Byline Bancorp Inc (BY)
🔔 Watch stock
symbol.quality_heading
Business model, numbers and balance sheet hold up to our review. Whether the current price supports an entry is a separate question — it hangs on the price, not on the company.
The business demonstrably carries its own weight and there is no substance risk on the record. Net income rose in 2023, 2024 and 2025 without interruption ($107.9 million, $120.8 million, $130.1 million) and reached $77.8 million in the first half of 2026 alone; credit quality is better than at many peers, with non-performing loans of 0.92 percent and net charge-offs of 0.24 percent (June 30, 2026) against reserves covering 1.48 percent of the loan book; and capital is thick, with a CET1 ratio of 12.92 percent and tangible common equity of 11.36 percent of assets. Nothing supports red: no going-concern doubt, no accounting or governance breach, no existential dependence on a single counterparty. The candidate for yellow would have been the two-year slide in return on tangible common equity — but that is not an operating weakness, it is the arithmetic of a deliberate capital build, and two quarters of 2026 show it rising again. What remains open is a question of capital allocation and price, not of quality: whether the hoarded capital ever becomes a well-priced sixth acquisition, and whether you want to pay about 1.5 times tangible book near a 52-week high. The fine print of the government guarantee and the $805.9 million of leveraged sponsor-finance loans remain risks you have to know about; so far they have produced no documented damage. The decision is yours.
symbol.quality_note
Byline Bank earns more than ever: net income of $130.1 million in 2025, a net interest margin of 4.22 percent that most regional banks can only dream of, and credit that simply refuses to crack. And yet the return on tangible equity fell for two years running — before turning back up in the first half of 2026. We read the annual report (10-K) for 2025, the quarterly report (10-Q) as of March 31, 2026 and the current report (8-K) of July 23, 2026 line by line: the popular story that this bank lives off selling government guaranteed loans does not survive the filings — the truth is both more boring and more interesting. Not investment advice — just a look behind the labels on a shop whose goods you can never see.
Read the analysis
Stock Watch
This analysis is as of July 16, 2026. Stock Watch will tell you what's changed at BY since then.
Later $1 a month per stock — signing up is free, and you'll be the first to know when it launches.
Appears in These Scanners
This stock currently matches 5 of our scanner strategies — each hit links to the scanner.
Only genuine hits from verified scanners count; pure ranking metrics (P/E, P/S, and similar, which just sort the whole universe) don't count as a hit. View all scanners
Trading Day
Key levels of the most recently completed trading day — not a live quote.
52-Week Range
Current price 39.30 $ — 100% of the range above the low.
Lowest and highest closing price over the last 52 weeks. The marker shows where the current price sits within that range: close to the high speaks for strength, close to the low for weakness.
Basics
Performance
Technical Indicators
Calculated from the price history · as of 08/03/2026
Valuation
Profitability
Balance Sheet & Safety
Growth
Dividend
Quality & Screener
AI Rating
ThreatenedDer 10-K 2025 führt einen eigenen, überschriebenen Risikofaktor „AI and our ability to implement and leverage AI to deliver new products and services to our customers present competitive risks“ — KI wird dort konkret als Wettbewerbsrisiko für das eigene Bankmodell benannt: Erfolg und Wettbewerbsfähigkeit hängen laut Filing davon ab, ob Byline die Technologie adaptiert, und ein Versäumnis könne einen „material adverse effect“ haben. Zweiter konkreter Bezug: Der Cyber-Risikofaktor führt die zunehmende Nutzung von KI-Technologien ausdrücklich als Verstärker der bereits gestiegenen Betrugs- und Sicherheitsvorfälle an, die die Bank nach eigener Aussage schon erlebt. Das ist keine Boilerplate-Floskel, sondern ein auf das eigene Geschäftsmodell bezogener Doppelbefund (Wettbewerb + Betrug). Eine KI-Umsatzquelle weisen die Filings nicht aus; operativer KI-Einsatz wird lediglich als Möglichkeit formuliert („We may also implement new technologies, such as those related to artificial intelligence“) und ist damit nicht als „nutzt“ belegbar. Nach der Vorrang-Regel (verkauft > bedroht > nutzt > neutral) daher: bedroht.
View the full file — quotes, sources, reviewed filings
„The financial services industry is experiencing and will continue to experience rapid technological change due to the emergence of AI, including generative AI and agentic AI. The effective use of AI enables financial institutions to better serve their customers and reduce expenses. Our success and competitiveness may depend in part on our ability to adopt such technology and deliver our products and services in a manner consistent with evolving customer preferences and industry standards."
Die Finanzdienstleistungsbranche erlebt und wird weiterhin einen rasanten technologischen Wandel durch das Aufkommen von KI erleben, einschließlich generativer und agentischer KI. Der wirksame Einsatz von KI versetzt Finanzinstitute in die Lage, ihre Kunden besser zu bedienen und Kosten zu senken. Unser Erfolg und unsere Wettbewerbsfähigkeit können teilweise davon abhängen, ob wir diese Technologie übernehmen und unsere Produkte und Dienstleistungen im Einklang mit sich wandelnden Kundenpräferenzen und Branchenstandards anbieten können.
„Failure to adopt AI tools that match our customer expectations and needs or failure to properly manage risks associated with AI could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operation."
Ein Versäumnis, KI-Werkzeuge einzuführen, die den Erwartungen und Bedürfnissen unserer Kunden entsprechen, oder ein Versäumnis, die mit KI verbundenen Risiken angemessen zu steuern, könnte wesentliche nachteilige Auswirkungen auf unser Geschäft, unsere Finanzlage oder unser Betriebsergebnis haben.
„Consistent with industry trends, we have also experienced an increase in attempted electronic fraudulent activity, security breaches, and cybersecurity-related incidents. The continued evolution and increased usage of AI technologies may further increase these risks."
Im Einklang mit den Branchentrends haben auch wir eine Zunahme versuchter elektronischer Betrugsaktivitäten, Sicherheitsverletzungen und Cybersicherheitsvorfälle erlebt. Die fortschreitende Entwicklung und zunehmende Nutzung von KI-Technologien kann diese Risiken weiter erhöhen.
Filings Reviewed: 10-K 2026-02-27 · 10-Q 2026-05-01
Rated on July 16, 2026 · How the Rating Is Built
What the Earnings Calls Reveal
Red flags Targets quietly droppedByline Bancorp delivers with unusual reliability on the metrics management itself puts front and centre: net interest income guidance was met or beaten in nine out of nine testable quarters from 2024-Q1 to 2026-Q2, and pre-tax pre-provision return stayed above two percent for 15 consecutive quarters. What stands out is something else: several previously stated targets have disappeared from the reporting without ever being reached or explicitly withdrawn. This is clearest around the ten billion dollar asset threshold, whose crossing has been dated and re-dated since 2024, and where management reversed its stated position within six months. Anyone judging the stock should look at the strong results and the loose commitment to targets separately.
10 calls reviewed, 2024-Q1 through 2026-Q2 · As of August 2, 2026
Ten billion threshold: date pushed back repeatedly, stance reversed
In 2024-Q1 the chairman said crossing the ten billion dollar mark could be seen organically "right in 2025", adding that the threshold did not consume the firm's thinking. By 2024-Q3 this had become a range of second half 2025 to first half 2026, expressly extendable in the same breath to full year 2026, and by 2024-Q4 the stated range reached into the third quarter of 2026. Only in 2025-Q3 did management name a specific date, the first quarter of 2026. That single firm date was missed: at the end of 2026-Q2 total assets still stand at 9.9 billion dollars, and no explanation was given. The reversal weighs heavier: in 2025-Q4 the CFO conceded securities had been sold at year end to stay below the mark, while the president assured that this constraint no longer applied and that no balance sheet management to stay below a level would be seen. This was reaffirmed in 2026-Q1. In 2026-Q2 the message was that if the ability to stay below ten billion existed in early December, the company would probably take it and manage the balance sheet accordingly.
Sub-90 percent loan-to-deposit target quietly abandoned
In 2024-Q2 the CFO explicitly named a target of driving the loan-to-deposit ratio below 90 percent over time; in 2024-Q3 a target level of plus/minus 90 percent was cited and the decline to 92 percent celebrated as good progress. The target carried no deadline and was therefore never tied to a date. After that it disappears from prepared remarks. The metric in fact moved the other way: in 2025 loans grew 8.9 percent while deposits grew only 2.5 percent. In 2026-Q2 the ratio is reported at 96 percent, 16 basis points above the prior quarter, with no reference to the earlier target and no explanation of why it no longer applies. Nobody followed up on it in the later calls.
Eight to nine percent capital target removed from the deck
From 2024-Q1 through 2024-Q2 the eight to nine percent tangible common equity target range was a fixed part of the commentary. From 2024-Q3 the ratio stood above it at 9.72 percent, still expressly described as being above the target range. It then rose further to 11.29 percent (2025-Q4) and 11.4 percent (2026-Q2), roughly 250 basis points above the company's own range, without any new target ever being stated. In 2025-Q4 an analyst asked directly whether anything should be read into the eight to nine percent target being absent from recent decks. The answer cited concrete steps - the dividend increase just announced, buybacks executed during the quarter and a new authorisation covering five percent of shares - plus the wish to keep room for acquisitions; no new range was given, however, and the old one was never formally withdrawn.
Expense guidance clearly missed once, then set above the actual run rate
Operating expense guidance was met in most quarters, exceeded narrowly once and clearly once, and shifted once without comment. In 2024-Q3 a range of 55 to 57 million dollars was given for 2024-Q4; the outcome was 57.4 million, which management flagged on the same call as coming in at the high end of the guide. The clearer miss was 2025-Q3: guidance issued in 2025-Q2 was 56 to 58 million dollars, actual expenses came in at 60.5 million. At the same time the full year 2025 range was lifted between 2024-Q3 (54 to 57 million) and 2024-Q4 (55 to 57 million) without any explanation. In 2026-Q1 and 2026-Q2 the full year guidance was each time called unchanged, while the lower bound moved from 58 to 59 million dollars and actual expenses ran at 57 and 56.5 million respectively. Asked about the implied second half step-up in 2026-Q2, management pointed to staff, healthcare and commission costs.
Checked and cleared: charge-off metric was not reframed after the fact
The obvious suspicion: in 2024-Q1 the president confirmed an expected charge-off rate of 35 to 45 basis points in reply to an analyst, reported net charge-offs then came in above it at 56 (2024-Q2) and 49 basis points (2024-Q3), and from that point the bank additionally showed an adjusted figure excluding acquired distressed loans (32 and 35 basis points). The suspicion does not hold: the president attached the caveat about those acquired, already marked loans to the very same 2024-Q1 answer in which he confirmed the range, including notice that such cases would be broken out separately in future. The extra breakout arrived in 2024-Q2 as an announced expansion of disclosure, the GAAP figure of 56 basis points was stated on the same call and the single relationship behind it explained. The 30 to 40 basis point range cited in 2024-Q4 was expressly labelled a normalised figure excluding those legacy loans, so the basis was disclosed rather than quietly switched. What remains is only this: on a GAAP basis full year 2024 ended at 47 basis points, above the range originally confirmed. Since 2025-Q4 the lower range has been delivered (2026-Q2: 24 basis points).
Counterweight: net interest income guidance met in nine of nine quarters
Where management puts a number on the table, it delivers. For 2024-Q2 net interest income guidance was 83 to 85 million dollars against 86.5 million delivered; for 2024-Q4 it was 85 to 87 million against 88.5 million; for 2025-Q3 95 to 97 million against 99.9 million; for 2025-Q4 97 to 99 million against 101 million. In all nine testable quarters from 2024-Q1 to 2026-Q2 the range was met or beaten. An analyst raised the pattern openly in 2025-Q4 and asked when the guidance would turn more confident; the answer pointed to hard-to-forecast loan payoffs and to a deliberately cautious deposit cost assumption that the bank keeps beating internally. Pre-tax pre-provision return also stayed above two percent throughout 2024-Q1 to 2026-Q2, which was the 15th consecutive quarter in the latest call.
Management promises
-
2024-Q3 kept
The First Security acquisition will close in the first half of 2025.
Beaten. In 2024-Q4 the closing was narrowed to early second quarter, completed on 1 April as reported in 2025-Q1, with the systems conversion finished within the same month.
-
2025-Q1 broken
The purchase marks, book value dilution and earnings accretion from the First Security deal will be disclosed on the next quarterly call.
The direct analyst question in 2025-Q1 was deferred twice to the next call. In 2025-Q2 only the day one loss reserve addition and a statement that all cost targets were on track were given. The promised figures for marks, book value dilution and earnings accretion never appeared, and nobody followed up.
-
2024-Q2 open
The loan-to-deposit ratio is to be brought below 90 percent over time.
Not to be counted as broken: the target was expressly framed as applying "over time", with no deadline, so it cannot be dated and missed. It has not been reached, however, and the direction is wrong: from 92.5 percent in 2024-Q1 and 92 percent in 2024-Q3 the ratio rose to 96 percent in 2026-Q2. After 2024-Q3 the target was never mentioned again, neither restated nor withdrawn.
-
2025-Q2 broken
Third quarter 2025 operating expenses will be between 56 and 58 million dollars.
2025-Q3 then reported 60.5 million dollars, roughly 2.5 million above the upper bound. This was attributed to higher incentive accruals and residual costs from calling subordinated debt. The variance was explained but never labelled a guidance miss.
-
2025-Q3 broken
The ten billion dollar asset threshold will be crossed in the first quarter of 2026.
In 2026-Q1 total assets stood at 9.9 billion dollars and in 2026-Q2 unchanged at 9.9 billion. Instead of explaining the missed date, the message shifted to crossing at any time and later to possibly managing below the mark until December 2026.
-
2025-Q4 open
The ten billion dollar threshold will be crossed during 2026, and the balance sheet will no longer be managed to stay below it.
At the half year point of 2026 the threshold has not been crossed. The second part of the pledge is already in doubt because 2026-Q2 explicitly held out the option of staying below ten billion into early December. The outcome can be tested at the 2026 year end results at the earliest.
Based on public earnings call transcripts. Reviewed: 10 transcripts 2024-Q1 through 2026-Q2.
Analysts & Price Target
The price target sits 9.9% above the current price.
- Consensus
- Sell
- Analyst Ratings
- 6
Combined picture of the price targets and recommendations of every analyst covering the stock. Price targets are expectations for the next 12 months, not promises — and they often follow the price rather than predict it.
Estimates by Fiscal Year
| Fiscal Year | EPS Estimate ($) | EPS Range ($) | Revenue Estimate ($M) | Expected Growth | Analysts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12/31/2026 | 3.39 | 3.37 – 3.41 | 465 | 12.9% | 5 |
| 12/31/2027 | 3.41 | 3.34 – 3.50 | 480 | 0.8% | 6 |
Average of the analyst estimates for the coming fiscal years. The range shows how far the most optimistic and the most cautious estimate sit apart — the wider it is, the less certain the expectation.
Next Reporting Date
- Expected Earnings per Share
- 0.82 $
Expected date of the next quarterly or annual figures. Dates do shift occasionally — only the invitation issued by the company is binding.
Revenue & Profit
Cash Flow
Balance Sheet
Margins
Per Share
Click the chart or tab into it, then use ← and → to step through the periods.
None of the selected stocks reports this metric. Pick another metric or switch between annual and quarterly.
· Total · per year
These companies report in different currencies — switch on “Indexed” or pick a margin for a fair comparison.
The figures could not be loaded right now.
Source: fundamental data
Quarterly Figures
| Quarter | EPS (Earnings Per Share) | EPS YoY (%) | Sales ($M) | Sales YoY (%) | Net Margin (%) | OCF ($M) | FCF ($M) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024: Q4 | 0.69 | 0.90 | 154 | 3.40 | 19.60 | 53 | 51 |
| 2025: Q1 | 0.64 | -8.40 | 149 | -2.80 | 19.00 | 27 | 25 |
| 2025: Q2 | 0.68 | 0.10 | 158 | 2.90 | 19.00 | 16 | 15 |
| 2025: Q3 | 0.82 | 18.90 | 163 | 1.60 | 22.90 | 38 | 38 |
| 2025: Q4 | 0.76 | 10.70 | 160 | 3.60 | 21.60 | 59 | 58 |
| 2026: Q1 | 0.83 | 29.70 | 153 | 3.00 | 24.50 | 55 | 54 |
- EPS (Earnings Per Share):
- Quarterly profit divided by the total share count — how much of the profit works out to a single share.
- YoY (Year over Year):
- Change versus the same quarter a year ago — this is how you compare without seasonal distortion (e.g. the holiday shopping season).
- Sales:
- All revenue for the quarter, before any costs are deducted — the top line of the income statement.
- Net Margin:
- What percentage of sales is left over as profit in the end. Negative means the company is posting a loss.
- OCF (Operating Cash Flow):
- The cash that actually flows into the till from the core business during the quarter — harder to dress up than book profit.
- FCF (Free Cash Flow):
- Operating cash flow minus capital expenditures — the money that's genuinely free to use, say for paying down debt, buybacks, or dividends.
Annual Figures
| Fiscal Year | Revenue ($M) | EBIT ($M) | Net Income ($M) | EPS ($) | Operating Cash Flow ($M) | Equity ($M) | Total Assets ($M) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 121 | 5 | 67 | 2.66 | 4 | 383 | 3,296 |
| 2017 | 182 | 41 | 22 | 0.79 | 27 | 459 | 3,366 |
| 2018 | 250 | 55 | 41 | 1.20 | 80 | 651 | 4,943 |
| 2019 | 312 | 77 | 57 | 1.50 | 29 | 750 | 5,522 |
| 2020 | 294 | 52 | 37 | 0.98 | 109 | 805 | 6,391 |
| 2021 | 316 | 124 | 93 | 2.42 | 74 | 836 | 6,696 |
| 2022 | 356 | 115 | 88 | 2.35 | 220 | 766 | 7,363 |
| 2023 | 479 | 146 | 108 | 2.67 | 166 | 990 | 8,882 |
| 2024 | 621 | 161 | 121 | 2.75 | 175 | 1,092 | 9,497 |
| 2025 | 629 | 183 | 130 | 2.86 | 140 | 1,268 | 9,653 |
Fiscal years from the audited annual reports, oldest first. EBIT is the operating profit before interest and taxes; total assets are everything the company owns.
Assessment: Opportunities & Risks
A Chicago commercial bank with a genuine specialty: one of the most active SBA/USDA lenders in the U.S. ($533.0 million on balance sheet, $1.6 billion serviced for others), which lifts the loan yield to 7.07 percent and the net interest margin to 4.22 percent — far above the roughly 3 percent regional-bank norm. 86.3 percent of 2025 revenue is recurring net interest income, not one-off gains (annual report 10-K 2025).
Record net income of $130.1 million in 2025 (+7.7 percent), return on assets of 1.36 percent, efficiency ratio of 51.83 percent — and the first half of 2026 was better still: $37.6 million and $40.2 million of net income, with the efficiency ratio below 50 percent for the first time and then down to 46.93 percent (adjusted 46.51, the best since the company went public). The much-feared SBA premium dependency is not visible in the fee line: those gains fell 7.4 percent to $22.7 million in 2025 while profit rose.
Return on average tangible common equity fell for two straight years — 16.46 percent (2023), 14.85 percent (2024), 13.47 percent (2025) — and return on equity from 12.50 to 10.86 percent, because the CET1 ratio was pushed from 10.35 to 12.33 percent. The capital is being hoarded for acquisitions that have not yet happened; shareholders carry the cost now. Two quarters of 2026 (ROTCE 13.77 and 14.47 percent) document the turn, but the cushion kept growing, to a CET1 ratio of 12.92 percent.
Credit refuses to crack where it was supposed to: non-performing loans of 0.95 percent, net charge-offs falling to 0.39 percent, reserves at 1.45 percent of loans, CRE office at just 9.2 percent of the CRE book and shrinking (December 31, 2025); in the second quarter of 2026 charge-offs fell further, to 0.24 percent. Capital is strong (CET1 12.92 percent, tangible common equity 11.36 percent of assets on June 30, 2026), tangible book value per share grew from $17.98 (2023) to $24.48 (June 30, 2026).
The best business has a silent partner: the SBA can reclaim losses from "significant technical deficiencies", and the bank keeps no reserves for such claims; Preferred Lender status, program rules and funding caps sit with the federal government. On top: goodwill of $181.9 million (14.3 percent of equity) from five takeovers, free deposits shrinking from 26.56 to 23.21 percent (June 30, 2026), loans at 98.37 percent of deposits in 2025, uninsured deposits of $2.7 billion, one metropolitan market — and $805.9 million of leveraged sponsor-finance loans inside a community bank.
About $1.7 billion of market value — roughly 13 times 2025 earnings, about 1.5 times tangible book value and 11.4 times the 2026 estimate — after a 45 percent twelve-month run that leaves the stock within 0.3 percent of its 52-week high. Six analysts average a $38.60 target, about three percent above the mid-July price: a shrug, not a catalyst. Against that: 4 insider purchases versus 2 sales, and a quarterly dividend raised 16.7 percent to $0.14 per share (data as of July 16, 2026; dividend from the 8-K of July 23, 2026).
Byline Bancorp is a well-run bank wearing three very good labels, and all three repay a second look. "Record profit" is true — $130.1 million in 2025, clean credit, a 4.22 percent margin most regional banks cannot reach — but the return on tangible equity behind it fell two years running, from 16.46 to 13.47 percent, because capital is being stockpiled for the next takeover; only the first half of 2026 turned it back up, to 14.47 percent. "Government guaranteed" is true and conditional: the SBA can claw back losses from technical deficiencies, and against that the bank holds no reserves. And the market's favorite label, the SBA gain-on-sale story, is simply wrong — those gains are 5.1 percent of revenue and shrinking, while the government's real contribution hides in a 7.07 percent loan yield. At about 1.5 times tangible book, the price says the returns will hold; the filings say they fell for two years and only just started rising again. Not investment advice.
- BY reached our research list via the Reddit hype scanner (ApeWisdom, 3 mentions in 24 hours, as of July 16, 2026) — the silence is the point: a 45 percent twelve-month run with no forum interest at all.
- Our in-house stock scanner is calibrated for industrial companies and rates a bank poorly by construction: BY appears in exactly 1 of our lists (KCF ranking, price-to-cash-flow 9.9), while the price-to-earnings, price-to-book and debt-to-equity fields return no value for this row. For banks those metrics are noise anyway — deposits are raw material, not debt — which is why the same filters report debt-to-equity of 0.59 for Wintrust and 4.12 for JPMorgan. All bank-specific figures in this analysis come from the SEC filings, not the scanner. The lists are recalculated daily.
- Timing: the most recent periodic report is the quarterly report (10-Q) as of March 31, 2026, filed May 1, 2026. The second-quarter 2026 figures come from the current report (8-K) of July 23, 2026 and are unaudited; the corresponding 10-Q had not yet been filed as of July 28, 2026.
- Price and valuation figures are dated (about $37.48 as of July 15, 2026; market value roughly $1.7 billion, scanner and estimate data as of July 16, 2026); analyses are evergreen, daily prices are not a buy argument.
- Not evaluated because it does not change the picture: the current report (8-K) of May 22, 2026 on the renewal of a $15.0 million revolving line of credit with CIBC Bank USA through May 23, 2027 — 0.15 percent of total assets.
About the Company
Byline Bancorp, Inc. ist die Bankholding der Byline Bank, die verschiedene Bankprodukte und -dienstleistungen für kleine und mittlere Unternehmen, Gewerbeimmobilien und Finanzsponsoren sowie Privatkunden in den USA anbietet.
| Employees | 1,018 |
|---|---|
| Headquarters | Chicago, IL |
| Address | 180 North LaSalle Street, 60601 Chicago, United States |
| Phone | 773 244 7000 |
| Website | bylinebancorp.com |
| IPO Date | 30. Jun 2017 |
| ISIN | US1244111092 |
Management
| Name | Title | Birth Year |
|---|---|---|
| Roberto R. Herencia | Executive Chairman of the Board & CEO | 1960 |
| Thomas J. Bell III | Executive VP & CFO | 1966 |
| Thomas Abraham | President of Small Business Capital | 1966 |
| Maria Sherylle A. Olano | Senior VP & Chief Accounting Officer | 1979 |
| Nicolas Mando | Executive VP, Chief Technology & Operations Officer | 1973 |
| Brooks O. Rennie | Head of Investor Relations | 1994 |
| Brian F. Doran Esq. | Executive VP, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary | 1959 |
| Dana Rose | Executive VP & Chief Human Resources Officer | 1971 |
| Megan Biggam | Executive VP & Head of Community Banking | 1979 |
| John M. Barkidjija | Executive VP & Head of Commercial Real Estate and Specialty Finance | 1964 |
Executives per the latest required filings; titles kept in their original language. Source: fundamental data.
Chart
Interactive price chart (TradingView).
Data as of: July 31, 2026 · Source: fundamental data & SEC filings (annual and quarterly reports, 10-K/10-Q)
Note: pure fact-based analysis, not investment advice and not a solicitation to buy or sell. All figures without guarantee.