Scorpio Tankers Inc (STNG)
🔔 Watch stock
Stock Watch
Stock Watch will tell you what changes at Scorpio Tankers Inc.
Later $1 a month per stock — signing up is free, and you'll be the first to know when it launches.
Appears in These Scanners
This stock currently matches 24 of our scanner strategies — each hit links to the scanner.
Only genuine hits from verified scanners count; pure ranking metrics (P/E, P/S, and similar, which just sort the whole universe) don't count as a hit. View all scanners
Trading Day
Key levels of the most recently completed trading day — not a live quote.
52-Week Range
Current price 77.90 $ — 80% of the range above the low.
Lowest and highest closing price over the last 52 weeks. The marker shows where the current price sits within that range: close to the high speaks for strength, close to the low for weakness.
Basics
Performance
Technical Indicators
Calculated from the price history · as of 08/03/2026
Valuation
Profitability
Balance Sheet & Safety
Growth
Dividend
Quality & Screener
AI Rating
Uses AIScorpio Tankers setzt Künstliche Intelligenz laut Jahresbericht (20-F) für das Geschäftsjahr 2025 operativ ein — belegt in den Risikofaktoren (Item 3.D). Das Unternehmen hat KI-Technologien in mehreren Bereichen integriert (Voyage-/Reiseoptimierung, technisches Schiffsmanagement, Crew-Management), teils über Drittanbieter-SaaS-Plattformen mit KI-Funktionen, teils über intern entwickelte KI-Agenten, die operative Daten zusammenführen und auswerten; es kündigt an, den KI-Einsatz für weitere Arbeitsabläufe auszuweiten. KI ist keine Umsatzquelle (kein KI-Produkt), sondern ein internes Effizienz-/Betriebswerkzeug — daher greift Kategorie 'nutzt' (operativer Einsatz konkret belegt, keine KI-Erlöse). Ein 'bedroht'-Beleg fehlt: Der KI-Bezug in den Risikofaktoren betrifft die eigene KI-Nutzung (Fehler/Halluzinationen, Regulierung wie der EU AI Act), nicht eine KI-getriebene Bedrohung des Produktentanker-Geschäftsmodells.
View the full file — quotes, sources, reviewed filings
„We have integrated artificial intelligence ("AI") technologies across several areas of our business, including voyage optimization, technical vessel management, and crew management, through a combination of third-party SaaS platforms - some of which incorporate AI functionality at the vendor level - and internally developed AI agents used to aggregate and synthesize operational data."
Wir haben Technologien der Künstlichen Intelligenz ("KI") in mehrere Bereiche unseres Geschäfts integriert, darunter die Reiseoptimierung, das technische Schiffsmanagement und das Crew-Management - über eine Kombination aus Drittanbieter-SaaS-Plattformen, von denen einige auf Anbieterseite KI-Funktionen enthalten, und intern entwickelten KI-Agenten, die operative Daten zusammenführen und auswerten.
„We intend to expand our use of AI as additional workflows are identified for automation, though there is no guarantee such implementation will proceed as planned."
Wir beabsichtigen, unseren Einsatz von KI auszuweiten, sobald weitere Arbeitsabläufe für eine Automatisierung identifiziert werden, wobei es keine Garantie dafür gibt, dass eine solche Umsetzung wie geplant verläuft.
Filings Reviewed: 20-F 2026-03-20 · 20-F 2025-03-21 · 20-F 2024-03-22 · 6-K 2026-05-05 · 6-K 2026-07-01
Rated on July 10, 2026 · How the Rating Is Built
What the Earnings Calls Reveal
Unremarkable pledges largely keptAcross ten calls from 2024-Q1 to 2026-Q2, Scorpio's management delivered its balance-sheet and breakeven commitments with remarkable precision: debt reduction, prepayments and cost cuts arrived exactly as announced every time. A cross-check against the original transcripts also clears management on several points that look like broken promises at first glance. The 11,500 dollar breakeven target was tied to a condition that was never met and was openly carried forward, the DHT stake was explicitly described as liquid from day one, and the rejection of VLCC purchases was a snapshot without any time horizon. Two charges hold up: the self-imposed 4.9 percent cap on DHT, which was exceeded to 5.5 percent without comment, and a clearly missed expectation for the winter of 2024/25. Add to that a deliberate, openly explained reticence on detailed questions about the use of capital.
10 calls reviewed, 2024-Q1 through 2026-Q2 · As of August 2, 2026
DHT: 4.9 percent cap exceeded
In 2024-Q3, President Bugbee drew a clear line: the company was stopping at 4.9 percent by design, since a 6, 7 or 8 percent holding would be too aggressive and would suggest it was no longer a passive investor. That line was crossed. After buying another 4.3 million shares the stake stood at 5.5 percent in 2025-Q2, openly disclosed in the presentation but never reconciled with the earlier statement. Two further charges do not survive a check against the transcript. No holding period was ever pledged: Bugbee said this could become a very good long-term position and added that it was like any other investment, you watch how it goes. And the stake was not reframed as tradable after the fact, because the opening remarks of that same call already called it a passive but liquid investment. It was held for roughly 14 months and sold at a 24 percent gain. What remains is the uncommented breach of a self-imposed cap.
VLCC pivot: statement without horizon
In 2024-Q3, asked about further crude exposure, Bugbee said the company did not see itself acquiring VLCCs and that there was no thought at all of doing so. A year later, in October and November 2025, Scorpio ordered two VLCC newbuildings at Hanwha, and in 2026-Q2 it added a minority interest in a joint venture covering eight VLCCs. This does not hold up as a broken pledge. The statement was a snapshot without a time horizon and came directly out of the DHT purchase: in the same breath Bugbee explained that through the DHT shares they had effectively acquired four to five VLCC equivalents at 20 percent below market price. Interest in the segment was there from the start; only the route was in question. CEO Lauro framed the pivot exactly that way in 2026-Q2: after exiting DHT they moved into physical exposure. The fair criticism is that this framing came only after the fact. The fact that the options on further VLCCs were deliberately allowed to expire in December 2025 argues against unchecked expansion.
Winter 2024/25 mis-forecast
This charge survives verification. On the 2024-Q3 call, management said rates had bottomed at high levels, that the risk was to the upside, and that Q4 and Q1 tanker earnings had consistently exceeded Q3 over the past 30 years, adding they expected that to continue. The opposite happened. Adjusted EBITDA fell from 166 million dollars in 2024-Q3 to 105 million in 2024-Q4, the weakest quarter of the entire review period, and at 123 million it was still clearly below in 2025-Q1. On the February call, analyst Jon Chappell noted rates had been below prior-year levels for six months. What does not hold up is the reading of a covert tone shift: Bugbee announced his unusually structured opening remarks himself, saying he wanted to separate what was known from what was speculative, and the analyst who called them the most scripted he had ever heard explicitly added that they were very helpful. Nor did Bugbee retract a high-rate forecast of his own; he rejected an analyst's hypothesis, adding that it had never been their forecast.
Capital allocation: details withheld
On tactical questions about the use of capital, management does stonewall. In 2024-Q2, Bugbee refused to say how the buybacks were being funded, stating the market would get no read at all, and deflected a question about adjacent segments with a curt deferral. In 2025-Q2, CFO Avella explicitly declined to set out a long-term capital allocation strategy amid the prevailing uncertainty, and in 2025-Q3 the question of buyback timing was passed on verbatim. Two of the originally cited examples do not hold. In 2024-Q3 no leverage target was withheld; on the contrary, Bugbee named it explicitly as net debt around the scrap value of the fleet and declined only further detail. And the deflection of scenario questions in 2026-Q1 concerned geopolitical market assumptions, not the use of capital. Conversely, management repeatedly volunteered the framework: no special dividend, no payout tied to a share of income, no corporate acquisitions, no overnight bulk order. What stays open is timing and size, not direction.
Counterweight: financial pledges all met
On hard, datable financial pledges the record is spotless. The prepayment of up to 223 million dollars announced in 2024-Q1 together with the 12,500 dollar breakeven was executed in 2024-Q2, and the 154.6 million dollar prepayment promised in 2025-Q3 with the reduction to roughly 11,000 dollars was confirmed in 2025-Q4. Net debt fell from 2.9 billion dollars at the end of 2021 to a net cash position of 1.3 billion in 2026-Q2. The 2025-Q3 market call that conditions would stay very strong into the first quarter of 2026 came true: after five consecutive quarters of rising rates through 2025-Q4, adjusted EBITDA rose further to 214 million dollars in 2026-Q1 and 300.5 million in 2026-Q2, the strongest quarter in company history. The frequently cited 11,500 dollar breakeven target from 2024-Q2 is not a broken promise either: it was explicitly tied to full repayment of two facilities, only one of which was retired, and the CFO openly quantified the remaining effect at almost 850 dollars per day as early as 2024-Q3.
Management promises
-
2024-Q1 kept
Prepayment of up to 223 million dollars on the 1 billion credit facility to lower the daily cash breakeven to 12,500 dollars.
Executed in 2024-Q2: about 400 million dollars of debt repaid, breakeven at 12,500 dollars as announced.
-
2024-Q3 broken
DHT stake deliberately capped at 4.9 percent in order to remain identifiable as a passive investor.
After buying another 4.3 million shares the stake stood at 5.5 percent in 2025-Q2, openly disclosed but never reconciled with the pledge. No holding period was ever promised: the position ran roughly 14 months and was sold at a 24 percent gain.
-
2025-Q3 kept
Prepayment of 154.6 million dollars in the fourth quarter of 2025, lowering the cash breakeven to roughly 11,000 dollars per day.
Confirmed in 2025-Q4: prepayment executed, breakeven at roughly 11,000 dollars, unchanged at that level in 2026-Q2.
-
2026-Q1 open
Renewed review of a dividend increase in July or September 2026.
On the July call (2026-Q2) the dividend stayed at 0.45 dollars without an increase; the September window is still open.
Based on public earnings call transcripts. Reviewed: 10 transcripts 2024-Q1 through 2026-Q2.
Growth Score
4 of 10 Weak growthTen checks against the annual reports — each one passed counts a point.
- Revenue grows by more than 15% a year over three years -15.6% failed
- More than 10% revenue growth is expected for the coming year -28.3% failed
- Share count grows by less than 3% a year -8.3% passed
- Revenue growth plus cash-flow margin add up to at least 40 ("Rule of 40") 19.9% failed
- Gross margin at 40% or higher and without meaningful erosion 46.2% failed
- Goodwill from acquisitions does not grow faster than revenue 0.2% failed
- Net debt below twice EBITDA 133 m net cash passed
- Operating cash flow covers the profits of the last three years 622 m passed
- Return on capital at 15% or higher, or up versus two years ago 8.2% failed
- Insiders hold at least 10% or are net buyers 12.8% passed
A criterion without figures counts neither as passed nor as failed; a score is only produced from 7 judgeable criteria upwards. Source: fundamental data. All ten criteria in detail
Highlighted are things our editorial team noticed: green = stands out as strong, red = deserves a closer look. No single metric is a verdict on its own — always read it in context.
Analysts & Price Target
The price target sits 23.6% above the current price.
- Consensus
- Strong Sell
- Analyst Ratings
- 9
Combined picture of the price targets and recommendations of every analyst covering the stock. Price targets are expectations for the next 12 months, not promises — and they often follow the price rather than predict it.
Estimates by Fiscal Year
| Fiscal Year | EPS Estimate ($) | EPS Range ($) | Revenue Estimate ($M) | Expected Growth | Analysts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12/31/2026 | 11.37 | 10.05 – 12.98 | 1,219 | 106.4% | 8 |
| 12/31/2027 | 5.94 | 2.79 – 7.46 | 852 | -47.8% | 10 |
Average of the analyst estimates for the coming fiscal years. The range shows how far the most optimistic and the most cautious estimate sit apart — the wider it is, the less certain the expectation.
Revenue & Profit
Cash Flow
Balance Sheet
Margins
Per Share
Click the chart or tab into it, then use ← and → to step through the periods.
None of the selected stocks reports this metric. Pick another metric or switch between annual and quarterly.
· Total · per year
These companies report in different currencies — switch on “Indexed” or pick a margin for a fair comparison.
The figures could not be loaded right now.
Source: fundamental data
Quarterly Figures
| Quarter | EPS (Earnings Per Share) | EPS YoY (%) | Sales ($M) | Sales YoY (%) | Net Margin (%) | OCF ($M) | FCF ($M) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024: Q4 | 1.43 | -39.00 | 204 | -39.40 | 33.60 | 113 | 74 |
| 2025: Q1 | 1.22 | -70.40 | 214 | -45.30 | 27.20 | 64 | 39 |
| 2025: Q2 | 1.53 | -64.70 | 230 | -39.50 | 31.90 | 128 | 104 |
| 2025: Q3 | 1.73 | -45.30 | 241 | -9.90 | 35.00 | 137 | 120 |
| 2025: Q4 | 2.59 | 81.60 | 253 | 23.90 | 50.70 | 165 | 156 |
| 2026: Q1 | 4.32 | 254.50 | 313 | 46.20 | 69.10 | 163 | 86 |
- EPS (Earnings Per Share):
- Quarterly profit divided by the total share count — how much of the profit works out to a single share.
- YoY (Year over Year):
- Change versus the same quarter a year ago — this is how you compare without seasonal distortion (e.g. the holiday shopping season).
- Sales:
- All revenue for the quarter, before any costs are deducted — the top line of the income statement.
- Net Margin:
- What percentage of sales is left over as profit in the end. Negative means the company is posting a loss.
- OCF (Operating Cash Flow):
- The cash that actually flows into the till from the core business during the quarter — harder to dress up than book profit.
- FCF (Free Cash Flow):
- Operating cash flow minus capital expenditures — the money that's genuinely free to use, say for paying down debt, buybacks, or dividends.
Annual Figures
| Fiscal Year | Revenue ($M) | EBIT ($M) | Net Income ($M) | EPS ($) | Operating Cash Flow ($M) | Equity ($M) | Total Assets ($M) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 523 | 77 | -25 | -1.55 | 179 | 1,315 | 3,230 |
| 2017 | 513 | -45 | -158 | -7.35 | 42 | 1,685 | 4,498 |
| 2018 | 585 | 11 | -190 | -5.46 | 58 | 1,839 | 4,784 |
| 2019 | 704 | 130 | -48 | -0.97 | 210 | 1,977 | 5,164 |
| 2020 | 916 | 245 | 94 | 1.67 | 419 | 2,066 | 5,159 |
| 2021 | 541 | -91 | -234 | -4.28 | 73 | 1,837 | 5,014 |
| 2022 | 1,563 | 798 | 637 | 10.03 | 769 | 2,507 | 4,559 |
| 2023 | 1,341 | 705 | 547 | 10.03 | 865 | 2,554 | 4,229 |
| 2024 | 1,244 | 765 | 669 | 13.15 | 825 | 2,866 | 3,834 |
| 2025 | 938 | 310 | 344 | 7.03 | 491 | 3,199 | 3,918 |
Fiscal years from the audited annual reports, oldest first. EBIT is the operating profit before interest and taxes; total assets are everything the company owns.
About the Company
Scorpio Tankers Inc. befasst sich gemeinsam mit ihren Tochtergesellschaften weltweit mit dem Seetransport von Rohöl und raffinierten Erdölprodukten.
| Employees | 24 |
|---|---|
| Headquarters | Monaco, Monaco |
| Address | 99 Boulevard du Jardin Exotique, 98000 Monaco, Monaco |
| Phone | 377 9798 5716 |
| Website | scorpiotankers.com |
| IPO Date | 31. Mar 2010 |
| ISIN | MHY7542C1306 |
| Stock Split | 1:10 on 01/18/2019 |
Management
| Name | Title | Birth Year |
|---|---|---|
| Emanuele A. Lauro | Founder, Chairman & CEO | 1978 |
| Robert L. Bugbee | President & Director | 1960 |
| Christopher Avella | Chief Financial Officer | 1980 |
| Cameron Mackey | Chief Operating Officer | 1968 |
| James Doyle | Head of Corporate Development & Investor Relations | – |
| Auste Adelborg | Secretary | 1991 |
| Lars Dencker Nielsen | Commercial Director | – |
| David Rodney Morant | Managing Director - Scorpio UK | – |
Executives per the latest required filings; titles kept in their original language. Source: fundamental data.
Insider Transactions
| Date | Person | Role | Type | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10. Jul 2026 | Camerana Niccolo | Director | Sell | 2,500 | 191,325.00 | 478,312,500 |
Reportable transactions by officers and major shareholders from SEC Form 4 filings. "Other" includes things like stock grants and option exercises without a buy/sell character.
View all insider transactions →Chart
Interactive price chart (TradingView).
Data as of: July 31, 2026 · Source: fundamental data & SEC filings (annual and quarterly reports, 10-K/10-Q)
Note: pure fact-based analysis, not investment advice and not a solicitation to buy or sell. All figures without guarantee.