screening

Appears in These Scanners

This stock currently matches 23 of our scanner strategies — each hit links to the scanner.

Growth

Quality & Balance Sheet

Aktien.Guide

Breakout & Setup

Dividends

Momentum & Trend

Value & GARP

Only genuine hits from verified scanners count; pure ranking metrics (P/E, P/S, and similar, which just sort the whole universe) don't count as a hit. View all scanners

Outlook

Analysts & Price Target

Combined picture of the price targets and recommendations of every analyst covering the stock. Price targets are expectations for the next 12 months, not promises — and they often follow the price rather than predict it.

Consensus Strong Sell 1 = Strong buy … 5 = Strong sell
Analyst Ratings 9
Price Target (average) 95.90$
Distance to price 9.1% The price target sits 9.1% above the current price.

Distribution of Recommendations

Strong Buy 7
Buy 1
Hold 1
Sell 0
Strong Sell 0

Estimates by Fiscal Year

Estimates by Fiscal Year
Fiscal Year EPS Estimate ($) EPS Range ($) Revenue Estimate ($M) Expected Growth Analysts
12/31/2026 11.43 9.70 – 12.98 1,207 107.5% 10
12/31/2027 5.40 2.80 – 7.46 841 -52.8% 10

Average of the analyst estimates for the coming fiscal years. The range shows how far the most optimistic and the most cautious estimate sit apart — the wider it is, the less certain the expectation.

Valuation

What is priced in?

Instead of guessing what the stock is worth, we turn the question around: what free cash flow growth has to happen for today’s market value to add up? The assumptions behind it can be moved.

Today’s market value implies roughly -7.6% growth in free cash flow per year over ten years (assumptions: discount rate 10.0%, terminal growth 2.5%).

What is priced in?
Free cash flow (last twelve months) $655.3M
Market cap $4.41B
Free cash flow in year ten $297.8M
Terminal value as a share of market value 35.6%

For comparison: over the past five years free cash flow grew by 11.2% per year.

It shows which assumption is built into today’s price, not whether that assumption will hold. Every assumption can be changed with the sliders; the figures move with them.

A simplified model calculation — not a forecast and not a recommendation.

AI classification

AI Rating

Uses AI

Scorpio Tankers setzt Künstliche Intelligenz laut Jahresbericht (20-F) für das Geschäftsjahr 2025 operativ ein — belegt in den Risikofaktoren (Item 3.D). Das Unternehmen hat KI-Technologien in mehreren Bereichen integriert (Voyage-/Reiseoptimierung, technisches Schiffsmanagement, Crew-Management), teils über Drittanbieter-SaaS-Plattformen mit KI-Funktionen, teils über intern entwickelte KI-Agenten, die operative Daten zusammenführen und auswerten; es kündigt an, den KI-Einsatz für weitere Arbeitsabläufe auszuweiten. KI ist keine Umsatzquelle (kein KI-Produkt), sondern ein internes Effizienz-/Betriebswerkzeug — daher greift Kategorie 'nutzt' (operativer Einsatz konkret belegt, keine KI-Erlöse). Ein 'bedroht'-Beleg fehlt: Der KI-Bezug in den Risikofaktoren betrifft die eigene KI-Nutzung (Fehler/Halluzinationen, Regulierung wie der EU AI Act), nicht eine KI-getriebene Bedrohung des Produktentanker-Geschäftsmodells.

View the full file — quotes, sources, reviewed filings
„We have integrated artificial intelligence ("AI") technologies across several areas of our business, including voyage optimization, technical vessel management, and crew management, through a combination of third-party SaaS platforms - some of which incorporate AI functionality at the vendor level - and internally developed AI agents used to aggregate and synthesize operational data."

Wir haben Technologien der Künstlichen Intelligenz ("KI") in mehrere Bereiche unseres Geschäfts integriert, darunter die Reiseoptimierung, das technische Schiffsmanagement und das Crew-Management - über eine Kombination aus Drittanbieter-SaaS-Plattformen, von denen einige auf Anbieterseite KI-Funktionen enthalten, und intern entwickelten KI-Agenten, die operative Daten zusammenführen und auswerten.

20-F · 2026-03-20 · View SEC filing

„We intend to expand our use of AI as additional workflows are identified for automation, though there is no guarantee such implementation will proceed as planned."

Wir beabsichtigen, unseren Einsatz von KI auszuweiten, sobald weitere Arbeitsabläufe für eine Automatisierung identifiziert werden, wobei es keine Garantie dafür gibt, dass eine solche Umsetzung wie geplant verläuft.

20-F · 2026-03-20 · View SEC filing

Filings Reviewed: 20-F 2026-03-20 · 20-F 2025-03-21 · 20-F 2024-03-22 · 6-K 2026-05-05 · 6-K 2026-07-01

Rated on July 10, 2026 · How the Rating Is Built

Earnings calls

What the Earnings Calls Reveal

Across ten calls from 2024-Q1 to 2026-Q2, Scorpio's management delivered its balance-sheet and breakeven commitments with remarkable precision: debt reduction, prepayments and cost cuts arrived exactly as announced every time. A cross-check against the original transcripts also clears management on several points that look like broken promises at first glance. The 11,500 dollar breakeven target was tied to a condition that was never met and was openly carried forward, the DHT stake was explicitly described as liquid from day one, and the rejection of VLCC purchases was a snapshot without any time horizon. Two charges hold up: the self-imposed 4.9 percent cap on DHT, which was exceeded to 5.5 percent without comment, and a clearly missed expectation for the winter of 2024/25. Add to that a deliberate, openly explained reticence on detailed questions about the use of capital.

Unremarkable pledges largely kept 10 calls reviewed, 2024-Q1 through 2026-Q2 · As of August 2, 2026

DHT: 4.9 percent cap exceeded

In 2024-Q3, President Bugbee drew a clear line: the company was stopping at 4.9 percent by design, since a 6, 7 or 8 percent holding would be too aggressive and would suggest it was no longer a passive investor. That line was crossed. After buying another 4.3 million shares the stake stood at 5.5 percent in 2025-Q2, openly disclosed in the presentation but never reconciled with the earlier statement. Two further charges do not survive a check against the transcript. No holding period was ever pledged: Bugbee said this could become a very good long-term position and added that it was like any other investment, you watch how it goes. And the stake was not reframed as tradable after the fact, because the opening remarks of that same call already called it a passive but liquid investment. It was held for roughly 14 months and sold at a 24 percent gain. What remains is the uncommented breach of a self-imposed cap.

VLCC pivot: statement without horizon

In 2024-Q3, asked about further crude exposure, Bugbee said the company did not see itself acquiring VLCCs and that there was no thought at all of doing so. A year later, in October and November 2025, Scorpio ordered two VLCC newbuildings at Hanwha, and in 2026-Q2 it added a minority interest in a joint venture covering eight VLCCs. This does not hold up as a broken pledge. The statement was a snapshot without a time horizon and came directly out of the DHT purchase: in the same breath Bugbee explained that through the DHT shares they had effectively acquired four to five VLCC equivalents at 20 percent below market price. Interest in the segment was there from the start; only the route was in question. CEO Lauro framed the pivot exactly that way in 2026-Q2: after exiting DHT they moved into physical exposure. The fair criticism is that this framing came only after the fact. The fact that the options on further VLCCs were deliberately allowed to expire in December 2025 argues against unchecked expansion.

Winter 2024/25 mis-forecast

This charge survives verification. On the 2024-Q3 call, management said rates had bottomed at high levels, that the risk was to the upside, and that Q4 and Q1 tanker earnings had consistently exceeded Q3 over the past 30 years, adding they expected that to continue. The opposite happened. Adjusted EBITDA fell from 166 million dollars in 2024-Q3 to 105 million in 2024-Q4, the weakest quarter of the entire review period, and at 123 million it was still clearly below in 2025-Q1. On the February call, analyst Jon Chappell noted rates had been below prior-year levels for six months. What does not hold up is the reading of a covert tone shift: Bugbee announced his unusually structured opening remarks himself, saying he wanted to separate what was known from what was speculative, and the analyst who called them the most scripted he had ever heard explicitly added that they were very helpful. Nor did Bugbee retract a high-rate forecast of his own; he rejected an analyst's hypothesis, adding that it had never been their forecast.

Capital allocation: details withheld

On tactical questions about the use of capital, management does stonewall. In 2024-Q2, Bugbee refused to say how the buybacks were being funded, stating the market would get no read at all, and deflected a question about adjacent segments with a curt deferral. In 2025-Q2, CFO Avella explicitly declined to set out a long-term capital allocation strategy amid the prevailing uncertainty, and in 2025-Q3 the question of buyback timing was passed on verbatim. Two of the originally cited examples do not hold. In 2024-Q3 no leverage target was withheld; on the contrary, Bugbee named it explicitly as net debt around the scrap value of the fleet and declined only further detail. And the deflection of scenario questions in 2026-Q1 concerned geopolitical market assumptions, not the use of capital. Conversely, management repeatedly volunteered the framework: no special dividend, no payout tied to a share of income, no corporate acquisitions, no overnight bulk order. What stays open is timing and size, not direction.

Counterweight: financial pledges all met

On hard, datable financial pledges the record is spotless. The prepayment of up to 223 million dollars announced in 2024-Q1 together with the 12,500 dollar breakeven was executed in 2024-Q2, and the 154.6 million dollar prepayment promised in 2025-Q3 with the reduction to roughly 11,000 dollars was confirmed in 2025-Q4. Net debt fell from 2.9 billion dollars at the end of 2021 to a net cash position of 1.3 billion in 2026-Q2. The 2025-Q3 market call that conditions would stay very strong into the first quarter of 2026 came true: after five consecutive quarters of rising rates through 2025-Q4, adjusted EBITDA rose further to 214 million dollars in 2026-Q1 and 300.5 million in 2026-Q2, the strongest quarter in company history. The frequently cited 11,500 dollar breakeven target from 2024-Q2 is not a broken promise either: it was explicitly tied to full repayment of two facilities, only one of which was retired, and the CFO openly quantified the remaining effect at almost 850 dollars per day as early as 2024-Q3.

Management promises

  • 2024-Q1 — Prepayment of up to 223 million dollars on the 1 billion credit facility to lower the daily cash breakeven to 12,500 dollars. Executed in 2024-Q2: about 400 million dollars of debt repaid, breakeven at 12,500 dollars as announced. kept
  • 2024-Q3 — DHT stake deliberately capped at 4.9 percent in order to remain identifiable as a passive investor. After buying another 4.3 million shares the stake stood at 5.5 percent in 2025-Q2, openly disclosed but never reconciled with the pledge. No holding period was ever promised: the position ran roughly 14 months and was sold at a 24 percent gain. broken
  • 2025-Q3 — Prepayment of 154.6 million dollars in the fourth quarter of 2025, lowering the cash breakeven to roughly 11,000 dollars per day. Confirmed in 2025-Q4: prepayment executed, breakeven at roughly 11,000 dollars, unchanged at that level in 2026-Q2. kept
  • 2026-Q1 — Renewed review of a dividend increase in July or September 2026. On the July call (2026-Q2) the dividend stayed at 0.45 dollars without an increase; the September window is still open. open

Based on public earnings call transcripts. Reviewed: 10 transcripts 2024-Q1 through 2026-Q2.

Growth

Growth Score

Ten checks against the annual reports — each one passed counts a point.

4 of 10 Weak growth
  • Revenue grows by more than 15% a year over three years -15.6%
  • More than 10% revenue growth is expected for the coming year -28.3%
  • Share count grows by less than 3% a year -8.3%
  • Revenue growth plus cash-flow margin add up to at least 40 ("Rule of 40") 19.9%
  • Gross margin at 40% or higher and without meaningful erosion 46.2%
  • Goodwill from acquisitions does not grow faster than revenue 0.2%
  • Net debt below twice EBITDA 133 m net cash
  • Operating cash flow covers the profits of the last three years 622 m
  • Return on capital at 15% or higher, or up versus two years ago 8.2%
  • Insiders hold at least 10% or are net buyers 12.8%

A criterion without figures counts neither as passed nor as failed; a score is only produced from 7 judgeable criteria upwards. Source: fundamental data. All ten criteria in detail

Quality check

AAQS

3/10

The AAQS (AlleAktien Quality Score) checks 10 quality criteria on growth, profitability, and balance-sheet strength — per the methodology developed and published by AlleAktien, calculated by us from our own fundamental data. A stock counts as a quality stock from 9 out of 10 points. Where a company has a shorter listing history, we calculate over the fiscal years available (at least five).

  • Sales growth 10Y > 5% 6.7%
  • Exp. sales growth 3Y > 5% -5.3%
  • EBIT growth 10Y > 5% 16.8%
  • Exp. EBIT growth 3Y > 5% -12.4%
  • Net debt < 4x EBIT -0.4x
  • EBIT positive, 10Y straight 8
  • Max. EBIT decline < 50% 100.0%
  • Return on equity > 15% 10.8%
  • ROCE > 15% 8.2%
  • Expected return > 10% -4.1%

View stocks with the full AAQS score · Read the methodology at AlleAktien

Source: fundamental data

Insiders

Insider Transactions

Reportable transactions by officers and major shareholders from SEC Form 4 filings. "Other" includes things like stock grants and option exercises without a buy/sell character.

Insider Transactions
Date Person Role Type Shares Price Value
Jul 10, 2026 Camerana Niccolo Director Sell 2,500 191,325.00 478,312,500

View all insider transactions →

The company

About the Company

Scorpio Tankers Inc. befasst sich gemeinsam mit ihren Tochtergesellschaften weltweit mit dem Seetransport von Rohöl und raffinierten Erdölprodukten.

Employees
24
Headquarters
Monaco, Monaco
Address
99 Boulevard du Jardin Exotique, 98000 Monaco, Monaco
Phone
377 9798 5716
IPO Date
03/31/2010
ISIN
MHY7542C1306
Stock Split
1:10 on 01/18/2019

Management

Management
Name Title Birth Year
Emanuele A. Lauro Founder, Chairman & CEO 1978
Robert L. Bugbee President & Director 1960
Christopher Avella Chief Financial Officer 1980
Cameron Mackey Chief Operating Officer 1968
James Doyle Head of Corporate Development & Investor Relations
Auste Adelborg Secretary 1991
Lars Dencker Nielsen Commercial Director
David Rodney Morant Managing Director - Scorpio UK

Executives per the latest required filings; titles kept in their original language. Source: fundamental data.

Data as of: September 17, 2026 · Source: fundamental data & SEC filings (annual and quarterly reports, 10-K/10-Q)

Note: pure fact-based analysis, not investment advice and not a solicitation to buy or sell. All figures without guarantee.

Was this page helpful to you?