TickerGuard
Buy Day today: Good (62) Broad market participation · no major macro event
NFG

National Fuel Gas Company

Energy · Oil & Gas Integrated · listed since 1987

79.90$ -0.6% vs. previous close Closing price · As of: Sep 17, 2026
🔔 Watch stock
Add to watchlist

Stock Watch

Stock Watch will tell you what changes at National Fuel Gas Company.

Later $1 a month per stock — signing up is free, and you'll be the first to know when it launches.

Price history

Chart

Interactive price chart (TradingView).

52-week range: 75.90 $ to 96.30 $ · Last price: 79.90 $ (As of: September 17, 2026)

Key figures

Key figures at a glance

Every figure we hold for this stock, grouped by topic. The question mark next to a label explains what the number means.

Basics

Market Cap ?The value of the entire company on the market: share price times total shares outstanding. 7.6$B
Shares Outstanding ?Total number of shares issued. Price times share count gives market cap. 95m
Float ?Share of stock freely tradable on the market — not locked up in the hands of founders, insiders, or major shareholders. 98.6%
Beta ?Volatility versus the overall market: 1 = moves like the market, 2 = twice as much, under 1 = calmer than the market. 0.4

Performance

Perf. 1M ?Price performance over the last month. 0.60%
Perf. 3M ?Price performance over the last 3 months. -17.10%
Perf. 6M ?Price performance over the last 6 months. -2.50%
YTD Performance (%) ?Price performance since the start of the year (Year to Date). -3.20%
52-Week-High Distance ?How far the price sits below its highest point over the last 52 weeks. 0% means the stock is at its year high. -21.2%
Perf. 1Y ?Price performance over the last 12 months. -6.85%
Perf. 3Y ?Price performance over the last 3 years. 61.79%
Perf. 5Y ?Price performance over the last 5 years. 82.33%
Perf. 10Y ?Price performance over the last 10 years. 100.84%
Perf. Since Inception ?Price performance since the first available trading day (05/03/1973) — with a complete history, that is since the IPO. 13,820.54%

Technical Indicators

MA 38 Days ?Moving average of the last 38 trading days: the smoothed price path. A price above it signals short-term strength. 82.10$
MA 50 Days ?Moving average of the last 50 trading days — the most widely watched medium-term trend line. 81.80$
MA 200 Days ?Moving average of the last 200 trading days — the dividing line between a long-term uptrend and downtrend. 83.70$
RSI (14) ?Relative Strength Index over 14 days, scale 0 to 100: above 70 counts as overbought, below 30 as oversold. A hint on timing, not a verdict on the company. 38.7
Volatility 30 Days ?Price swings over the last 30 trading days, annualized. The higher the value, the more the price fluctuates. 16.3%
Volatility 250 Days ?Price swings over the last 250 trading days (roughly one market year), annualized. 20.3%

Calculated from the price history · as of 09/18/2026

Valuation

P/E ?Price-to-earnings ratio: how many years of profit does the stock cost? The lower, the cheaper the valuation. No earnings means no P/E. 11.2
Forward P/E ?P/E based on expected earnings for the next 12 months instead of past earnings — analysts' bet on the future. 10.2
PEG ?P/E divided by expected earnings growth: puts valuation in relation to growth. Around 1 is considered fair, well above that is pricey. 1.6
P/B ?Price-to-book ratio: market value relative to book equity. 2.0
P/S ?Price-to-sales ratio: market value divided by annual sales. Important for companies that aren't (yet) profitable. 3.0
EV/EBITDA ?Enterprise value including debt (EV) relative to operating profit before depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) — more comparable than P/E because debt counts too. Extreme values arise when EBITDA is near zero. 6.6
Price/FCF ?Market value divided by free cash flow: how many years of freely available cash does the stock cost? More honest than P/E because cash flow is harder to dress up. 34.4

Profitability

Gross Margin ?Gross margin: what's left of sales after only direct production costs are deducted — the product's pricing power. 63.2%
EBIT Margin ?EBIT margin: operating profit as a percentage of sales — the earning power of the core business before interest and taxes. 42.0%
Net Margin ?Net margin: what's left of sales as profit after ALL costs, interest, and taxes. 26.9%
Return on Equity ?Return on equity: how much profit does the company generate per year on shareholders' equity? 20.8%
Return on Assets ?Return on assets: how much profit the company generates from its total assets (equity and debt combined). 6.9%

Balance Sheet & Safety

Equity Ratio ?Equity ratio: equity as a share of total assets. The higher, the more resilient the balance sheet. 41.9%
Debt/Equity ?Leverage ratio: financial debt divided by equity. Under 1 is generally seen as solid; negative values mean negative equity. 0.6
Altman Z″ ?Edward Altman's bankruptcy early-warning score. We use the Z″ variant, built from four balance-sheet ratios — it is designed for service companies and non-manufacturers and uses book value instead of market value. On that scale: below 1.1 = danger zone, 2.6 and up = safe zone, in between a grey area. Because the classic Altman Z is calculated differently, the two numbers are not directly comparable. The formula does not fit banks, insurers, or real-estate stocks. 5.41
Piotroski ?Balance-sheet health check by Joseph Piotroski: 9 yes/no criteria on profit, cash flow, leverage, and efficiency. 7+ is very solid, under 3 is a red flag. 7 out of 9

Growth

Sales Growth Last Quarter ?Sales growth in the most recently reported quarter versus the same quarter a year ago (YoY). 17.60%
EPS Growth Last Quarter ?Growth in earnings per share in the most recently reported quarter versus the same quarter a year ago (YoY). 9.30%
Sales Growth (Year) ?Sales growth in the last fiscal year versus the year before. 17.11%
Forward Sales Growth ?Sales growth analysts expect over the next 12 months — an estimate, not a guarantee. 17.49%
Forward EPS Growth ?Earnings-per-share growth analysts expect over the next 12 months — an estimate, not a guarantee. 7.00%

Dividend

Dividend Yield ?Annual dividend divided by the current price: what percentage of your investment comes back as a payout each year. 2.72%
Dividend Per Share (TTM) ?Sum of dividends paid per share over the last 12 months. 2.16$
Payout Ratio ?Share of profit paid out as dividends. Over 100% means the company is paying out more than it earns — not sustainable long-term. 28.7%
Years Without a Cut ?How many years in a row the dividend hasn't been cut — a measure of reliability. 32Years
Increase Streak ?How many years in a row the dividend has been raised — the gold standard for dividend payers. 32Years

Quality & Screener

Stage ?Weinstein phases 1 through 4: 1 = basing, 2 = uptrend (the only buy phase), 3 = topping, 4 = downtrend. Measured against the 30-week line. 1
RS Rating ?Relative strength from 1 to 99: an RS of 95 means the stock has outperformed 95% of all stocks. 22
EPS Rating ?Earnings growth rating from 1 to 99 versus all stocks — high values mean above-average earnings growth. 58
Fundamental Rating ?Our own Fundamental Rating: 0 to 100 points with an A+ to F grade. 50 points is the average across the universe, 100 the best possible score. It scores growth, earnings surprises, analyst estimates, margins, cash flow, and balance-sheet safety — every stock percentile-ranked against all others. Grades: A+ from 95, A from 75, B from 55, C from 45, D from 25, E from 5, F below. B (59 out of 100)

Comparison

Industry comparison

The stock alongside the largest companies in the same group. The median row is the middle value of the companies shown above — not of the whole industry.

Industry: Oil & Gas Integrated

Industry comparison
Company Market cap ($B) P/E EV/EBITDA Gross Margin % EBIT Margin % Sales Growth (Year) % Perf. 1Y %
National Fuel Gas Company NFG 7.6 11.2 6.6 63.2 42.0 17.1 -6.9
Exxon Mobil Corp XOM 670.8 27.6 9.4 29.8 6.4 -4.5 45.7
Chevron Corp CVX 421.4 36.6 8.0 44.3 7.3 -4.6 37.4
Petroleo Brasileiro Petrobras SA PBR 134.9 5.4 3.4 50.6 32.0 -3.6 73.8
BP PLC ADR BP 116.9 21.7 3.7 28.3 13.2 0.1 38.6
Eni SpA E 80.2 12.3 4.1 21.5 10.7 -7.5 63.8
Ecopetrol SA EC 35.9 11.4 7.5 32.8 0.0 -16.4 95.4
YPF Sociedad Anonima YPF 21.3 4.0 35.6 27.6 48.3 97.2
Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A. TGS 4.4 14.5 5.5 55.0 49.7 63.0 32.1
Median of companies shown 80.2 13.4 5.5 35.6 13.2 -3.6 45.7

Based on the most recently reported figures. Only stocks from the same trading venue are lined up, so the market caps are counted in one currency. Compare in a chart →

Fiscal years

Annual Figures

Fiscal years from the audited annual reports, oldest first. EBIT is the operating profit before interest and taxes; total assets are everything the company owns.

Revenue, operating income and net income per fiscal year $M

Revenue Operating income Net income

2016 · Revenue: 1,452 $M 2016 · Operating income: -417 $M 2016 · Net income: -291 $M 2017 · Revenue: 1,580 $M 2017 · Operating income: 594 $M 2017 · Net income: 283 $M 2018 · Revenue: 1,593 $M 2018 · Operating income: 520 $M 2018 · Net income: 392 $M 2019 · Revenue: 1,693 $M 2019 · Operating income: 512 $M 2019 · Net income: 304 $M 2020 · Revenue: 1,546 $M 2020 · Operating income: 30 $M 2020 · Net income: -124 $M 2021 · Revenue: 1,743 $M 2021 · Operating income: 640 $M 2021 · Net income: 364 $M 2022 · Revenue: 2,186 $M 2022 · Operating income: 815 $M 2022 · Net income: 566 $M 2023 · Revenue: 2,174 $M 2023 · Operating income: 755 $M 2023 · Net income: 477 $M 2024 · Revenue: 1,945 $M 2024 · Operating income: 210 $M 2024 · Net income: 78 $M 2025 · Revenue: 2,278 $M 2025 · Operating income: 813 $M 2025 · Net income: 519 $M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Annual Figures
Fiscal Year Revenue ($M) EBIT ($M) Net Income ($M) EPS ($) Operating Cash Flow ($M) Equity ($M) Total Assets ($M)
2016 1,452 -417 -291 -3.43 589 1,527 5,636
2017 1,580 594 283 3.30 685 1,704 6,103
2018 1,593 520 392 4.53 615 1,937 6,036
2019 1,693 512 304 3.51 694 2,139 6,462
2020 1,546 30 -124 -1.41 741 1,972 7,221
2021 1,743 640 364 3.97 792 1,786 7,465
2022 2,186 815 566 6.15 813 2,080 7,896
2023 2,174 755 477 5.17 1,237 2,963 8,280
2024 1,945 210 78 0.84 1,066 2,848 8,320
2025 2,278 813 519 5.68 1,100 3,095 8,719

Quarters

Quarterly Figures

Each bar is one quarter, the last one is the most recent. Use the switch to step through the individual figures.

Revenue & Profit

Cash Flow

Balance Sheet

Margins

Per Share

Click the chart or tab into it, then use ← and → to step through the periods.

None of the selected stocks reports this metric. Pick another metric or switch between annual and quarterly.

These companies report in different currencies — switch on “Indexed” or pick a margin for a fair comparison.

The figures could not be loaded right now.

Sales Per Quarter ($M)
2024: Q4 · 549.5 $M Q4 2025: Q1 · 730.0 $M Q1 2025: Q2 · 531.8 $M Q2 2025: Q3 · 466.3 $M Q3 2025: Q4 · 651.5 $M Q4 2026: Q1 · 858.4 $M Q1 2026: Q2 · 537.5 $M Q2

Source: fundamental data

Quarterly Figures
Quarter EPS (Earnings Per Share) EPS YoY (%) Sales ($M) Sales YoY (%) Net Margin (%) OCF ($M) FCF ($M)
2024: Q4 0.49 -65.80 550 4.60 8.20 220 -20
2025: Q1 2.37 32.00 730 15.90 29.60 254 60
2025: Q2 1.64 532 27.40 28.20 388 195
2025: Q3 1.18 466 25.30 23.50 238 -48
2025: Q4 1.98 301.50 652 18.60 27.90 275 -3
2026: Q1 2.59 9.10 858 17.60 28.90 382 162
2026: Q2 1.45 -11.60 538 1.10 25.80 377 111

What Do These Terms Mean?

EPS (Earnings Per Share):
Quarterly profit divided by the total share count — how much of the profit works out to a single share.
YoY (Year over Year):
Change versus the same quarter a year ago — this is how you compare without seasonal distortion (e.g. the holiday shopping season).
Sales:
All revenue for the quarter, before any costs are deducted — the top line of the income statement.
Net Margin:
What percentage of sales is left over as profit in the end. Negative means the company is posting a loss.
OCF (Operating Cash Flow):
The cash that actually flows into the till from the core business during the quarter — harder to dress up than book profit.
FCF (Free Cash Flow):
Operating cash flow minus capital expenditures — the money that's genuinely free to use, say for paying down debt, buybacks, or dividends.

Compare with other stocks →

Screening

Appears in These Scanners

This stock currently matches 9 of our scanner strategies — each hit links to the scanner.

Quality & Balance Sheet

Aktien.Guide

Breakout & Setup

Dividends

Momentum & Trend

Only genuine hits from verified scanners count; pure ranking metrics (P/E, P/S, and similar, which just sort the whole universe) don't count as a hit. View all scanners

Outlook

Analysts & Price Target

Combined picture of the price targets and recommendations of every analyst covering the stock. Price targets are expectations for the next 12 months, not promises — and they often follow the price rather than predict it.

Consensus Sell 1 = Strong buy … 5 = Strong sell
Analyst Ratings 4
Price Target (average) 92.00$
Distance to price 15.1% The price target sits 15.1% above the current price.

Distribution of Recommendations

Strong Buy 2
Buy 0
Hold 2
Sell 0
Strong Sell 0

Estimates by Fiscal Year

Estimates by Fiscal Year
Fiscal Year EPS Estimate ($) EPS Range ($) Revenue Estimate ($M) Expected Growth Analysts
09/30/2026 7.27 7.05 – 7.50 2,550 5.3% 5
09/30/2027 7.52 6.75 – 8.14 3,011 3.4% 5

Average of the analyst estimates for the coming fiscal years. The range shows how far the most optimistic and the most cautious estimate sit apart — the wider it is, the less certain the expectation.

Valuation

What is priced in?

Instead of guessing what the stock is worth, we turn the question around: what free cash flow growth has to happen for today’s market value to add up? The assumptions behind it can be moved.

Today’s market value implies roughly 15.1% growth in free cash flow per year over ten years (assumptions: discount rate 10.0%, terminal growth 2.5%).

What is priced in?
Free cash flow (last twelve months) $222.3M
Market cap $7.65B
Free cash flow in year ten $905.9M
Terminal value as a share of market value 62.4%

It shows which assumption is built into today’s price, not whether that assumption will hold. Every assumption can be changed with the sliders; the figures move with them.

A simplified model calculation — not a forecast and not a recommendation.

AI classification

AI Rating

Neutral

National Fuel Gas verkauft keine KI-Produkte und weist auch keinen KI-gestützten Kernprozess aus. In den Berichten taucht künstliche Intelligenz ausschließlich im Risikoteil auf — als zusätzliche Angriffsfläche für Datenschutz- und Cybervorfälle durch die Einführung generativer KI-Werkzeuge. Eine indirekte Verbindung besteht auf der Nachfrageseite: Die Tochter Supply Corporation transportiert Erdgas zum im Bau befindlichen Kraftwerk Shippingport in Pennsylvania, das ein daneben entstehendes Rechenzentrum versorgen soll. Das ist Gastransport zu einem Stromerzeuger, kein eigenes KI-Geschäft — deshalb neutral.

View the full file — quotes, sources, reviewed filings
„In addition to existing risks and cybersecurity threats, the adoption of new technologies, including generative artificial intelligence tools, may increase the Company’s exposure to data breaches and cybersecurity incidents or the Company’s ability to detect and remediate effects of breaches and cybersecurity incidents."

Zusätzlich zu den bestehenden Risiken und Cyberbedrohungen kann die Einführung neuer Technologien, einschließlich generativer Werkzeuge künstlicher Intelligenz, die Anfälligkeit des Unternehmens für Datenschutzverletzungen und Cybervorfälle erhöhen oder seine Fähigkeit beeinträchtigen, Auswirkungen von Verletzungen und Cybervorfällen zu erkennen und zu beheben.

10-K · 2025-11-21 · View SEC filing

„The impact of information technology disruptions, cybersecurity or data security breaches, including the impact of issues that may arise from the use of artificial intelligence technologies;"

Die Auswirkungen von Störungen der Informationstechnik sowie von Cyber- oder Datensicherheitsverletzungen, einschließlich der Auswirkungen von Problemen, die sich aus dem Einsatz von Technologien künstlicher Intelligenz ergeben können;

10-Q · 2026-04-30 · View SEC filing

„Supply Corporation has also announced that it expects to serve as the transporter of natural gas supplies to the Shippingport Power Station, a natural gas power generation facility under development in Beaver County, Pennsylvania, which will support a co-located data center that is currently under development."

Supply Corporation hat außerdem angekündigt, dass sie voraussichtlich als Transporteur von Erdgaslieferungen an das Kraftwerk Shippingport auftreten wird — eine in Beaver County, Pennsylvania, im Bau befindliche Erdgas-Stromerzeugungsanlage, die ein daneben entstehendes Rechenzentrum versorgen soll.

10-Q · 2026-04-30 · View SEC filing

Filings Reviewed: 10-Q 2026-04-30 · 10-Q 2026-01-29 · 10-K 2025-11-21 · 8-K 2026-06-26 · 8-K 2026-06-10 · 8-K 2026-05-27 · 8-K 2026-05-26

Rated on July 29, 2026 · How the Rating Is Built

Earnings calls

What the Earnings Calls Reveal

Between the first quarter of 2024 and the second quarter of 2026, National Fuel Gas delivered on most operational fronts: earnings guidance for the two completed fiscal years was met or clearly exceeded, the regulated utility acquisition flagged since 2024 was signed, and both pipeline expansion projects are on schedule. What stands out is the handling of one shareholder commitment: the 200 million dollar buyback launched in the second quarter of 2024 was supposed to be finished in fiscal 2025, was pushed back twice and has not been mentioned in any call since the fourth quarter of 2025, while the company issued 350 million dollars of new stock in December 2025. Management explained both postponements, but never the fate of the program itself. The core message repeated for two years, more production on less capital, also cracked for the first time in fiscal 2026. We therefore rate the communication as conspicuous, without implying operational weakness.

Red flags Buyback pledge broken 9 calls reviewed, 2024-Q1 through 2026-Q2 · As of August 3, 2026

Buyback postponed twice, then no longer mentioned

In the second quarter 2024 call management announced a 200 million dollar share buyback. In the third quarter 2024 call it said the program would be completed by the end of fiscal 2025, with roughly 45 million dollars repurchased at that point. The fourth quarter 2024 call confirmed completion within fiscal 2025, the second quarter 2025 call moved the target to the end of calendar 2025, and the third quarter 2025 call moved it to 2026. Both postponements were explained on the call, first with broad macroeconomic uncertainty in the spring of 2025, then with the priority of growth opportunities over capital return that management has described in the same words for years. That growth opportunity did arrive in the form of the Ohio acquisition. What is missing is the closing statement: from the fourth quarter 2025 call onward the program is not mentioned again, neither as a commitment nor as a cancellation, while according to the first quarter 2026 call the company placed 350 million dollars of new stock in December 2025 to fund the acquisition. The fiscal 2025 completion date was stated unconditionally and was missed.

Fiscal 2026 growth promise cut, capital at the top end

In the third quarter 2025 call management projected six percent production growth on four percent less capital for fiscal 2026, specifically 440 to 455 Bcf of production and 470 to 500 million dollars of Seneca capital. That production range was explicitly reaffirmed in the fourth quarter 2025 and first quarter 2026 calls. In the second quarter 2026 call it was cut by three percent to 425 to 440 Bcf, leaving the midpoint just over one percent above the 427 Bcf actually produced the year before. Management did give reasons: snow and road closures in January and February cost five Bcf in the quarter alone and shift volumes into later periods, and four wells of an older design are underperforming. The combined segment capital range stayed at 560 to 610 million dollars, but management said it was trending towards the high end, after 605 million dollars in the prior year, citing extra wells from faster drilling crews and higher diesel and oil prices caused by the Iran conflict. The bottom line: for the first time since 2023 no capital efficiency gain is visible in fiscal 2026, while management continues to guide to mid single digit production growth for the coming years.

Weak wells disclosed only with the guidance cut

In most of the calls over these two years management said well results were exceeding expectations. Only in the second quarter 2026 call did it disclose that four of six wells on a pad in northwest Tioga County are underperforming projections. The same call supplies the explanation, and it holds up: the pad was drilled about 18 months earlier mainly to hold an almost 20,000 acre parcel of land, before the 3D seismic shoot and before today's subsurface model. The two wells with current designs on the same pad are performing as expected. The transcript does not date the start-up precisely, only last autumn, which may well be after the call held on 6 November 2025. What stands is this: in the call of 29 January 2026 the production outlook was reaffirmed and further productivity gains were promised, and the weak wells only came up three months later, together with the guidance cut.

Pipeline rate case later than expected in 2024

In the second quarter 2024 call the chief executive said that, given the level of modernisation investment, the FERC regulated Supply Corporation would likely file another rate case within the next year. That was phrased as an expectation rather than a firm commitment, and it concerned a decision entirely at the company's discretion: the 2024 settlement contained no stay-out provision, so it could have filed at any time. The filing was made on the day of the second quarter 2026 call, seeking an increase of roughly 95 million dollars, about a year after the window originally named. The slippage was not hidden: as early as the third quarter 2024 call management said fiscal 2025 guidance contained no further FERC rate case impacts, and from the third quarter 2025 call onward the timing was restated in every call, first fiscal 2026, then the second half of the year, then later in the year, each time justified by modernisation spending and cost inflation. Economically the delay mainly pushed revenue into later periods.

What management did deliver cleanly

The counterweight belongs in the picture. Fiscal 2024 earnings guidance was cut to 4.75 to 5.05 dollars per share in the second quarter 2024 call, raised again to 5.00 to 5.10 dollars in the third quarter 2024 call, and met with a reported quarterly total of roughly 5.01 dollars. For fiscal 2025 the first guidance, issued in the third quarter 2024 call, was 5.75 to 6.25 dollars, and the company delivered a 38 percent increase to roughly 6.90 dollars. The commitment made in the first quarter 2024 call to tighten Seneca capital guidance after one more quarter was honoured twice, downward, in the second and third quarter 2024 calls. The intention to acquire on the regulated side, repeated from the second quarter 2024 call onward, led to the Ohio utility purchase announced in the fourth quarter 2025 call. And the Tioga Pathway pipeline project is holding the late 2026 in service date first named in the second quarter 2024 call, while the Shippingport project announced only in the third quarter 2025 call is on plan as well.

Management promises

  • 2024-Q3 — The 200 million dollar share buyback program will be completed by the end of fiscal 2025. Reaffirmed in the fourth quarter 2024 call, moved to end of calendar 2025 in the second quarter 2025 call citing market uncertainty, then to 2026 in the third quarter 2025 call in favour of potential acquisitions. Not completed as of the second quarter 2026 call. broken
  • 2025-Q3 — Should the growth opportunities under review not materialise, the buyback program will be completed in 2026. The condition was met: the growth opportunity arrived in the form of the Ohio acquisition, so this commitment was not broken. What remains open is the fate of the program, unmentioned in three consecutive calls since, while the company issued 350 million dollars of new stock in December 2025 to fund the acquisition. open
  • 2025-Q3 — Fiscal 2026 production of 440 to 455 Bcf on roughly four percent less capital. Reaffirmed twice, then cut to 425 to 440 Bcf in the second quarter 2026 call. Blamed on weather and road closures shifting volumes into later periods, plus four underperforming wells of an older design. Capital is trending towards the high end of the range. broken
  • 2024-Q2 — A new rate case for the Supply Corporation pipeline business will likely be filed within a year. Phrased as an expectation, not a firm commitment. The filing was made on the day of the second quarter 2026 call, roughly a year after the window originally named. The revised timing was restated in every call from the third quarter 2025 onward and justified by modernisation spending and cost inflation. broken
  • 2024-Q1 — After one more quarter the Seneca capital guidance range will be tightened. Delivered and then some: the upper bound was cut in both the second and third quarter 2024 calls, and the fiscal year finished at the low end of the range. kept
  • 2025-Q2 — Acquisitions are to happen on the regulated side, most likely a local gas distribution company. Made concrete in the fourth quarter 2025 call as the purchase of the Ohio gas utility, with closing planned for the fourth calendar quarter of 2026. Financing was largely in place as of the second quarter 2026 call. kept
  • 2024-Q2 — The Tioga Pathway pipeline project will go into service in late calendar 2026. The date has held across nine calls. Approval in May 2025, construction start in spring 2026, and a November 2026 target confirmed in the second quarter 2026 call. open

Based on public earnings call transcripts. Reviewed: 9 transcripts 2024-Q1 through 2026-Q2.

Growth

Growth Score

Ten checks against the annual reports — each one passed counts a point.

6 of 10 Solid growth
  • Revenue grows by more than 15% a year over three years 1.4%
  • More than 10% revenue growth is expected for the coming year 17.5%
  • Share count grows by less than 3% a year -0.3%
  • Revenue growth plus cash-flow margin add up to at least 40 ("Rule of 40") 25.3%
  • Gross margin at 40% or higher and without meaningful erosion 66.1%
  • Goodwill from acquisitions does not grow faster than revenue 0.1%
  • Net debt below twice EBITDA 2.1 x EBITDA
  • Operating cash flow covers the profits of the last three years 2,330 m
  • Return on capital at 15% or higher, or up versus two years ago 10.4%
  • Insiders hold at least 10% or are net buyers 1.3%

A criterion without figures counts neither as passed nor as failed; a score is only produced from 7 judgeable criteria upwards. Source: fundamental data. All ten criteria in detail

Quality check

AAQS

6/10

The AAQS (AlleAktien Quality Score) checks 10 quality criteria on growth, profitability, and balance-sheet strength — per the methodology developed and published by AlleAktien, calculated by us from our own fundamental data. A stock counts as a quality stock from 9 out of 10 points. Where a company has a shorter listing history, we calculate over the fiscal years available (at least five).

  • Sales growth 10Y > 5% 5.1%
  • Exp. sales growth 3Y > 5% 15.0%
  • EBIT growth 10Y > 5%
  • Exp. EBIT growth 3Y > 5% 15.0%
  • Net debt < 4x EBIT 3.4x
  • EBIT positive, 10Y straight 9
  • Max. EBIT decline < 50% 95.0%
  • Return on equity > 15% 16.8%
  • ROCE > 15% 10.4%
  • Expected return > 10% 17.8%

View stocks with the full AAQS score · Read the methodology at AlleAktien

Source: fundamental data

The company

About the Company

National Fuel Gas Company ist ein diversifiziertes Energieunternehmen. Es ist in den Segmenten Integrated Upstream and Gathering, Pipeline and Storage sowie Utility tätig.

Employees
2,322
Headquarters
Williamsville, NY
Address
6363 Main Street, 14221 Williamsville, United States
Phone
716 857 7000
IPO Date
09/01/1987
ISIN
US6361801011
Stock Split
2:1 on 09/10/2001

Management

Management
Name Title Birth Year
David P. Bauer President, CEO & Director 1969
Timothy J. Silverstein CFO & Treasurer 1984
Martin A. Krebs Chief Information Officer 1971
Justin I. Loweth Senior Vice President 1979
Joseph N. Del Vecchio President of National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation & Empire Pipeline, Inc 1967
Elena G. Mendel Controller & Chief Accounting Officer 1967
Lee E. Hartz General Counsel & Corporate Secretary 1977
Kevin J. Gilbert Chief Information Security Officer of National Fuel Gas Distribution Corporation
Michael D. Colpoys President of National Fuel Gas Distribution Corporation 1965
Natalie M. Fischer Director of Investor Relations

Executives per the latest required filings; titles kept in their original language. Source: fundamental data.

Filings

Company Filings (8-K)

An 8-K is the filing a US company must use to disclose material events immediately — takeovers, changes at the top, major contracts or payment troubles, for instance. The links open the original document at the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

  • 08/11/2026 NATIONAL FUEL GAS CO (NFG): Other Events; Financial Statements and Exhibits SEC ↗
  • 07/30/2026 NATIONAL FUEL GAS CO (NFG): Results of Operations and Financial Condition; Financial Statements and Exhibits SEC ↗
  • 07/29/2026 NATIONAL FUEL GAS CO (NFG): Regulation FD Disclosure; Financial Statements and Exhibits SEC ↗

Data as of: September 17, 2026 · Source: fundamental data & SEC filings (annual and quarterly reports, 10-K/10-Q)

Note: pure fact-based analysis, not investment advice and not a solicitation to buy or sell. All figures without guarantee.

Was this page helpful to you?