TickerGuard
Buy Day today: Neutral (53) Mixed market breadth · no major macro event

EOG Resources Inc (EOG)

Energy Oil & Gas E&P
148.70 $
+2.2% vs. previous close
Closing price · As of: 31. Jul 2026
🔔 Watch stock

Stock Watch

Stock Watch will tell you what changes at EOG Resources Inc.

Later $1 a month per stock — signing up is free, and you'll be the first to know when it launches.

Appears in These Scanners

This stock currently matches 9 of our scanner strategies — each hit links to the scanner.

Only genuine hits from verified scanners count; pure ranking metrics (P/E, P/S, and similar, which just sort the whole universe) don't count as a hit. Scanners marked in red are red-flag signals (risk/short scanners) — appearing there is not a seal of approval. View all scanners

Trading Day

Previous Close
145.50$
Open
146.80$
Day High
148.70$
Day Low
144.90$
Volume
2,632,953shares

Key levels of the most recently completed trading day — not a live quote.

52-Week Range

52-Week Low 52-Week High
101.80 $ 149.90 $
12/16/2025 03/30/2026

Current price 148.70 $ — 98% of the range above the low.

Lowest and highest closing price over the last 52 weeks. The marker shows where the current price sits within that range: close to the high speaks for strength, close to the low for weakness.

Basics

Market Cap
79.8$B
Shares Outstanding
533Mio.
Float
99.7%
Beta
0.3

Performance

Perf. 1M
-2.00%
Perf. 3M
-11.10%
Perf. 6M
29.20%
YTD Performance (%)
30.70%
52-Week-High Distance
-12.0%
Perf. 1Y
28.19%
Perf. 3Y
24.77%
Perf. 5Y
158.43%
Perf. 10Y
148.15%
Perf. Since Inception
9,432.63%

Technical Indicators

MA 38 Days
137.10$
MA 50 Days
137.30$
MA 200 Days
124.00$
RSI (14)
64.6
Volatility 30 Days
31.7%
Volatility 250 Days
27.0%

Calculated from the price history · as of 08/03/2026

Valuation

P/E
14.6
Forward P/E
8.5
PEG
1.2
P/B
2.6
P/S
3.4
EV/EBITDA
7.0
Price/FCF
19.6

Profitability

Gross Margin
62.0%
EBIT Margin
37.9%
Net Margin
23.3%
Return on Equity
18.2%
Return on Assets
9.0%

Balance Sheet & Safety

Equity Ratio
57.9%
Debt/Equity
0.3
fortress balance sheet
Altman Z″
7.97
very solid
Piotroski
8 out of 9

Growth

Sales Growth Last Quarter
15.60%
EPS Growth Last Quarter
39.60%
Sales Growth (Year)
-3.47%
Forward Sales Growth
-9.62%
Forward EPS Growth
-14.30%

Dividend

Dividend Yield
2.74%
Dividend Per Share (TTM)
4.08$
Payout Ratio
48.6%
Years Without a Cut
1Years
Increase Streak
1Years

Quality & Screener

Stage
2
RS Rating
51
EPS Rating
75
very solid
Piotroski
8 out of 9
Fundamental Rating
B (57 out of 100)
fortress balance sheet
Altman Z″
7.97

AI Rating

Neutral

EOG Resources fördert und verkauft Rohöl, Flüssiggas und Erdgas; in den sechs geprüften Berichten (2× 10-K, 4× 10-Q) ist weder ein KI-Produkt noch ein KI-Umsatz noch ein operativer KI-Einsatz belegt. Der Begriff „artificial intelligence“ taucht ausschließlich in der Standard-Passage zu Cyberangriffen auf (je einmal im 10-K 2025 und im 10-K 2024), „machine learning“ in keinem der sechs Berichte. Die eigene Technologiebeschreibung nennt dreidimensionale Seismik, mikroseismische Daten und Lagerstättensimulationen — klassische Ingenieursverfahren, keine KI.

View the full file — quotes, sources, reviewed filings
„More recently, advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) may pose serious risks for many of the traditional tools used to identify individuals, including voice recognition (whether by machine or the human ear), facial recognition or screening questions to confirm identities."

In jüngerer Zeit können Fortschritte bei künstlicher Intelligenz (KI) erhebliche Risiken für viele der herkömmlichen Werkzeuge zur Identifizierung von Personen mit sich bringen — darunter Stimmerkennung (ob maschinell oder durch das menschliche Ohr), Gesichtserkennung oder Sicherheitsfragen zur Bestätigung von Identitäten.

10-K · 2026-02-24 · View SEC filing
„EOG is also focused on innovation and cost-effective utilization of advanced technology associated with three-dimensional seismic and microseismic data, the development of reservoir simulation models and the use of improved drilling equipment and completion technologies for horizontal drilling and formation evaluation."

EOG konzentriert sich zudem auf Innovation und den kosteneffizienten Einsatz fortschrittlicher Technologie im Zusammenhang mit dreidimensionalen seismischen und mikroseismischen Daten, der Entwicklung von Lagerstättensimulationsmodellen sowie dem Einsatz verbesserter Bohrausrüstung und Komplettierungstechnologien für Horizontalbohrungen und Formationsauswertung.

10-K · 2026-02-24 · View SEC filing

Filings Reviewed: 10-Q 2026-05-05 · 10-K 2026-02-24 · 10-Q 2025-11-06 · 10-Q 2025-08-07 · 10-Q 2025-05-01 · 10-K 2025-02-27

Rated on July 28, 2026 · How the Rating Is Built

What the Earnings Calls Reveal

Unremarkable Solid delivery record

EOG delivers with remarkable operational reliability: the capital budget was met in every year reviewed, production targets were mostly beaten, and the two large infrastructure projects Janus and Verde came online exactly on the announced schedule. At first glance several quantified targets appear to drift between calls. Reading the transcripts verbatim, however, the resolution is found in the same or the next call each time: the balance sheet target was always a leverage ratio and not an absolute figure, the 70 percent payout ratio has been the committed minimum for years rather than a cut, and the three-year scenario states its price assumption in the same sentence every time. What remains are questions of timing and emphasis, each of which management raised itself.

10 calls reviewed, 2023-Q4 through 2026-Q1 · As of August 2, 2026

Delaware productivity: mechanism early, figure late

The sentence that per-well productivity had declined in the prior year while the economics had not came only in the 2025-Q4 full-year call. The reason behind it, however, was already in the transcripts earlier. As early as 2024-Q4 the COO answered the direct question on Delaware productivity by saying the numbers vary with well mix because the company works through different target zones and the shallower targets had become economic through lower costs. In 2025-Q2 the company itself named nine additionally developed target zones, and in 2025-Q3 it responded to the reference to weaker third-party data at length with 15 percent lower well costs, 20 percent longer laterals and the newly unlocked zones with payback under one year. The mechanism was therefore disclosed throughout; only the resulting metric was spelled out late. The CEO conceded this himself in 2025-Q4: the company should have highlighted the changed development approach better. What remains is a presentation shortcoming, not concealment.

Three-year scenario: same plan, stated price assumption

In the 2025-Q4 full-year call management named cumulative free cash flow of 10 to 18 billion dollars for 2026 through 2028 at 55 to 70 dollars per barrel. In 2026-Q1 the CEO quoted 12 to 24 billion dollars for the same scenario. This is not a silent change of target: he names the underlying price range of 60 to 80 dollars in the same sentence, and the difference corresponds arithmetically to the price sensitivity of the very same plan. The activity framework is identical in both cases, namely low single-digit oil growth at an unchanged cost structure, and both times the same core sentence follows, that the scenario delivers roughly 20 percent more free cash flow than the past three years at the same price deck. The 2025-Q1 statement that the scenario was never meant as guidance is not a retroactive distancing either: it was expressly introduced as an illustration when first presented in 2023-Q4, and in 2025-Q1 the CEO added that it was still directionally accurate. The first scenario runs through the end of 2026 and has therefore not yet expired.

Balance sheet target: ratio, not absolute figure

In 2024-Q3 the CFO announced raising debt to 5 to 6 billion dollars within 12 to 18 months. What matters is how she derived that number: the target is total debt below one times earnings at an oil price of 45 dollars, and anyone computing that arrives at 5 to 6 billion. The ratio is the commitment, the amount its arithmetic output at the time. After the Encino acquisition earnings grew, so the permissible debt amount rose accordingly. Management reconciled this openly, in 2025-Q2, in 2025-Q3 with the sentence that total debt was right at the target of about one times, and again in 2025-Q4 and 2026-Q1. The cash balance was not quietly dropped either: on the direct analyst question in 2025-Q3 the CEO explained why share buybacks took priority over building cash at the valuation of the time. By the end of the first quarter of 2026 cash had risen again to over 3.8 billion dollars. The Utica finding cost question was resolved in the same way, in the 2024-Q3 call itself: the 6 to 8 dollars apply to 225,000 acres in the volatile oil window over two to three years, the roughly 5 dollars to the full 445,000 acre position at full development.

Payout: 70 percent is the committed floor

In 2026-Q1 the CFO spoke of at least 70 percent of free cash flow, one quarter after saying the company expected to return 90 to 100 percent in 2026. This is not a cut. The 70 percent has been the company's firm floor for years: as early as 2024-Q4 the actual 98 percent payout was expressly framed as far above the minimum commitment of 70 percent, and in 2025-Q3 the CEO called it verbatim a minimum commitment that had recently been exceeded at around 92 percent. The 90 to 100 percent, in turn, was twice explicitly tied to the environment at the time in 2025-Q4. After the oil price jump, expected free cash flow rose to 8.5 billion dollars, so even the floor would produce the largest payout in company history. Asked directly, the CEO did not rule out 90 to 100 percent and justified the restraint by saying the buyback program should not become procyclical. That is the same logic as in 2025-Q3, when at low share prices buybacks conversely took priority over cash.

Dorado and Gulf States: dates pushed back

Two dates from the 2025-Q4 full-year call lasted only one quarter. First the year-end target for the Dorado gas play of roughly 1 billion cubic feet per day, cut in 2026-Q1 to a little over 800 million because capital was shifted from gas into oil projects. Second the initial well results from Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates, now expected in the second half of 2026 instead of the second quarter; management named the Iran conflict and the repositioning of some staff as context. Both changes appeared unprompted in the prepared remarks, both are reasoned, and both deadlines only expire at the end of 2026. It would be wrong to read this as Dorado being demoted immediately after its promotion to fourth foundational asset: the status was unchanged, only near-term drilling and completion activity was scaled back. That activity follows the gas price is what management had announced consistently since 2024-Q1 and had already acted on once in 2024.

Counterbalance: the core delivery record is strong

The operational record is very good. The 6.2 billion dollar capital budget announced in 2023-Q4 for 2024 was met exactly, the 3 percent oil growth was achieved and total growth beaten at 8 instead of 7 percent. In 2024-Q2 and 2024-Q3 the full-year forecast was raised rather than cut. The Janus gas processing plant came online in the first half of 2025 as promised in 2023-Q4 and reached full utilization in March 2026; the Verde pipeline reached phase 2 in 2024 as announced. Drilling in Bahrain, announced in 2024-Q4 for the second half of 2025, began in the third quarter of 2025. The 150 million dollar synergy target from the Encino acquisition named in 2025-Q2 was reached ahead of the promised one-year deadline according to 2025-Q4, and the 750 million cubic feet per day year-end target for Dorado, also named in 2025-Q2, was met precisely. The dividend has never been cut in 28 years.

Management promises

  • 2023-Q4 kept

    The Janus gas processing plant in the Delaware Basin will start up in the first half of 2025.

    Reported as commissioned in 2025-Q1, exactly within the promised window. In 2026-Q1 the plant had run at 94 percent utilization since November 2025 and reached full utilization in March 2026.

  • 2023-Q4 kept

    Phase 2 of the Verde gas pipeline to Agua Dulce will be fully in service during 2024.

    According to 2024-Q4 Verde came into service in the fourth quarter of 2024, with 1 billion cubic feet per day of capacity. The date was confirmed unchanged across four calls.

  • 2023-Q4 open

    Management stands by the previously stated finding costs of roughly 5 dollars per barrel of oil equivalent in the Utica.

    The range of 6 to 8 dollars named in 2024-Q3 does not replace this figure. On follow-up in the same call management explained that the 6 to 8 dollars apply to the 225,000 acres in the volatile oil window and the next two to three years, while the roughly 5 dollars refer to the full 445,000 acres at full development, and that it still had line of sight to that figure. It is a full-development estimate without a due date and therefore not yet reconcilable.

  • 2024-Q3 kept

    The capital structure will be managed so that total debt stays below one times earnings at 45 dollars WTI; at the time that equated to 5 to 6 billion dollars of debt within 12 to 18 months.

    The ratio was met and reported in every call afterwards. In 2025-Q3 management said explicitly that total debt was right at the target of about one times; in 2025-Q4 and 2026-Q1 the target was confirmed again. The absolute amount rose to 7.9 billion dollars after the Encino acquisition because earnings grew with it. Cash stood at 3.4 billion dollars at the end of 2025, below the appropriate level named at the time; the deviation was explained on follow-up in 2025-Q3 by the priority given to share buybacks, and by the end of the first quarter of 2026 cash had risen again to over 3.8 billion dollars.

  • 2024-Q4 kept

    Drilling in Bahrain is to begin in the second half of 2025.

    In 2025-Q3 management reported that the first wells in Bahrain had been drilled in the third quarter of 2025. The deadline was therefore met.

  • 2025-Q2 kept

    The Encino acquisition should produce at least 150 million dollars in annual run rate synergies within one year of closing.

    In 2025-Q4 management reported that the synergy target had been reached ahead of the original one-year deadline. Utica well costs fell below 600 dollars per foot by the end of 2025 and drilling performance rose by more than 35 percent.

  • 2025-Q2 kept

    Dorado should reach roughly 750 million cubic feet per day of gross production by the end of 2025.

    In 2025-Q4 management confirmed it had met the 750 million cubic feet per day year-end figure. Well costs fell to roughly 750 dollars per foot at the same time.

  • 2025-Q4 open

    Dorado should reach roughly 1 billion cubic feet per day of gross production by the end of 2026.

    Just one quarter later, in 2026-Q1, management cut the year-end target to a little over 800 million cubic feet per day and scaled back drilling and completion activity. The reasons given were low gas prices and a shift of capital into oil projects, that is the returns-driven approach announced consistently since 2024. The reduction came unprompted in the prepared remarks; Dorado's foundational asset status was unchanged. The end of 2026 deadline has not yet been reached.

  • 2025-Q4 open

    Initial well results from the exploration projects in Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates should be available in the second quarter of 2026.

    In 2026-Q1 management pushed the date to the second half of 2026 and spoke of a slight slip in the timeline. The Iran conflict and the repositioning of some staff out of the region were named as context. The delay was disclosed on management's own initiative and the new window only expires at the end of 2026.

  • 2025-Q4 open

    In the environment at the time management expected to return 90 to 100 percent of free cash flow in 2026; the firm floor has been 70 percent for years.

    In 2026-Q1 the CFO named at least 70 percent after forecast free cash flow had risen to 8.5 billion dollars on the oil price jump; even the floor would therefore produce the largest payout in company history. The 90 to 100 percent had twice been explicitly tied to the environment at the time in 2025-Q4. Asked directly, the CEO did not rule it out and justified the restraint by saying the buyback program should not become procyclical. This will be settled with the 2026 full-year results.

Based on public earnings call transcripts. Reviewed: 10 transcripts 2023-Q4 through 2026-Q1.

Highlighted are things our editorial team noticed: green = stands out as strong, red = deserves a closer look. No single metric is a verdict on its own — always read it in context.

Analysts & Price Target

Current Price 148.70 $
Price Target (average) 157.89 $

The price target sits 6.2% above the current price.

Consensus
Sell
Analyst Ratings
31
Distribution of Recommendations
Strong Buy 12
Buy 1
Hold 18
Sell 0
Strong Sell 0

Combined picture of the price targets and recommendations of every analyst covering the stock. Price targets are expectations for the next 12 months, not promises — and they often follow the price rather than predict it.

Estimates by Fiscal Year

Estimates by Fiscal Year
Fiscal Year EPS Estimate ($) EPS Range ($) Revenue Estimate ($M) Expected Growth Analysts
12/31/2026 16.67 13.89 – 18.93 28,838 64.1% 25
12/31/2027 14.70 11.94 – 19.25 26,402 -11.8% 26

Average of the analyst estimates for the coming fiscal years. The range shows how far the most optimistic and the most cautious estimate sit apart — the wider it is, the less certain the expectation.

Next Reporting Date

4. Aug 2026 · after the close · Q2 2026
Expected Earnings per Share
5.10 $

Expected date of the next quarterly or annual figures. Dates do shift occasionally — only the invitation issued by the company is binding.

Revenue & Profit

Cash Flow

Balance Sheet

Margins

Per Share

Click the chart or tab into it, then use ← and → to step through the periods.

None of the selected stocks reports this metric. Pick another metric or switch between annual and quarterly.

These companies report in different currencies — switch on “Indexed” or pick a margin for a fair comparison.

The figures could not be loaded right now.

Sales Per Quarter ($M)
2024: Q4 · 5,650.0 $M Q4 2025: Q1 · 5,842.0 $M Q1 2025: Q2 · 5,355.0 $M Q2 2025: Q3 · 5,732.0 $M Q3 2025: Q4 · 5,638.0 $M Q4 2026: Q1 · 6,758.0 $M Q1

Source: fundamental data

Compare with other stocks →

Quarterly Figures

Quarterly Figures
Quarter EPS (Earnings Per Share) EPS YoY (%) Sales ($M) Sales YoY (%) Net Margin (%) OCF ($M) FCF ($M)
2024: Q4 2.23 -34.80 5,650 -6.30 22.10 2,763 1,398
2025: Q1 2.65 -14.70 5,842 0.10 25.00 2,289 806
2025: Q2 2.46 -16.60 5,355 -11.20 25.10 2,032 239
2025: Q3 2.70 -8.20 5,732 -2.30 25.70 3,111 1,448
2025: Q4 1.30 -41.70 5,638 -0.20 12.40 2,612 1,069
2026: Q1 3.70 39.90 6,758 15.70 29.30 2,966 1,322
What Do These Terms Mean?
EPS (Earnings Per Share):
Quarterly profit divided by the total share count — how much of the profit works out to a single share.
YoY (Year over Year):
Change versus the same quarter a year ago — this is how you compare without seasonal distortion (e.g. the holiday shopping season).
Sales:
All revenue for the quarter, before any costs are deducted — the top line of the income statement.
Net Margin:
What percentage of sales is left over as profit in the end. Negative means the company is posting a loss.
OCF (Operating Cash Flow):
The cash that actually flows into the till from the core business during the quarter — harder to dress up than book profit.
FCF (Free Cash Flow):
Operating cash flow minus capital expenditures — the money that's genuinely free to use, say for paying down debt, buybacks, or dividends.

Annual Figures

Annual Figures
Fiscal Year Revenue ($M) EBIT ($M) Net Income ($M) EPS ($) Operating Cash Flow ($M) Equity ($M) Total Assets ($M)
2016 7,463 -1,225 -1,097 -1.98 2,359 13,982 29,459
2017 11,206 926 2,583 4.46 4,265 16,283 29,833
2018 17,177 4,469 3,419 5.89 7,769 19,364 33,934
2019 16,942 3,699 2,735 4.71 8,163 21,641 37,125
2020 9,874 -544 -605 -1.05 5,008 20,302 35,805
2021 19,669 6,102 4,664 7.99 8,791 22,180 38,236
2022 29,492 9,966 7,759 13.22 3,166 24,779 41,371
2023 23,182 9,603 7,594 13.00 11,340 28,090 43,857
2024 23,378 8,082 6,403 11.25 12,143 29,351 47,186
2025 22,567 7,931 4,980 9.24 10,044 29,833 51,799

Fiscal years from the audited annual reports, oldest first. EBIT is the operating profit before interest and taxes; total assets are everything the company owns.

About the Company

EOG Resources, Inc. exploriert, entwickelt, fördert und vermarktet mit ihren Tochtergesellschaften Rohöl, Erdgasflüssigkeiten und Erdgas in Förderregionen in den USA, der Republik Trinidad und Tobago und international.

Employees3,400
HeadquartersHouston, TX
Address1111 Bagby Street, 77002 Houston, United States
Phone713 651 7000
Websiteeogresources.com
IPO Date4. Oct 1989
ISINUS26875P1012
Stock Split2:1 on 04/01/2014

Management

Management
Name Title Birth Year
Ezra Y. Yacob CEO & Chairman 1977
Ann D. Janssen Executive VP & CFO 1965
Jeffrey R. Leitzell Executive VP & COO 1980
Michael P. Donaldson Executive VP & Chief Legal Officer 1963
Laura B. Distefano VP & Chief Accounting Officer
Sandeep Bhakhri Senior VP and Chief Information & Technology Officer
Pearce Wheless Hammond Jr., C.F.A. Vice President of Investor Relations
Lori A. Geiger Vice President of Marketing
Chase Krieger Vice President of Corporate Development
Michele L. Hatz Senior VP & Chief Human Resources Officer

Executives per the latest required filings; titles kept in their original language. Source: fundamental data.

Chart

Interactive price chart (TradingView).

Data as of: July 31, 2026 · Source: fundamental data & SEC filings (annual and quarterly reports, 10-K/10-Q)

Note: pure fact-based analysis, not investment advice and not a solicitation to buy or sell. All figures without guarantee.

Was this page helpful to you?