TickerGuard
Buy Day today: Good (62) Broad market participation · no major macro event
PROP

Prairie Operating Co.

Energy · Oil & Gas E&P

0.4012$ +1.5% vs. previous close Closing price · As of: Sep 17, 2026
🔔 Watch stock
Add to watchlist

Assessment

Our Rating

A journalistic assessment by our editorial team at the time of the deep dive — it rates the company, not the entry point. Not investment advice and not a solicitation to buy or sell.

Open questions

The business works in principle, but one material question is open. As long as it stays open, our findings do not carry a quality verdict.

Why this colour

After the materiality gate several serious structural and price findings remain standing, and they coincide: high, price-dependent debt (net debt about 3.1 times operating profit, a credit limit redetermined every six months), a debt-financed roll-up that is still writing red ink (a net loss of $60.9 million), heavy dilution (the share count multiplied) and weak realized prices — confirmed by six weakness and downtrend filters in the scanner. Against that stands documented substance (PV-10 $1.22 billion, no acute going-concern issue, partial hedging), which makes a total failure unlikely for now but delivers no margin of safety. Our findings see no basis for buying the downtrend against the company's own balance sheet; they argue for caution. The decision is yours. Not investment advice.

What the thesis turns on

Assessment: Opportunities & Risks

Prairie Operating is a debt-financed oil and gas producer in the DJ Basin that multiplied its output within a single year, through acquisitions, from 464 to 18,487 barrels a day. The oil really flows, and the reserves (PV-10 $1.22 billion) are substance. But the growth was paid for with a heavily drawn credit line ($366.0 million drawn, net debt roughly $484 million, about 3.1 times EBITDA), a preferred stock worth $148.3 million and fresh common shares — alongside a net loss of $60.9 million and a realized price that fell to $35.81 per barrel. No acute doubt about survival, but high, price-dependent leverage, heavy dilution and a share price in a confirmed downtrend. A leveraged bet on a firm oil price, not a bargain. Not investment advice.

Business model & reserves

Prairie produces real oil and gas in the established DJ Basin (18,487 Boe/day in 2025, roughly half of it oil) and reports 121 million barrels of proved reserves with a PV-10 of $1.22 billion — substance in the ground. Production costs per barrel are low. But the growth comes from acquisitions, not from its own drilling, and the PV-10 holds only at a fixed cut-off price.

Growth & earnings

The jump in output is real, yet it does not carry itself: despite output rising forty-fold, 2025 ended with a net loss of $60.9 million (net margin roughly minus 38 percent), while the realized price per barrel fell from $46.70 to $35.81. Plenty of volume, a weak price, red ink — Prairie produces a great deal and so far earns nothing for its shareholders.

Debt & credit limit

The acquisition roll-up (Bayswater alone $602.8 million) drove the drawn credit line to $366.0 million; net debt stands at roughly $484 million — about 3.1 times operating profit. The credit limit (borrowing base $475 million) is redetermined twice a year and depends on the oil price. No acute going-concern issue, but serious, price-dependent leverage.

Dilution & capital discipline

Next to the debt, shareholders paid with their stake: $148.3 million of Series F preferred stock (convertible into 21.5 million shares) plus 3.66 million new common shares to Bayswater. The weighted share count rose from 15.5 million to 45.2 million, with roughly 97.7 million outstanding (mid-2026). There is no dividend. Growth on credit and with fresh shares at the same time.

Valuation & chart picture

Optically cheap (price-to-sales around 0.25), but normally valued on an enterprise-value basis (EV/EBITDA about 3.6, roughly $30,400 per Boe/day). Technically, six weakness and downtrend filters carry the stock close to its low — the market confirms the skepticism toward the debt-financed model. Cheap here can also mean cheap for good reason.

Worth Noting

Materiality gate (finding typology): debt — net debt of roughly $484 million, about 3.1 times EBITDA ($158 million); credit facility $366.0 million drawn against a borrowing base of $475 million (only $113.5 million free as of 31.03.2026), redetermined every six months against the oil price. A serious structural finding with existential proximity under stress (a borrowing-base cut), but NOT an existential finding in the narrow sense, since the company expressly denies a going-concern doubt and the PV-10 ($1.22 billion) covers the debt. Outspending/capital discipline — Bayswater $602.8 million debt-financed, a net loss of $60.9 million, a margin of minus 38 percent = a structural/price finding. Dilution — shares from 15.5 million to 45.2 million (weighted) and roughly 97.7 million outstanding, Series F convertible into 21.5 million shares = a price finding. Commodity price — realized $35.81 per Boe (down from $46.70), gas $0.88 per Mcf, partly hedged (around $62 for oil in 2026) = a price/cyclicality finding. Downtrend — six weakness and downtrend filters, close to the 52-week low = market confirmation. Overall picture: no single existential finding, but the cluster of serious structural and price findings at debt-financed growth with a confirmed downtrend justifies caution on the evidence rather than the reflexive "watch" — there is no margin of safety at all.

Identity/history: Prairie Operating Co. (CIK 1162896, Commission File 001-41895, Delaware, ISIN US7396501097). Until May 2023 the company was named "Creek Road Miners, Inc." (a bitcoin miner); the reverse merger with Prairie LLC (completed in May 2023) turned it into the oil and gas producer. That explains the extreme price history against old all-time highs (a change of name and structure), which is not an operating argument for buying.

Price and valuation figures are dated to mid-2026; analyses are evergreen, daily prices are not a buy argument. The market value of roughly $79 million refers to roughly 97.7 million shares outstanding; the enterprise value of roughly $563 million follows from market value plus net debt.

Special-situation screening (EDGAR full index, CIK 1162896): the SC 13D filings date from 2023 (the reverse-merger/founding and insider environment, amendments through 08/2024); the DEF 14A 2026 is an ordinary annual meeting. No live hostile activist campaign, no announced strategic review, no poison pill (rights plan) and no takeover offer in the most recent mandatory filings. Insiders hold roughly 29 percent. A subordinated note ($5.0 million) is held by entities of director Jonathan H. Gray (a related party, with a 2.0x minimum return).

AI rating: neutral (a documented negative finding). The filings evaluated (10-K 2025/2024, 10-Q Q1 2026) contain no material AI angle: no AI revenue source, no documented operational use of AI, no AI business risk to the company's own model. The only hits are boilerplate in the cybersecurity risk section (deepfakes, AI-assisted attacks) — not grounds for a rating.

Stock Watch

This analysis is as of August 4, 2026. Stock Watch will tell you what's changed at PROP since then.

Later $1 a month per stock — signing up is free, and you'll be the first to know when it launches.

Price history

Chart

Interactive price chart (TradingView).

52-week range: 0.395 $ to 2.50 $ · Last price: 0.4012 $ (As of: September 17, 2026)

Key figures

Key figures at a glance

Every figure we hold for this stock, grouped by topic. The question mark next to a label explains what the number means.

Basics

Market Cap ?The value of the entire company on the market: share price times total shares outstanding. 0.04$B
Shares Outstanding ?Total number of shares issued. Price times share count gives market cap. 113m
Float ?Share of stock freely tradable on the market — not locked up in the hands of founders, insiders, or major shareholders. 68.4%
Beta ?Volatility versus the overall market: 1 = moves like the market, 2 = twice as much, under 1 = calmer than the market. -1.0

Performance

Perf. 1M ?Price performance over the last month. -24.10%
Perf. 3M ?Price performance over the last 3 months. -65.30%
Perf. 6M ?Price performance over the last 6 months. -58.60%
YTD Performance (%) ?Price performance since the start of the year (Year to Date). -61.20%
52-Week-High Distance ?How far the price sits below its highest point over the last 52 weeks. 0% means the stock is at its year high. -83.9%
Perf. 1Y ?Price performance over the last 12 months. -80.62%
Perf. 3Y ?Price performance over the last 3 years. -96.50%
Perf. 5Y ?Price performance over the last 5 years. -99.37%
Perf. 10Y ?Price performance over the last 10 years. -99.80%
Perf. Since Inception ?Price performance since the first available trading day (09/29/2008) — with a complete history, that is since the IPO. -65.11%

Technical Indicators

MA 38 Days ?Moving average of the last 38 trading days: the smoothed price path. A price above it signals short-term strength. 0.6128$
MA 50 Days ?Moving average of the last 50 trading days — the most widely watched medium-term trend line. 0.6517$
MA 200 Days ?Moving average of the last 200 trading days — the dividing line between a long-term uptrend and downtrend. 1.30$
RSI (14) ?Relative Strength Index over 14 days, scale 0 to 100: above 70 counts as overbought, below 30 as oversold. A hint on timing, not a verdict on the company. 32.3
Volatility 30 Days ?Price swings over the last 30 trading days, annualized. The higher the value, the more the price fluctuates. 139.4%
Volatility 250 Days ?Price swings over the last 250 trading days (roughly one market year), annualized. 104.0%

Calculated from the price history · as of 09/18/2026

Valuation

P/E ?Price-to-earnings ratio: how many years of profit does the stock cost? The lower, the cheaper the valuation. No earnings means no P/E.
Forward P/E ?P/E based on expected earnings for the next 12 months instead of past earnings — analysts' bet on the future. 1.1
PEG ?P/E divided by expected earnings growth: puts valuation in relation to growth. Around 1 is considered fair, well above that is pricey.
P/B ?Price-to-book ratio: market value relative to book equity.
P/S ?Price-to-sales ratio: market value divided by annual sales. Important for companies that aren't (yet) profitable. 0.1
EV/EBITDA ?Enterprise value including debt (EV) relative to operating profit before depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) — more comparable than P/E because debt counts too. Extreme values arise when EBITDA is near zero. 8.6
Price/FCF ?Market value divided by free cash flow: how many years of freely available cash does the stock cost? More honest than P/E because cash flow is harder to dress up. 0.1

Profitability

Gross Margin ?Gross margin: what's left of sales after only direct production costs are deducted — the product's pricing power. 71.8%
EBIT Margin ?EBIT margin: operating profit as a percentage of sales — the earning power of the core business before interest and taxes.
Net Margin ?Net margin: what's left of sales as profit after ALL costs, interest, and taxes. -13.0%
Return on Equity ?Return on equity: how much profit does the company generate per year on shareholders' equity? -49.0%
Return on Assets ?Return on assets: how much profit the company generates from its total assets (equity and debt combined). 8.2%

Balance Sheet & Safety

Equity Ratio ?Equity ratio: equity as a share of total assets. The higher, the more resilient the balance sheet.
Debt/Equity ?Leverage ratio: financial debt divided by equity. Under 1 is generally seen as solid; negative values mean negative equity.
Altman Z″ ?Edward Altman's bankruptcy early-warning score. We use the Z″ variant, built from four balance-sheet ratios — it is designed for service companies and non-manufacturers and uses book value instead of market value. On that scale: below 1.1 = danger zone, 2.6 and up = safe zone, in between a grey area. Because the classic Altman Z is calculated differently, the two numbers are not directly comparable. The formula does not fit banks, insurers, or real-estate stocks. warning zone 0.50
Piotroski ?Balance-sheet health check by Joseph Piotroski: 9 yes/no criteria on profit, cash flow, leverage, and efficiency. 7+ is very solid, under 3 is a red flag. 4 out of 9

Growth

Sales Growth Last Quarter ?Sales growth in the most recently reported quarter versus the same quarter a year ago (YoY). 0.00%
EPS Growth Last Quarter ?Growth in earnings per share in the most recently reported quarter versus the same quarter a year ago (YoY). 0.00%
Sales Growth (Year) ?Sales growth in the last fiscal year versus the year before. 2,943.81%
Forward Sales Growth ?Sales growth analysts expect over the next 12 months — an estimate, not a guarantee. 50.35%
Forward EPS Growth ?Earnings-per-share growth analysts expect over the next 12 months — an estimate, not a guarantee. 26.00%

Dividend

This stock currently pays no dividend.

Quality & Screener

Stage ?Weinstein phases 1 through 4: 1 = basing, 2 = uptrend (the only buy phase), 3 = topping, 4 = downtrend. Measured against the 30-week line. 4
RS Rating ?Relative strength from 1 to 99: an RS of 95 means the stock has outperformed 95% of all stocks. 2
EPS Rating ?Earnings growth rating from 1 to 99 versus all stocks — high values mean above-average earnings growth. 42
Fundamental Rating ?Our own Fundamental Rating: 0 to 100 points with an A+ to F grade. 50 points is the average across the universe, 100 the best possible score. It scores growth, earnings surprises, analyst estimates, margins, cash flow, and balance-sheet safety — every stock percentile-ranked against all others. Grades: A+ from 95, A from 75, B from 55, C from 45, D from 25, E from 5, F below. C (54 out of 100)

Highlighted are things our editorial team noticed: green = stands out as strong, red = deserves a closer look. No single metric is a verdict on its own — always read it in context.

Comparison

Industry comparison

The stock alongside the largest companies in the same group. The median row is the middle value of the companies shown above — not of the whole industry.

Industry: Oil & Gas E&P

Industry comparison
Company Market cap ($B) P/E EV/EBITDA Gross Margin % EBIT Margin % Sales Growth (Year) % Perf. 1Y %
Prairie Operating Co. PROP 0.0 8.6 71.8 2,943.8 -80.6
ConocoPhillips COP 162.3 22.7 6.5 47.6 22.1 7.5 46.4
EOG Resources Inc EOG 78.1 14.3 5.8 62.6 37.9 -3.5 25.6
Occidental Petroleum Corporation OXY 59.0 77.4 5.6 73.3 17.7 -20.3 26.8
Devon Energy Corporation DVN 55.7 13.4 7.4 50.3 6.9 7.8 42.1
Diamondback Energy Inc FANG 55.4 199.4 9.4 72.4 5.8 36.3 43.9
EQT Corporation EQT 31.6 9.8 5.6 80.8 57.4 73.7 2.1
Texas Pacific Land Corporation TPL 23.4 47.7 33.1 93.3 77.2 13.1 14.8
Expand Energy Corporation EXE 21.1 6.5 3.7 47.1 34.0 176.0 -9.4
Median of companies shown 55.4 18.5 6.5 71.8 28.0 13.1 25.6

Based on the most recently reported figures. Only stocks from the same trading venue are lined up, so the market caps are counted in one currency. Compare in a chart →

Fiscal years

Annual Figures

Fiscal years from the audited annual reports, oldest first. EBIT is the operating profit before interest and taxes; total assets are everything the company owns.

Revenue, operating income and net income per fiscal year $M

Revenue Operating income Net income

2016 · Revenue: 23 $M 2016 · Operating income: -1 $M 2016 · Net income: -2 $M 2017 · Revenue: 15 $M 2017 · Operating income: -5 $M 2017 · Net income: -6 $M 2018 · Revenue: 14 $M 2018 · Operating income: -1 $M 2018 · Net income: -3 $M 2019 · Revenue: 11 $M 2019 · Operating income: -2 $M 2019 · Net income: -2 $M 2020 · Revenue: 0 $M 2020 · Operating income: -2 $M 2020 · Net income: -2 $M 2021 · Revenue: 0 $M 2021 · Operating income: -18 $M 2021 · Net income: -17 $M 2022 · Revenue: 0 $M 2022 · Operating income: 0 $M 2022 · Net income: 0 $M 2023 · Revenue: 0 $M 2023 · Operating income: -17 $M 2023 · Net income: -79 $M 2024 · Revenue: 8 $M 2024 · Operating income: -27 $M 2024 · Net income: -41 $M 2025 · Revenue: 242 $M 2025 · Operating income: 69 $M 2025 · Net income: 32 $M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Annual Figures
Fiscal Year Revenue ($M) EBIT ($M) Net Income ($M) EPS ($) Operating Cash Flow ($M) Equity ($M) Total Assets ($M)
2016 23 -1 -2 -17.06 -2 2 6
2017 15 -5 -6 -47.80 -3 -3 3
2018 14 -1 -3 -21.70 -1 -5 2
2019 11 -2 -2 -17.62 -1 -6 3
2020 0 -2 -2 -15.81 -1 -7 3
2021 0 -18 -17 -103.77 -7 4 13
2022 0 0 0 -1.08 -2 -7 7
2023 0 -17 -79 -16.52 -12 40 46
2024 8 -27 -41 -2.65 -9 53 157
2025 242 69 32 0.00 154 130 945

Quarters

Quarterly Figures

Each bar is one quarter, the last one is the most recent. Use the switch to step through the individual figures.

Revenue & Profit

Cash Flow

Balance Sheet

Margins

Per Share

Click the chart or tab into it, then use ← and → to step through the periods.

None of the selected stocks reports this metric. Pick another metric or switch between annual and quarterly.

These companies report in different currencies — switch on “Indexed” or pick a margin for a fair comparison.

The figures could not be loaded right now.

Sales Per Quarter ($M)
2024: Q4 · 7.9 $M Q4 2025: Q1 · 13.6 $M Q1 2025: Q2 · 68.1 $M Q2 2025: Q3 · 77.7 $M Q3 2025: Q4 · 83.0 $M Q4 2026: Q1 · 83.4 $M Q1 2026: Q2 · 98.9 $M Q2

Source: fundamental data

Quarterly Figures
Quarter EPS (Earnings Per Share) EPS YoY (%) Sales ($M) Sales YoY (%) Net Margin (%) OCF ($M) FCF ($M)
2024: Q4 -0.12 8 773.40 -150.40 -4 -24
2025: Q1 -0.03 14 -19.30 17 2
2025: Q2 0.37 68 52.40 -7 -47
2025: Q3 0.01 78 1.70 58 450
2025: Q4 -0.02 83 945.60 -2.80 87 31
2026: Q1 -1.56 83 513.80 -183.00 42 8
2026: Q2 0.23 -37.80 99 45.20 110.20 52 52

What Do These Terms Mean?

EPS (Earnings Per Share):
Quarterly profit divided by the total share count — how much of the profit works out to a single share.
YoY (Year over Year):
Change versus the same quarter a year ago — this is how you compare without seasonal distortion (e.g. the holiday shopping season).
Sales:
All revenue for the quarter, before any costs are deducted — the top line of the income statement.
Net Margin:
What percentage of sales is left over as profit in the end. Negative means the company is posting a loss.
OCF (Operating Cash Flow):
The cash that actually flows into the till from the core business during the quarter — harder to dress up than book profit.
FCF (Free Cash Flow):
Operating cash flow minus capital expenditures — the money that's genuinely free to use, say for paying down debt, buybacks, or dividends.

Compare with other stocks →

Screening

Appears in These Scanners

This stock currently matches 11 of our scanner strategies — each hit links to the scanner.

Growth

Quality & Balance Sheet

Research

Risk & Weakness

Only genuine hits from verified scanners count; pure ranking metrics (P/E, P/S, and similar, which just sort the whole universe) don't count as a hit. Scanners marked in red are red-flag signals (risk/short scanners) — appearing there is not a seal of approval. View all scanners

Outlook

Analysts & Price Target

Combined picture of the price targets and recommendations of every analyst covering the stock. Price targets are expectations for the next 12 months, not promises — and they often follow the price rather than predict it.

Consensus
Analyst Ratings
Price Target (average) 2.00$
Distance to price 398.5% The price target sits 398.5% above the current price.

Estimates by Fiscal Year

Estimates by Fiscal Year
Fiscal Year EPS Estimate ($) EPS Range ($) Revenue Estimate ($M) Expected Growth Analysts
12/31/2026 0.51 0.51 – 0.51 226 142.3% 1
12/31/2027 0.39 0.39 – 0.39 433 -23.5% 1

Average of the analyst estimates for the coming fiscal years. The range shows how far the most optimistic and the most cautious estimate sit apart — the wider it is, the less certain the expectation.

Valuation

What is priced in?

Free cash flow over the past twelve months is negative, which rules out a serious reverse calculation. Any growth rate only makes a negative cash flow more negative; no present value comes out of it. What the price reflects here is therefore not a stream of cash flows, but the expectation that there will be one at all.

A simplified model calculation — not a forecast and not a recommendation.

AI classification

AI Rating

Neutral

Geprüft am 10.07.2026 gegen den Geschäftsbericht (10-K) 2025 (eingereicht 31.03.2026), den Geschäftsbericht 2024 sowie die vier jüngsten Quartalsberichte (10-Q): In den ausgewerteten SEC-Filings von Prairie Operating (Öl- und Gasförderer im DJ Basin) findet sich kein wesentlicher KI-Bezug. Es gibt keine KI-Produkte oder -Dienste als Umsatzquelle, keinen belegten operativen KI-Einsatz und keine Nennung von KI als konkretes Geschäftsrisiko fürs eigene Fördergeschäft. Die einzigen Treffer sind generische Floskeln im Cybersicherheits-Risikoabschnitt (Item 1A) des 10-K 2025 — etwa der Verweis auf KI-generierte Deepfakes und auf Fortschritte im Feld der Künstlichen Intelligenz als Bedrohung für IT-Sicherheitsmaßnahmen. Das ist Boilerplate ohne Bezug zum Geschäftsmodell und daher kein Einstufungsgrund. Klassischer Negativ-Befund eines E&P-Unternehmens.

View the full file — quotes, sources, reviewed filings
„Cybersecurity attacks are also becoming more sophisticated and include, but are not limited to, ransomware, credential stuffing, spear phishing, social engineering, use of deepfakes (i.e., highly realistic synthetic media generated by artificial intelligence), and other attempts to gain unauthorized access to data for purposes of extortion or other malfeasance."

Cyberangriffe werden zudem immer ausgefeilter und umfassen unter anderem Ransomware, Credential Stuffing, Spear-Phishing, Social Engineering, den Einsatz von Deepfakes (d. h. hochrealistische, von künstlicher Intelligenz erzeugte synthetische Medien) und andere Versuche, sich unbefugt Zugang zu Daten zu verschaffen — zum Zweck der Erpressung oder anderer böswilliger Handlungen.

10-K · 2026-03-31 · View SEC filing

„Advances in computer capabilities, discoveries in the field of artificial intelligence, cryptography, or other developments may result in a compromise or breach of the technology we use to safeguard confidential, personal, or otherwise protected information."

Fortschritte bei Rechenkapazitäten, Entdeckungen im Feld der künstlichen Intelligenz, der Kryptografie oder andere Entwicklungen können zu einer Kompromittierung oder Verletzung der Technologie führen, mit der wir vertrauliche, personenbezogene oder anderweitig geschützte Informationen absichern.

10-K · 2026-03-31 · View SEC filing

Filings Reviewed: 10-K 2026-03-31 · 10-Q 2026-05-14 · 10-Q 2025-11-14 · 10-Q 2025-08-12 · 10-Q 2025-05-15 · 10-K 2025-03-06

Rated on July 10, 2026 · How the Rating Is Built

Growth

Growth Score

Ten checks against the annual reports — each one passed counts a point.

6 of 10 Solid growth
  • Revenue grows by more than 15% a year over three years no data
  • More than 10% revenue growth is expected for the coming year 50.4%
  • Share count grows by less than 3% a year 4,621.5%
  • Revenue growth plus cash-flow margin add up to at least 40 ("Rule of 40") 2,925.9%
  • Gross margin at 40% or higher and without meaningful erosion no data
  • Goodwill from acquisitions does not grow faster than revenue 0.0%
  • Net debt below twice EBITDA 2.8 x EBITDA
  • Operating cash flow covers the profits of the last three years 221 m
  • Return on capital at 15% or higher, or up versus two years ago 8.4%
  • Insiders hold at least 10% or are net buyers 29.9%

A criterion without figures counts neither as passed nor as failed; a score is only produced from 7 judgeable criteria upwards. Source: fundamental data. All ten criteria in detail

Quality check

AAQS

5/10

The AAQS (AlleAktien Quality Score) checks 10 quality criteria on growth, profitability, and balance-sheet strength — per the methodology developed and published by AlleAktien, calculated by us from our own fundamental data. A stock counts as a quality stock from 9 out of 10 points. Where a company has a shorter listing history, we calculate over the fiscal years available (at least five).

  • Sales growth 10Y > 5% 30.1%
  • Exp. sales growth 3Y > 5% 33.9%
  • EBIT growth 10Y > 5%
  • Exp. EBIT growth 3Y > 5% 2,260.4%
  • Net debt < 4x EBIT 5.4x
  • EBIT positive, 10Y straight 1
  • Max. EBIT decline < 50% 0.0%
  • Return on equity > 15% 24.6%
  • ROCE > 15% 8.4%
  • Expected return > 10% -497.2%

View stocks with the full AAQS score · Read the methodology at AlleAktien

Source: fundamental data

Insiders

Insider Transactions

Reportable transactions by officers and major shareholders from SEC Form 4 filings. "Other" includes things like stock grants and option exercises without a buy/sell character.

Insider Transactions
Date Person Role Type Shares Price Value
Jul 21, 2026 Shelly Michael James Executive Vice President & CFO Other 840,000 0.00
Jul 21, 2026 Thoresen Erik Director Other 100,000 0.00
Jul 21, 2026 Frommer Richard N. Director Other 100,000 0.00
Jul 21, 2026 Gray Jonathan H. Director Other 100,000 0.00

View all insider transactions →

The company

About the Company

Prairie Operating Co., ein unabhängiges Energieunternehmen, befasst sich mit dem Erwerb und der Erschließung von Rohöl-, Erdgas- und Erdgasflüssigkeitsvorkommen in den USA.

Employees
59
Headquarters
Houston, TX
Address
55 Waugh Drive, 77007 Houston, United States
Phone
713 766 1200
ISIN
US7396501097
Stock Split
34:1000 on 10/16/2023
Stock Split
1:20 on 02/27/2020

Management

Management
Name Title Birth Year
Gregory S. Patton CEO & Director 1986
Michael J. Shelly Executive VP & CFO 1976
Bryan Freeman Executive Vice President of Operations 1971
Daniel T. Sweeney Executive VP, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary 1977
Louis J. Basenese Executive Vice President 1978

Executives per the latest required filings; titles kept in their original language. Source: fundamental data.

Filings

Company Filings (8-K)

An 8-K is the filing a US company must use to disclose material events immediately — takeovers, changes at the top, major contracts or payment troubles, for instance. The links open the original document at the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

  • 08/31/2026 Prairie Operating Co. (PROP): Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement; Material Modifications to Rights of Security Holders SEC ↗
  • 08/17/2026 Prairie Operating Co. (PROP): Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement; Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement of a Registrant; Material Modifications to Rights of Security Holders; Financial Statements and Exhibits SEC ↗
  • 08/17/2026 Prairie Operating Co. (PROP): Results of Operations and Financial Condition; Financial Statements and Exhibits SEC ↗
  • 08/10/2026 Prairie Operating Co. (PROP): Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement; Material Modifications to Rights of Security Holders; Financial Statements and Exhibits SEC ↗
  • 07/22/2026 Prairie Operating Co. (PROP): Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers: Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers; Regulation FD Disclosure; Financial Statements and Exhibits SEC ↗
  • 07/09/2026 Prairie Operating Co. (PROP): Notice of Delisting or Failure to Satisfy a Continued Listing Rule or Standard; Transfer of Listing SEC ↗

Data as of: September 17, 2026 · Source: fundamental data & SEC filings (annual and quarterly reports, 10-K/10-Q)

Note: pure fact-based analysis, not investment advice and not a solicitation to buy or sell. All figures without guarantee.

Was this page helpful to you?