TickerGuard
Buy Day today: Good (62) Broad market participation · no major macro event
AMN

AMN Healthcare Services Inc

Healthcare · Medical Care Facilities · listed since 2001

34.60$ -1.1% vs. previous close Closing price · As of: Sep 17, 2026
🔔 Watch stock
Add to watchlist

Assessment

Our Rating

A journalistic assessment by our editorial team at the time of the deep dive — it rates the company, not the entry point. Not investment advice and not a solicitation to buy or sell.

Open questions

The business works in principle, but one material question is open. As long as it stays open, our findings do not carry a quality verdict.

Why this colour

After the materiality gate, none of the negative findings is an existential finding: the company is intact — 2025 revenue ($2.73 billion) even sits above the pre-COVID level of 2020 ($2.39 billion), operating income is positive again, so is cash flow, net debt has been cut from more than a billion to $769 million, and the credit covenants are met. A red light — "Substance risk", which would signal a solvency question — would therefore be overdrawn. At the same time the quality is not confirmed either, and what is missing is operational: the turnaround remains unproven — consensus expects another roughly 20 percent less revenue, and core demand (travel nurses) actually declined. The many scanner hits do not close that gap; clustered and same-direction as they are, they measure a price rebound plus a one-time strike quarter, and findings of that kind never determine the color. What is left standing is the missing proof of an operational turn — amber, "Open questions". About the entry price the traffic light says nothing; that is what the metric scanners are for. The resolving evidence is concrete and observable soon: the first quarters without the strike effect. Exactly that — plus core demand and a possible further goodwill test in the technology segment — is what matters before the recovery becomes an upswing. The decision is yours.

What the thesis turns on

Assessment: Opportunities & Risks

AMN Healthcare delivers the strongest scanner finding of our series — 31 hits at once. Yet the many green lights measure the same price rebound off the low plus a one-time strike quarter, not a turnaround. The hospital staffing firm's business has shrunk 48 percent since the 2022 COVID peak (from $5.24 billion to $2.73 billion), 2024 and 2025 brought losses, and consensus expects another roughly 20 percent less revenue. The Q1 2026 jump to $1.38 billion came almost entirely from "unpredictable" strike assignments. Add written-off and still-looming goodwill, a 22-percent customer and more expensive money. A momentum stock with an honest rebound chart, but without a proven operating upswing. Not investment advice.

Turnaround or base effect?

Clearly a base effect: revenue fell from the 2022 COVID peak ($5.24 billion) to $2.73 billion in 2025 (−48 percent), 2024 and 2025 brought net losses of $147.0 million and $95.7 million, and consensus expects another roughly 20 percent revenue decline. Operating income is narrowly positive again, but the business keeps retreating.

Earnings quality & the Q1 2026 jump

The revenue jump to $1.38 billion in the first quarter of 2026 stems almost entirely from one-time hospital strikes (labor disruption $721.9 million instead of $38.6 million). Without the one-off, the base business sat at roughly $656 million — at shrinking prior-quarter level; demand for travel nurses actually declined. AMN itself calls such events "unpredictable".

Balance sheet: goodwill & debt

The burdens of the boom years: $546.9 million of goodwill already written off, $755.8 million (roughly 118 percent of equity) remaining — the largest chunk in the shrinking technology segment. Net debt roughly $769 million; more expensive refinancing (6.5 instead of 4.625 percent) and a credit covenant loosened to 5.25 times.

Scanner / momentum signal

The momentum is real: the stock has roughly doubled in half a year and hits 31 scanners at once — the strongest confluence finding of the series. But the many hits measure the same price rebound plus one strike quarter, not 31 independent truths. A momentum filter measures price behavior, not a business model.

Valuation & price

Optically cheap (price-to-sales roughly 0.36, EV/EBITDA roughly 7.8), but no classic trailing P/E because of the net loss; forward P/E roughly 26. The low price-to-sales ratio mirrors an expected shrinking revenue base — the price of uncertainty, not a safe discount. In the boom years 2022/2023, AMN bought back roughly one billion dollars of shares at prices around $100.

Worth Noting

Materiality gate (July 10, 2026) — finding by finding: (1) business decline/base effect: revenue −48 percent since the 2022 COVID peak, but 2025 above the pre-COVID level of 2020, operating income +$33 million, cash flow positive → cyclical price finding, no existential finding (company intact). (2) Q1 2026 strike one-off ($721.9 million instead of $38.6 million): earnings/signal quality, no solvency question → price finding. (3) Goodwill $755.8 million (~118 percent of equity): a further impairment would be non-cash and triggers no covenant → balance-sheet-quality price finding. (4) Net debt $769 million: the banks loosened the net-leverage covenant via the Fifth Amendment (10/2025) temporarily to 5.25× (step-down to 5.00× from 04/2027, 4.75× from 07/2028) but simultaneously reduced the credit line from $750 to $450 million and made it more expensive above 4.25× leverage. Decisive for the gate: NO buyback/dividend blocker ("covenants otherwise remained unchanged"), no going concern, ~$404.8 million of the line available → bearable, an amber flag, no existential finding. (5) Customer concentration Kaiser 22 percent: per the gate calibration (21 percent = dent) a dent; the company would remain intact → concentration-risk dent. Result: no existential finding — the substance carries: no going concern, cash flow positive, NO buyback/dividend blocker, ~$404.8 million of the line available. What is not settled is the operating side: the turn is not proven in the numbers, goodwill of $755.8 million (~118 percent of equity) keeps balance-sheet quality open, the credit line was cut from $750 to $450 million and made more expensive above 4.25× leverage, and Kaiser at 22 percent stays a dent → amber, "Open questions". What would resolve them are the strike-free quarterly numbers. The price and cycle findings remain findings in their own right, but they do not set the colour — about the entry price the traffic light says nothing; that is what the metric scanners are for.

Price and valuation figures dated mid-2026; analyses are evergreen, daily prices are not a buy argument. The market value of roughly $1.2 billion refers to roughly 38.8 million shares outstanding; the stock has roughly doubled in half a year but still trades roughly three quarters below its all-time high.

Revenue/earnings series from the annual and quarterly reports (10-K/10-Q): 2022: $5.24 billion / +$444 million; 2023: $3.79 billion / +$211 million; 2024: $2.98 billion / −$147 million; 2025: $2.73 billion / −$96 million. Operating income 2025 was positive at +$33 million; the net loss arose from goodwill impairment ($109.5 million) and interest.

Special-situations screening (EDGAR): no ongoing takeover, no strategic review, no rights plan, no Nasdaq/NYSE notice. Only passive large-holder filings (SC 13G / SC 13G/A), no activist SC 13D. The CEO transition to Caroline Grace is long completed; the 8-Ks concerned routine matters (conference, by-law update under Delaware law, bond refinancing, quarterly results).

AI classification: threatened. In its risk factors AMN concretely names the growing adoption of AI as a danger to its own staffing model (clients could plan better internally with AI and reduce the need for intermediaries; AI could reduce demand for the services). AI is no proven revenue source of its own; internally it is used for efficiency. Under the precedence rule, the threat prevails.

Stock Watch

This analysis is as of August 4, 2026. Stock Watch will tell you what's changed at AMN since then.

Later $1 a month per stock — signing up is free, and you'll be the first to know when it launches.

Price history

Chart

Interactive price chart (TradingView).

52-week range: 15.10 $ to 36.60 $ · Last price: 34.60 $ (As of: September 17, 2026)

Key figures

Key figures at a glance

Every figure we hold for this stock, grouped by topic. The question mark next to a label explains what the number means.

Basics

Market Cap ?The value of the entire company on the market: share price times total shares outstanding. 1.3$B
Shares Outstanding ?Total number of shares issued. Price times share count gives market cap. 39m
Float ?Share of stock freely tradable on the market — not locked up in the hands of founders, insiders, or major shareholders. 99.0%
Beta ?Volatility versus the overall market: 1 = moves like the market, 2 = twice as much, under 1 = calmer than the market. 0.4

Performance

Perf. 1M ?Price performance over the last month. 15.90%
Perf. 3M ?Price performance over the last 3 months. 71.20%
Perf. 6M ?Price performance over the last 6 months. 102.20%
YTD Performance (%) ?Price performance since the start of the year (Year to Date). 98.20%
52-Week-High Distance ?How far the price sits below its highest point over the last 52 weeks. 0% means the stock is at its year high. -2.4%
Perf. 1Y ?Price performance over the last 12 months. 81.75%
Perf. 3Y ?Price performance over the last 3 years. -60.77%
Perf. 5Y ?Price performance over the last 5 years. -69.18%
Perf. 10Y ?Price performance over the last 10 years. -0.55%
Perf. Since Inception ?Price performance since the first available trading day (11/13/2001) — with a complete history, that is since the IPO. 148.80%

Technical Indicators

MA 38 Days ?Moving average of the last 38 trading days: the smoothed price path. A price above it signals short-term strength. 34.10$
MA 50 Days ?Moving average of the last 50 trading days — the most widely watched medium-term trend line. 33.90$
MA 200 Days ?Moving average of the last 200 trading days — the dividing line between a long-term uptrend and downtrend. 24.90$
RSI (14) ?Relative Strength Index over 14 days, scale 0 to 100: above 70 counts as overbought, below 30 as oversold. A hint on timing, not a verdict on the company. 53.5
Volatility 30 Days ?Price swings over the last 30 trading days, annualized. The higher the value, the more the price fluctuates. 65.0%
Volatility 250 Days ?Price swings over the last 250 trading days (roughly one market year), annualized. 65.0%

Calculated from the price history · as of 09/18/2026

Valuation

P/E ?Price-to-earnings ratio: how many years of profit does the stock cost? The lower, the cheaper the valuation. No earnings means no P/E.
Forward P/E ?P/E based on expected earnings for the next 12 months instead of past earnings — analysts' bet on the future. 18.0
PEG ?P/E divided by expected earnings growth: puts valuation in relation to growth. Around 1 is considered fair, well above that is pricey. 1.7
P/B ?Price-to-book ratio: market value relative to book equity.
P/S ?Price-to-sales ratio: market value divided by annual sales. Important for companies that aren't (yet) profitable. 0.4
EV/EBITDA ?Enterprise value including debt (EV) relative to operating profit before depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) — more comparable than P/E because debt counts too. Extreme values arise when EBITDA is near zero. 5.0
Price/FCF ?Market value divided by free cash flow: how many years of freely available cash does the stock cost? More honest than P/E because cash flow is harder to dress up. 3.0

Profitability

Gross Margin ?Gross margin: what's left of sales after only direct production costs are deducted — the product's pricing power. 27.8%
EBIT Margin ?EBIT margin: operating profit as a percentage of sales — the earning power of the core business before interest and taxes.
Net Margin ?Net margin: what's left of sales as profit after ALL costs, interest, and taxes. 3.1%
Return on Equity ?Return on equity: how much profit does the company generate per year on shareholders' equity? -4.5%
Return on Assets ?Return on assets: how much profit the company generates from its total assets (equity and debt combined). 4.4%

Balance Sheet & Safety

Equity Ratio ?Equity ratio: equity as a share of total assets. The higher, the more resilient the balance sheet.
Debt/Equity ?Leverage ratio: financial debt divided by equity. Under 1 is generally seen as solid; negative values mean negative equity.
Altman Z″ ?Edward Altman's bankruptcy early-warning score. We use the Z″ variant, built from four balance-sheet ratios — it is designed for service companies and non-manufacturers and uses book value instead of market value. On that scale: below 1.1 = danger zone, 2.6 and up = safe zone, in between a grey area. Because the classic Altman Z is calculated differently, the two numbers are not directly comparable. The formula does not fit banks, insurers, or real-estate stocks. 5.60
Piotroski ?Balance-sheet health check by Joseph Piotroski: 9 yes/no criteria on profit, cash flow, leverage, and efficiency. 7+ is very solid, under 3 is a red flag. very solid 8 out of 9

Growth

Sales Growth Last Quarter ?Sales growth in the most recently reported quarter versus the same quarter a year ago (YoY). 99.90%
EPS Growth Last Quarter ?Growth in earnings per share in the most recently reported quarter versus the same quarter a year ago (YoY). 321.30%
Sales Growth (Year) ?Sales growth in the last fiscal year versus the year before. -8.49%
Forward Sales Growth ?Sales growth analysts expect over the next 12 months — an estimate, not a guarantee. -19.88%
Forward EPS Growth ?Earnings-per-share growth analysts expect over the next 12 months — an estimate, not a guarantee.

Dividend

This stock currently pays no dividend.

Quality & Screener

Stage ?Weinstein phases 1 through 4: 1 = basing, 2 = uptrend (the only buy phase), 3 = topping, 4 = downtrend. Measured against the 30-week line. 2
RS Rating ?Relative strength from 1 to 99: an RS of 95 means the stock has outperformed 95% of all stocks. 89
EPS Rating ?Earnings growth rating from 1 to 99 versus all stocks — high values mean above-average earnings growth. Top 10% 93
Fundamental Rating ?Our own Fundamental Rating: 0 to 100 points with an A+ to F grade. 50 points is the average across the universe, 100 the best possible score. It scores growth, earnings surprises, analyst estimates, margins, cash flow, and balance-sheet safety — every stock percentile-ranked against all others. Grades: A+ from 95, A from 75, B from 55, C from 45, D from 25, E from 5, F below. B (55 out of 100)

Highlighted are things our editorial team noticed: green = stands out as strong, red = deserves a closer look. No single metric is a verdict on its own — always read it in context.

Comparison

Industry comparison

The stock alongside the largest companies in the same group. The median row is the middle value of the companies shown above — not of the whole industry.

Industry: Medical Care Facilities

Industry comparison
Company Market cap ($B) P/E EV/EBITDA Gross Margin % EBIT Margin % Sales Growth (Year) % Perf. 1Y %
AMN Healthcare Services Inc AMN 1.3 5.0 27.8 -8.5 81.8
HCA Healthcare, Inc. HCA 95.2 15.2 9.0 42.6 15.0 7.1 8.2
Tenet Healthcare Corporation THC 22.6 14.0 5.8 41.7 17.9 3.1 42.8
Encompass Health Corp EHC 12.2 21.3 9.8 43.9 19.0 10.5 -0.2
DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc DVA 11.7 18.1 8.9 32.4 13.9 6.5 43.0
Universal Health Services Inc UHS 10.9 7.9 5.5 44.6 11.2 9.7 -3.1
The Ensign Group Inc ENSG 10.2 29.2 19.3 16.6 9.0 18.7 5.6
Chemed Corp CHE 6.7 29.8 15.7 33.1 12.9 4.1 11.2
PACS Group, Inc. PACS 6.5 20.3 17.3 8.5 29.3 274.9
Median of companies shown 10.9 18.1 9.0 33.1 13.4 7.1 11.2

Based on the most recently reported figures. Only stocks from the same trading venue are lined up, so the market caps are counted in one currency. Compare in a chart →

Fiscal years

Annual Figures

Fiscal years from the audited annual reports, oldest first. EBIT is the operating profit before interest and taxes; total assets are everything the company owns.

Revenue, operating income and net income per fiscal year $M

Revenue Operating income Net income

2016 · Revenue: 1,902 $M 2016 · Operating income: 192 $M 2016 · Net income: 106 $M 2017 · Revenue: 1,988 $M 2017 · Operating income: 212 $M 2017 · Net income: 133 $M 2018 · Revenue: 2,136 $M 2018 · Operating income: 203 $M 2018 · Net income: 142 $M 2019 · Revenue: 2,222 $M 2019 · Operating income: 177 $M 2019 · Net income: 114 $M 2020 · Revenue: 2,394 $M 2020 · Operating income: 149 $M 2020 · Net income: 71 $M 2021 · Revenue: 3,984 $M 2021 · Operating income: 478 $M 2021 · Net income: 327 $M 2022 · Revenue: 5,243 $M 2022 · Operating income: 647 $M 2022 · Net income: 444 $M 2023 · Revenue: 3,789 $M 2023 · Operating income: 338 $M 2023 · Net income: 211 $M 2024 · Revenue: 2,984 $M 2024 · Operating income: -103 $M 2024 · Net income: -147 $M 2025 · Revenue: 2,730 $M 2025 · Operating income: 33 $M 2025 · Net income: -96 $M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Annual Figures
Fiscal Year Revenue ($M) EBIT ($M) Net Income ($M) EPS ($) Operating Cash Flow ($M) Equity ($M) Total Assets ($M)
2016 1,902 192 106 2.15 132 449 1,187
2017 1,988 212 133 2.68 115 563 1,254
2018 2,136 203 142 2.91 227 639 1,493
2019 2,222 177 114 2.40 225 737 1,932
2020 2,394 149 71 1.48 257 820 2,354
2021 3,984 478 327 6.81 305 1,162 3,132
2022 5,243 647 444 9.90 654 1,044 2,888
2023 3,789 338 211 5.36 372 831 2,924
2024 2,984 -103 -147 -3.85 320 707 2,416
2025 2,730 33 -96 -2.48 269 642 2,094

Quarters

Quarterly Figures

Each bar is one quarter, the last one is the most recent. Use the switch to step through the individual figures.

Revenue & Profit

Cash Flow

Balance Sheet

Margins

Per Share

Click the chart or tab into it, then use ← and → to step through the periods.

None of the selected stocks reports this metric. Pick another metric or switch between annual and quarterly.

These companies report in different currencies — switch on “Indexed” or pick a margin for a fair comparison.

The figures could not be loaded right now.

Sales Per Quarter ($M)
2024: Q4 · 734.7 $M Q4 2025: Q1 · 689.5 $M Q1 2025: Q2 · 658.2 $M Q2 2025: Q3 · 634.5 $M Q3 2025: Q4 · 748.2 $M Q4 2026: Q1 · 1,378.4 $M Q1 2026: Q2 · 673.2 $M Q2

Source: fundamental data

Quarterly Figures
Quarter EPS (Earnings Per Share) EPS YoY (%) Sales ($M) Sales YoY (%) Net Margin (%) OCF ($M) FCF ($M)
2024: Q4 -4.90 -1,597.80 735 -10.20 -25.50 73 57
2025: Q1 -0.03 -106.30 690 -16.00 -0.20 93 83
2025: Q2 -3.02 -812.30 658 -11.10 -17.70 79 69
2025: Q3 0.76 314.70 635 -7.70 4.60 23 15
2025: Q4 -0.20 748 1.80 -1.00 76 68
2026: Q1 1.59 1,378 99.90 4.50 563 555
2026: Q2 0.53 117.50 673 2.30 3.10 -190 -198

What Do These Terms Mean?

EPS (Earnings Per Share):
Quarterly profit divided by the total share count — how much of the profit works out to a single share.
YoY (Year over Year):
Change versus the same quarter a year ago — this is how you compare without seasonal distortion (e.g. the holiday shopping season).
Sales:
All revenue for the quarter, before any costs are deducted — the top line of the income statement.
Net Margin:
What percentage of sales is left over as profit in the end. Negative means the company is posting a loss.
OCF (Operating Cash Flow):
The cash that actually flows into the till from the core business during the quarter — harder to dress up than book profit.
FCF (Free Cash Flow):
Operating cash flow minus capital expenditures — the money that's genuinely free to use, say for paying down debt, buybacks, or dividends.

Compare with other stocks →

Screening

Appears in These Scanners

This stock currently matches 26 of our scanner strategies — each hit links to the scanner.

Growth

Quality & Balance Sheet

Breakout & Setup

Momentum & Trend

Research

Value & GARP

Only genuine hits from verified scanners count; pure ranking metrics (P/E, P/S, and similar, which just sort the whole universe) don't count as a hit. View all scanners

Outlook

Analysts & Price Target

Combined picture of the price targets and recommendations of every analyst covering the stock. Price targets are expectations for the next 12 months, not promises — and they often follow the price rather than predict it.

Consensus Hold 1 = Strong buy … 5 = Strong sell
Analyst Ratings 9
Price Target (average) 36.14$
Distance to price 4.5% The price target sits 4.5% above the current price.

Distribution of Recommendations

Strong Buy 1
Buy 2
Hold 5
Sell 1
Strong Sell 0

Estimates by Fiscal Year

Estimates by Fiscal Year
Fiscal Year EPS Estimate ($) EPS Range ($) Revenue Estimate ($M) Expected Growth Analysts
12/31/2026 3.29 3.17 – 3.44 3,352 141.7% 9
12/31/2027 0.94 0.74 – 1.36 2,664 -71.5% 9

Average of the analyst estimates for the coming fiscal years. The range shows how far the most optimistic and the most cautious estimate sit apart — the wider it is, the less certain the expectation.

Valuation

What is priced in?

Instead of guessing what the stock is worth, we turn the question around: what free cash flow growth has to happen for today’s market value to add up? The assumptions behind it can be moved.

With these assumptions (discount rate 10.0%, terminal growth 2.5%), no growth rate between -20.0% and 60.0% per year explains today’s market value — the reverse calculation yields no meaningful figure here.

What is priced in?
Free cash flow (last twelve months) $439.1M
Market cap $1.33B
Free cash flow in year ten
Terminal value as a share of market value

For comparison: over the past five years free cash flow grew by 1.4% per year.

It shows which assumption is built into today’s price, not whether that assumption will hold. Every assumption can be changed with the sliders; the figures move with them.

A simplified model calculation — not a forecast and not a recommendation.

AI classification

AI Rating

Threatened

AMN Healthcare vermittelt medizinisches Personal (u. a. Reisekrankenpfleger) an Kliniken. Die Risikofaktoren des Geschäftsberichts (10-K 2025) nennen die zunehmende Verbreitung von KI-Technologien konkret als Gefahr fuer das eigene Geschaeftsmodell: Kunden koennten ihre interne Personalplanung und Rekrutierung mit KI so weit verbessern, dass ihr Bedarf an AMNs Vermittlungsleistungen sinkt; KI koenne die Nachfrage nach den Diensten reduzieren oder Wettbewerbsangebote ermoeglichen. KI ist keine belegbare eigene Umsatzquelle (das Segment Technology & Workforce Solutions verkauft Sprach-/Dolmetsch-Dienste und Vendor-Management-Software, keine als KI-Umsatz ausgewiesenen Produkte; die SaaS-Loesung Smart Square wurde 2025 sogar verkauft). Intern setzt AMN KI zwar zur Effizienzsteigerung ein (Recruiting, Credentialing), doch nach der Vorrangregel (bedroht > nutzt) ueberwiegt die konkret formulierte Bedrohung des eigenen Vermittlungsmodells.

View the full file — quotes, sources, reviewed filings
„With the advent of technology and more sophisticated staffing management and recruitment processes, including internal “travel,” other healthcare staffing models, and the increasing adoption of AI technologies, clients may be able to successfully increase the efficiency and effectiveness of their internal staffing management and recruiting efforts, through more effective planning and analytic tools, internet- or social media-based recruiting or otherwise."

Mit dem Aufkommen von Technologie und ausgefeilteren Personalmanagement- und Rekrutierungsprozessen — darunter internen „Travel“-Programmen, anderen Personalmodellen und der zunehmenden Verbreitung von KI-Technologien — koennten Kunden in der Lage sein, die Effizienz und Wirksamkeit ihrer internen Personalsteuerung und Rekrutierung erfolgreich zu steigern, durch wirksamere Planungs- und Analysewerkzeuge, internet- oder social-media-basierte Rekrutierung oder auf andere Weise.

10-K · 2026-02-20 · View SEC filing

„As technology continues to evolve, more tasks currently performed by people may continue to be replaced by automation, robotics, machine learning, AI and other technological advances that may be outside of our control. These technological changes may reduce demand for our services, enable the development of competitive products or services or enable our customers to reduce or bypass the use of our services."

Mit der Weiterentwicklung der Technologie koennten immer mehr Aufgaben, die derzeit von Menschen erledigt werden, durch Automatisierung, Robotik, maschinelles Lernen, KI und andere technologische Fortschritte ersetzt werden, die sich unserer Kontrolle entziehen. Diese technologischen Veraenderungen koennten die Nachfrage nach unseren Diensten verringern, die Entwicklung konkurrierender Produkte oder Dienste ermoeglichen oder unseren Kunden erlauben, die Nutzung unserer Dienste zu reduzieren oder zu umgehen.

10-K · 2026-02-20 · View SEC filing

„We are increasing investments in automation and AI-enabled technology to improve efficiency and speed across our operations, with positive early results in functions including recruiting, credentialing and candidate engagement."

Wir erhoehen die Investitionen in Automatisierung und KI-gestuetzte Technologie, um Effizienz und Geschwindigkeit in unseren Ablaeufen zu verbessern, mit positiven ersten Ergebnissen in Funktionen wie Recruiting, Credentialing und Kandidatenansprache.

10-K · 2026-02-20 · View SEC filing

Filings Reviewed: 10-K 2026-02-20 · 10-Q 2026-05-08 · 10-Q 2025-11-07 · 10-Q 2025-08-08 · 10-Q 2025-05-09 · 10-K 2025-02-21

Rated on July 10, 2026 · How the Rating Is Built

Growth

Growth Score

Ten checks against the annual reports — each one passed counts a point.

2 of 10 Weak growth
  • Revenue grows by more than 15% a year over three years -19.5%
  • More than 10% revenue growth is expected for the coming year -19.9%
  • Share count grows by less than 3% a year -5.0%
  • Revenue growth plus cash-flow margin add up to at least 40 ("Rule of 40") 0.1%
  • Gross margin at 40% or higher and without meaningful erosion 28.4%
  • Goodwill from acquisitions does not grow faster than revenue 36.1%
  • Net debt below twice EBITDA 7.6 x EBITDA
  • Operating cash flow covers the profits of the last three years 994 m
  • Return on capital at 15% or higher, or up versus two years ago 2.2%
  • Insiders hold at least 10% or are net buyers 1.0%

A criterion without figures counts neither as passed nor as failed; a score is only produced from 7 judgeable criteria upwards. Source: fundamental data. All ten criteria in detail

Quality check

AAQS

1/10

The AAQS (AlleAktien Quality Score) checks 10 quality criteria on growth, profitability, and balance-sheet strength — per the methodology developed and published by AlleAktien, calculated by us from our own fundamental data. A stock counts as a quality stock from 9 out of 10 points. Where a company has a shorter listing history, we calculate over the fiscal years available (at least five).

  • Sales growth 10Y > 5% 4.1%
  • Exp. sales growth 3Y > 5% -1.2%
  • EBIT growth 10Y > 5% -17.7%
  • Exp. EBIT growth 3Y > 5% -1.2%
  • Net debt < 4x EBIT 23.2x
  • EBIT positive, 10Y straight 9
  • Max. EBIT decline < 50% 100.0%
  • Return on equity > 15%
  • ROCE > 15% 2.2%
  • Expected return > 10% 16.1%

View stocks with the full AAQS score · Read the methodology at AlleAktien

Source: fundamental data

Insiders

Insider Transactions

Reportable transactions by officers and major shareholders from SEC Form 4 filings. "Other" includes things like stock grants and option exercises without a buy/sell character.

Insider Transactions
Date Person Role Type Shares Price Value
Sep 15, 2026 Laughlin Whitney M Chief Legal Officer Other 122 34.19 4,171
Sep 15, 2026 Laughlin Whitney M Chief Legal Officer Other 498 0.00

View all insider transactions →

The company

About the Company

AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. bietet technologiegestützte Personallösungen und Vermittlungsdienstleistungen im Gesundheitswesen für Akut- und Subakutkrankenhäuser und andere Gesundheitseinrichtungen in den USA an.

Employees
2,664
Headquarters
Dallas, TX
Address
2999 Olympus Boulevard, 75019 Dallas, United States
Phone
866 871 8519
IPO Date
11/13/2001
ISIN
US0017441017
Stock Split
2:1 on 05/28/2003

Management

Management
Name Title Birth Year
Caroline Sullivan Grace President, CEO & Director 1969
Brian M. Scott CFO & COO 1970
Mark Christopher Hagan Chief Information & Digital Officer 1968
Whitney M. Laughlin Corporate Secretary & Chief Legal Officer 1970
Christopher S. Schwartz Chief Accounting Office & Controller
Nishan Sivathasan Division President of Technology and Workforce Solutions
Randle G. Reece Senior Director of Investor Relations & Strategy
Julie Macdonald Chief Communications Officer
Kerry Perez Chief Marketing Officer
Holly Novak Chief People Officer

Executives per the latest required filings; titles kept in their original language. Source: fundamental data.

Filings

Company Filings (8-K)

An 8-K is the filing a US company must use to disclose material events immediately — takeovers, changes at the top, major contracts or payment troubles, for instance. The links open the original document at the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

  • 08/06/2026 AMN HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC (AMN): Financial Statements and Exhibits SEC ↗

Data as of: September 17, 2026 · Source: fundamental data & SEC filings (annual and quarterly reports, 10-K/10-Q)

Note: pure fact-based analysis, not investment advice and not a solicitation to buy or sell. All figures without guarantee.

Was this page helpful to you?