TickerGuard
Buy Day today: Neutral (51) Mixed market breadth · no major macro event
JOE

St Joe Company

Real Estate · Real Estate - Diversified · listed since 1992

63.80$ -0.1% vs. previous close Closing price · As of: Sep 18, 2026
🔔 Watch stock
Add to watchlist

Stock Watch

Stock Watch will tell you what changes at St Joe Company.

Later $1 a month per stock — signing up is free, and you'll be the first to know when it launches.

Price history

Chart

Interactive price chart (TradingView).

52-week range: 46.90 $ to 72.80 $ · Last price: 63.80 $ (As of: September 18, 2026)

Key figures

Key figures at a glance

Every figure we hold for this stock, grouped by topic. The question mark next to a label explains what the number means.

Basics

Market Cap ?The value of the entire company on the market: share price times total shares outstanding. 3.6$B
Shares Outstanding ?Total number of shares issued. Price times share count gives market cap. 57m
Float ?Share of stock freely tradable on the market — not locked up in the hands of founders, insiders, or major shareholders. 96.3%
Beta ?Volatility versus the overall market: 1 = moves like the market, 2 = twice as much, under 1 = calmer than the market. 1.3

Performance

Perf. 1M ?Price performance over the last month. -1.70%
Perf. 3M ?Price performance over the last 3 months. 2.80%
Perf. 6M ?Price performance over the last 6 months. 7.30%
YTD Performance (%) ?Price performance since the start of the year (Year to Date). 12.20%
52-Week-High Distance ?How far the price sits below its highest point over the last 52 weeks. 0% means the stock is at its year high. -9.3%
Perf. 1Y ?Price performance over the last 12 months. 25.38%
Perf. 3Y ?Price performance over the last 3 years. 15.15%
Perf. 5Y ?Price performance over the last 5 years. 55.62%
Perf. 10Y ?Price performance over the last 10 years. 276.74%
Perf. Since Inception ?Price performance since the first available trading day (03/23/1990) — with a complete history, that is since the IPO. 749.24%

Technical Indicators

MA 38 Days ?Moving average of the last 38 trading days: the smoothed price path. A price above it signals short-term strength. 66.00$
MA 50 Days ?Moving average of the last 50 trading days — the most widely watched medium-term trend line. 64.90$
MA 200 Days ?Moving average of the last 200 trading days — the dividing line between a long-term uptrend and downtrend. 65.20$
RSI (14) ?Relative Strength Index over 14 days, scale 0 to 100: above 70 counts as overbought, below 30 as oversold. A hint on timing, not a verdict on the company. 41.4
Volatility 30 Days ?Price swings over the last 30 trading days, annualized. The higher the value, the more the price fluctuates. 26.8%
Volatility 250 Days ?Price swings over the last 250 trading days (roughly one market year), annualized. 30.0%

Calculated from the price history · as of 09/18/2026

Valuation

P/E ?Price-to-earnings ratio: how many years of profit does the stock cost? The lower, the cheaper the valuation. No earnings means no P/E.
Forward P/E ?P/E based on expected earnings for the next 12 months instead of past earnings — analysts' bet on the future. 50.3
PEG ?P/E divided by expected earnings growth: puts valuation in relation to growth. Around 1 is considered fair, well above that is pricey.
P/B ?Price-to-book ratio: market value relative to book equity.
P/S ?Price-to-sales ratio: market value divided by annual sales. Important for companies that aren't (yet) profitable. 6.6
EV/EBITDA ?Enterprise value including debt (EV) relative to operating profit before depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) — more comparable than P/E because debt counts too. Extreme values arise when EBITDA is near zero. 17.0
Price/FCF ?Market value divided by free cash flow: how many years of freely available cash does the stock cost? More honest than P/E because cash flow is harder to dress up. 17.5

Profitability

Gross Margin ?Gross margin: what's left of sales after only direct production costs are deducted — the product's pricing power. 44.1%
EBIT Margin ?EBIT margin: operating profit as a percentage of sales — the earning power of the core business before interest and taxes. 18.4%
Net Margin ?Net margin: what's left of sales as profit after ALL costs, interest, and taxes. 22.5%
Return on Equity ?Return on equity: how much profit does the company generate per year on shareholders' equity? 14.9%
Return on Assets ?Return on assets: how much profit the company generates from its total assets (equity and debt combined). 6.8%

Balance Sheet & Safety

Equity Ratio ?Equity ratio: equity as a share of total assets. The higher, the more resilient the balance sheet. 50.5%
Debt/Equity ?Leverage ratio: financial debt divided by equity. Under 1 is generally seen as solid; negative values mean negative equity.
Altman Z″ ?Edward Altman's bankruptcy early-warning score. We use the Z″ variant, built from four balance-sheet ratios — it is designed for service companies and non-manufacturers and uses book value instead of market value. On that scale: below 1.1 = danger zone, 2.6 and up = safe zone, in between a grey area. Because the classic Altman Z is calculated differently, the two numbers are not directly comparable. The formula does not fit banks, insurers, or real-estate stocks. 6.71
Piotroski ?Balance-sheet health check by Joseph Piotroski: 9 yes/no criteria on profit, cash flow, leverage, and efficiency. 7+ is very solid, under 3 is a red flag. 7 out of 9

Growth

Sales Growth Last Quarter ?Sales growth in the most recently reported quarter versus the same quarter a year ago (YoY). 5.10%
EPS Growth Last Quarter ?Growth in earnings per share in the most recently reported quarter versus the same quarter a year ago (YoY). -19.90%
Sales Growth (Year) ?Sales growth in the last fiscal year versus the year before. 27.46%
Forward Sales Growth ?Sales growth analysts expect over the next 12 months — an estimate, not a guarantee.
Forward EPS Growth ?Earnings-per-share growth analysts expect over the next 12 months — an estimate, not a guarantee.

Dividend

Dividend Yield ?Annual dividend divided by the current price: what percentage of your investment comes back as a payout each year. 0.99%
Dividend Per Share (TTM) ?Sum of dividends paid per share over the last 12 months. 0.62$
Payout Ratio ?Share of profit paid out as dividends. Over 100% means the company is paying out more than it earns — not sustainable long-term. 29.9%
Years Without a Cut ?How many years in a row the dividend hasn't been cut — a measure of reliability. 5Years
Increase Streak ?How many years in a row the dividend has been raised — the gold standard for dividend payers. 5Years

Quality & Screener

Stage ?Weinstein phases 1 through 4: 1 = basing, 2 = uptrend (the only buy phase), 3 = topping, 4 = downtrend. Measured against the 30-week line. 2
RS Rating ?Relative strength from 1 to 99: an RS of 95 means the stock has outperformed 95% of all stocks. 61
EPS Rating ?Earnings growth rating from 1 to 99 versus all stocks — high values mean above-average earnings growth. 23
Fundamental Rating ?Our own Fundamental Rating: 0 to 100 points with an A+ to F grade. 50 points is the average across the universe, 100 the best possible score. It scores growth, earnings surprises, analyst estimates, margins, cash flow, and balance-sheet safety — every stock percentile-ranked against all others. Grades: A+ from 95, A from 75, B from 55, C from 45, D from 25, E from 5, F below. B (66 out of 100)

Comparison

Industry comparison

The stock alongside the largest companies in the same group. The median row is the middle value of the companies shown above — not of the whole industry.

Sector comparison: Real Estate

Industry comparison
Company Market cap ($B) P/E EV/EBITDA Gross Margin % EBIT Margin % Sales Growth (Year) % Perf. 1Y %
St Joe Company JOE 3.6 17.0 44.1 18.4 27.5 25.4
Welltower Inc WELL 161.6 113.3 63.8 39.6 18.0 35.8 39.5
Prologis Inc PLD 126.3 33.9 19.2 75.6 38.5 7.2 20.8
Equinix Inc EQIX 100.7 70.8 27.7 52.0 24.3 5.9 32.8
American Tower Corp AMT 81.1 29.5 17.0 73.8 45.9 5.1 -6.4
Simon Property Group Inc SPG 78.0 14.5 11.4 81.4 43.4 6.7 19.3
Digital Realty Trust Inc DLR 65.3 48.9 26.9 57.0 17.2 10.0 9.3
Realty Income Corporation O 52.3 47.9 17.0 92.7 45.5 9.1 1.2
Public Storage PSA 51.9 31.6 19.6 74.4 46.0 2.7 8.7
Median of companies shown 78.0 40.9 19.2 73.8 38.5 7.2 19.3

Based on the most recently reported figures. Only stocks from the same trading venue are lined up, so the market caps are counted in one currency. Compare in a chart →

Fiscal years

Annual Figures

Fiscal years from the audited annual reports, oldest first. EBIT is the operating profit before interest and taxes; total assets are everything the company owns.

Revenue, operating income and net income per fiscal year $M

Revenue Operating income Net income

2016 · Revenue: 96 $M 2016 · Operating income: 2 $M 2016 · Net income: 16 $M 2017 · Revenue: 99 $M 2017 · Operating income: 2 $M 2017 · Net income: 60 $M 2018 · Revenue: 110 $M 2018 · Operating income: 29 $M 2018 · Net income: 32 $M 2019 · Revenue: 127 $M 2019 · Operating income: 31 $M 2019 · Net income: 27 $M 2020 · Revenue: 161 $M 2020 · Operating income: 47 $M 2020 · Net income: 45 $M 2021 · Revenue: 267 $M 2021 · Operating income: 94 $M 2021 · Net income: 75 $M 2022 · Revenue: 252 $M 2022 · Operating income: 61 $M 2022 · Net income: 71 $M 2023 · Revenue: 389 $M 2023 · Operating income: 91 $M 2023 · Net income: 78 $M 2024 · Revenue: 403 $M 2024 · Operating income: 96 $M 2024 · Net income: 74 $M 2025 · Revenue: 513 $M 2025 · Operating income: 146 $M 2025 · Net income: 116 $M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Annual Figures
Fiscal Year Revenue ($M) EBIT ($M) Net Income ($M) EPS ($) Operating Cash Flow ($M) Equity ($M) Total Assets ($M)
2016 96 2 16 0.21 13 687 1,028
2017 99 2 60 0.84 56 593 921
2018 110 29 32 0.52 41 533 871
2019 127 31 27 0.45 30 520 909
2020 161 47 45 0.77 37 551 1,037
2021 267 94 75 1.27 112 607 1,208
2022 252 61 71 1.21 48 631 1,431
2023 389 91 78 1.33 104 683 1,524
2024 403 96 74 1.27 108 724 1,539
2025 513 146 116 2.01 191 766 1,518

Quarters

Quarterly Figures

Each bar is one quarter, the last one is the most recent. Use the switch to step through the individual figures.

Revenue & Profit

Cash Flow

Balance Sheet

Margins

Per Share

Click the chart or tab into it, then use ← and → to step through the periods.

None of the selected stocks reports this metric. Pick another metric or switch between annual and quarterly.

These companies report in different currencies — switch on “Indexed” or pick a margin for a fair comparison.

The figures could not be loaded right now.

Sales Per Quarter ($M)
2024: Q4 · 104.3 $M Q4 2025: Q1 · 94.2 $M Q1 2025: Q2 · 129.1 $M Q2 2025: Q3 · 161.1 $M Q3 2025: Q4 · 128.9 $M Q4 2026: Q1 · 99.0 $M Q1 2026: Q2 · 158.8 $M Q2

Source: fundamental data

Quarterly Figures
Quarter EPS (Earnings Per Share) EPS YoY (%) Sales ($M) Sales YoY (%) Net Margin (%) OCF ($M) FCF ($M)
2024: Q4 0.32 43.50 104 20.30 18.10 30 28
2025: Q1 0.30 25.70 94 7.30 18.50 29 23
2025: Q2 0.51 21.00 129 15.70 22.90 31 30
2025: Q3 0.67 131.80 161 62.70 24.00 86 85
2025: Q4 0.52 60.20 129 23.50 23.20 44 44
2026: Q1 0.24 -19.20 99 5.10 14.10 42 35
2026: Q2 0.71 39.20 159 23.00 25.50 44 43

What Do These Terms Mean?

EPS (Earnings Per Share):
Quarterly profit divided by the total share count — how much of the profit works out to a single share.
YoY (Year over Year):
Change versus the same quarter a year ago — this is how you compare without seasonal distortion (e.g. the holiday shopping season).
Sales:
All revenue for the quarter, before any costs are deducted — the top line of the income statement.
Net Margin:
What percentage of sales is left over as profit in the end. Negative means the company is posting a loss.
OCF (Operating Cash Flow):
The cash that actually flows into the till from the core business during the quarter — harder to dress up than book profit.
FCF (Free Cash Flow):
Operating cash flow minus capital expenditures — the money that's genuinely free to use, say for paying down debt, buybacks, or dividends.

Compare with other stocks →

Screening

Appears in These Scanners

This stock currently matches 9 of our scanner strategies — each hit links to the scanner.

Growth

Quality & Balance Sheet

Aktien.Guide

Breakout & Setup

Dividends

Momentum & Trend

Only genuine hits from verified scanners count; pure ranking metrics (P/E, P/S, and similar, which just sort the whole universe) don't count as a hit. View all scanners

Outlook

Analysts & Price Target

Combined picture of the price targets and recommendations of every analyst covering the stock. Price targets are expectations for the next 12 months, not promises — and they often follow the price rather than predict it.

Consensus
Analyst Ratings
Price Target (average) 19.00$
Distance to price -70.2% The price target sits 70.2% below the current price.

Valuation

What is priced in?

Instead of guessing what the stock is worth, we turn the question around: what free cash flow growth has to happen for today’s market value to add up? The assumptions behind it can be moved.

Today’s market value implies roughly 5.3% growth in free cash flow per year over ten years (assumptions: discount rate 10.0%, terminal growth 2.5%).

What is priced in?
Free cash flow (last twelve months) $215.3M
Market cap $3.61B
Free cash flow in year ten $361.0M
Terminal value as a share of market value 52.7%

It shows which assumption is built into today’s price, not whether that assumption will hold. Every assumption can be changed with the sliders; the figures move with them.

A simplified model calculation — not a forecast and not a recommendation.

AI classification

AI Rating

Neutral

Geprüft am 10.07.2026 gegen den Geschäftsbericht (10-K) Geschäftsjahr 2025 (eingereicht 25.02.2026), den jüngsten Quartalsbericht (10-Q) per 31.03.2026 sowie die DEF 14A 2026: In den ausgewerteten SEC-Filings der St. Joe Company findet sich kein wesentlicher KI-Bezug. St. Joe ist ein Immobilien-Entwickler und Grundbesitzer in Nordwest-Florida (Landbank rund 165.000 Acres, Segmente Immobilien/Hotellerie/Vermietung) — kein KI-Produkt, keine KI als Umsatzquelle, kein belegter operativer KI-Einsatz im Kerngeschaeft. Die einzigen Erwaehnungen von kuenstlicher Intelligenz stehen im Cybersecurity-Abschnitt (Item 1C) des 10-K: KI als Werkzeug von Angreifern sowie eine interne KI-/Generative-KI-Nutzungsrichtlinie fuer Mitarbeitende. Das ist eine generische Cybersecurity-Floskel plus eine Governance-Richtlinie, kein Geschaeftsmodell-Bezug und kein konkretes KI-Geschaeftsrisiko fuers eigene Modell. Nach dem Kriterienkatalog bleibt es damit bei „neutral“: St. Joe verkauft keine KI, nutzt sie nicht nachweisbar operativ und wird durch sie nicht erkennbar bedroht.

View the full file — quotes, sources, reviewed filings
„Additionally, the emergence of artificial intelligence has provided additional tools for those who perpetrate these attacks, including through social engineering, the development of customized malware, and an enhanced ability to evade detection."

Zudem hat das Aufkommen kuenstlicher Intelligenz denjenigen, die solche Angriffe verueben, zusaetzliche Werkzeuge an die Hand gegeben — unter anderem fuer Social Engineering, die Entwicklung massgeschneiderter Schadsoftware und eine verbesserte Faehigkeit, einer Entdeckung zu entgehen.

10-K · 2026-02-25 · View SEC filing

„… have established an Artificial Intelligence (“AI”) and Generative AI usage policy to establish guidelines for the acceptable and responsible use of AI and Generative AI tools by employees, contractors, and authorized third parties."

… haben wir eine Richtlinie zur Nutzung von kuenstlicher Intelligenz („KI“) und generativer KI eingefuehrt, um Leitlinien fuer den zulaessigen und verantwortungsvollen Einsatz von KI- und generativen KI-Werkzeugen durch Mitarbeitende, Auftragnehmer und autorisierte Dritte festzulegen.

10-K · 2026-02-25 · View SEC filing

Filings Reviewed: 10-Q 2026-04-29 · 10-Q 2025-10-29 · 10-Q 2025-07-23 · 10-Q 2025-04-23 · 10-K 2026-02-25 · 10-K 2025-02-26

Rated on July 10, 2026 · How the Rating Is Built

Earnings calls

What the Earnings Calls Reveal

The St. Joe Company only introduced quarterly calls in the summer of 2025; we reviewed all four transcripts available so far, from 2025-Q2 through 2026-Q1. Operationally the company delivers: full-year 2025 revenue rose 27 percent to 513.2 million dollars, earnings per share reached 2.00 dollars, and the large-scale builder for the Pigeon Creek plan, flagged as being in talks for three straight quarters, was signed with PulteGroup in 2026-Q1. The one soft spot is disclosure of its own targets: every question about a concrete target figure - growth of recurring revenue, capital spending, cash levels, a KPI framework - is answered across all four calls without a single number. Management does give reasons (project-by-project business, market dependence, facts and circumstances), but it never states outright that it does not provide guidance. On top of that, the metric it calls the most important one - the share of recurring revenue - is quoted against a different period in every call.

Red flags No target figures 4 calls reviewed, 2025-Q2 through 2026-Q1 · As of August 2, 2026

Five questions on targets, no number

In 2025-Q2 a shareholder asks for the growth target for recurring revenue over the next three to five years; the answer is that management cannot name an exact goal at this point and that it is project by project. In 2025-Q3 three further attempts follow: cumulative capital spending over the next three to five years, cash levels twelve to eighteen months out, and the cash level the company considers comfortable. The CEO answers the two cash questions with a reference to facts and circumstances and the spending question with a reference to its multifaceted capital allocation - none of them with a figure. In 2025-Q4 someone asks for the short- and long-term target share of recurring revenue; again the answer is only the intention to keep growing that share. Five questions about a target figure, five times no number. Management does give reasons, but in none of the four calls does it state outright that it provides no guidance as a matter of policy.

KPI framework requested, not promised

In 2025-Q3 a shareholder explicitly asks for a mid- and long-term financial framework with KPIs, revenue and cash flow targets, now that the business is running at a steadier rate. The CFO replies that the company will keep looking at its options and points to the additional schedules already added to the quarterly filing - no date and no commitment. The topic does not come up again in the 2025-Q4 or 2026-Q1 calls and no such framework was presented. Nothing was broken here, because nothing was promised. The same holds for the third-party valuation of the land and timber holdings described as in process in 2025-Q3: it was announced without a date and explicitly as work over time, and the comparable valuation of the operating properties had been presented at the May 2025 annual meeting. The next annual meeting was scheduled for 12 May 2026 and therefore falls after the last call reviewed.

Lead line drops net income

The prepared remarks of the 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3 and 2025-Q4 calls each lead with revenue and net income growth: 16 and 20 percent, then 63 and 130 percent, then 24 and 58 percent. In 2026-Q1 the opening sentence cites 5 percent revenue growth and 8 percent higher operating income. The 21 percent drop in net income follows four sentences later - with the figure, with the cause and in the same prepared remarks: equity in income from joint ventures fell to 3.5 from 10.2 million dollars, mainly on lower home closings at Latitude Margaritaville. The change of headline metric coincides with the first weak quarter, but nothing is withheld or dressed up. Nor are the gross margins quoted in 2026-Q1 a new theme: margins already featured in the prepared remarks in 2025-Q3 (homesites 53 versus 39 percent) and 2025-Q4 (homesites 51 versus 47, leasing 57 versus 54, hospitality 31 versus 32 percent).

Recurring revenue: three periods

Management calls the share of recurring revenue the most important part of its strategy - and quotes it in three of the four calls against a different reference period: 63 percent for the first half of 2025 (2025-Q2), 56 percent for the full year, set against 15 percent some 20 years ago (2025-Q4), and 60 percent for the quarter (2026-Q1); in 2025-Q3 the CFO gives absolute nine-month figures instead of a ratio. Each figure is correctly labelled on its own, but the calls alone do not allow a comparison over time. The gap between 63 percent for the half year and 56 percent for the full year is not addressed as such, yet it follows from the second half: the 41 million dollar sale of Watercrest and markedly higher homesite prices lifted transactional revenue faster than recurring revenue - both disclosed in the calls. The trade-off between monetising operating assets and growing recurring revenue is raised by the calls themselves: in 2025-Q3 management explicitly calls operating properties piggy banks that can be cashed in, and in 2026-Q1 it cites the Watercrest sale as an example of the deliberate exit from lower-margin leasing assets.

Buyback falls to a third

Buyback execution across the four calls: 10.1 million dollars in 2025-Q2, 8.7 million in 2025-Q3, 15.1 million in 2025-Q4 - according to the prepared remarks the highest quarterly figure of the year - then 5.0 million in 2026-Q1, less than both dividends (9.2 million) and debt reduction (10.9 million). The prepared remarks do not explain the drop and nobody asked. Two things belong in the picture: management calls repurchases a priority of capital allocation only in 2025-Q3, while in 2025-Q4 it calls them a component of capital allocation. And the swing had been flagged - as early as 2025-Q3 the CEO points out that the split varies from quarter to quarter and that buybacks are bound by trading windows and regulation; the yes to the 2025-Q4 question of whether buybacks are still prudent after a share price gain of roughly 40 percent is given in the transcript with exactly that caveat attached.

Pigeon Creek: delivered after three quarters

In 2025-Q2 the CEO reports talks with a large-scale builder interested in the entire Pigeon Creek plan - entitled for more than 3,000 residential units and more than 400,000 square feet of commercial space - and says a lot of progress has been made. In 2025-Q3 the update is that talks are ongoing with nothing specific to report; in 2025-Q4 management says it is pretty far along and cautiously optimistic. In 2026-Q1 the deal lands: a contract with PulteGroup, the third-largest homebuilder in the country and new to this market, for up to 2,653 homesites. Those 2,653 homesites cannot be netted against the more than 3,000 entitled residential units - homesites are single-family lots, while the plan also covers other residential formats and commercial space. No closing date had been promised in any call; management expects first revenue in early 2027.

Management promises

  • 2025-Q2 — Talks with a large-scale builder for the entire Pigeon Creek plan are to be converted into a deal. Delivered after three quarters of interim updates: 2026-Q1 reported a contract with PulteGroup for up to 2,653 homesites. That figure is not comparable with the more than 3,000 entitled residential units of the plan, which also covers commercial space and other residential formats. No date had ever been promised; management expects revenue from early 2027. kept
  • 2025-Q3 — Announcements about progress in attracting national apparel brands to the WaterSound Town Center are promised for the near future. No date was given; the announcement was promised for the near future. Neither the 2025-Q4 nor the 2026-Q1 call named a brand. Progress on the same space was reported in 2025-Q4 though: 94,500 square feet under construction at the WaterSound Town Center and West Bay Center, about 76 percent pre-leased, plus the statement that inquiries from national and regional tenants keep coming in. Whether announcements were made outside the calls cannot be judged from the four transcripts - so the commitment is neither demonstrably met nor demonstrably missed. open
  • 2025-Q3 — After the first third-party valuation range for the operating properties, a comparable approach for the land and timber holdings is being worked on and is described as in process. The valuation was announced without a date and explicitly as work over a longer period. The 2025-Q4 call brought a question about value per undeveloped acre; the CEO pointed to existing tables and the absence of a single headline number without mentioning the valuation. The topic did not appear in 2026-Q1. The established venue for such disclosures is the annual meeting - where the company first showed a third-party valuation of its operating properties in May 2025; the next one was scheduled for 12 May 2026 and falls after the last call reviewed. open
  • 2025-Q2 — Construction of the marina on the Intracoastal Waterway has started; once all permits are in hand work will continue and the project will be completed. Three quarters later, in 2026-Q1, the status is almost word for word the same: work started, a couple of permits still outstanding, then work will accelerate; the CEO sees no major regulatory hurdles, calling it a process. A questioner in 2026-Q1 noted the project had been at various stages of progress for over half a decade. No date was given in any of the four calls, and none was ever promised. open
  • 2025-Q4 — Announced for 2026: groundbreaking on two more detailed area plans, roughly 54,000 square feet of new commercial space at the WaterSound Town Center and West Bay Center, a new apartment complex and several new commercial ground leases. The 2026-Q1 call reported the PulteGroup contract and a long-range water and sewer agreement for the Lake Powell and West Laird plans, with infrastructure work due to start later in the year. The 54,000 square feet of commercial space and the new apartment complex were not mentioned in 2026-Q1. The year is still running, so the commitment is neither met nor missed. open

Based on public earnings call transcripts. Reviewed: 4 transcripts 2025-Q2 through 2026-Q1.

Growth

Growth Score

Ten checks against the annual reports — each one passed counts a point.

8 of 10 Growth gem
  • Revenue grows by more than 15% a year over three years 26.7%
  • More than 10% revenue growth is expected for the coming year no data
  • Share count grows by less than 3% a year -0.6%
  • Revenue growth plus cash-flow margin add up to at least 40 ("Rule of 40") 63.8%
  • Gross margin at 40% or higher and without meaningful erosion 93.0%
  • Goodwill from acquisitions does not grow faster than revenue 0.0%
  • Net debt below twice EBITDA 1.6 x EBITDA
  • Operating cash flow covers the profits of the last three years 135 m
  • Return on capital at 15% or higher, or up versus two years ago 10.2%
  • Insiders hold at least 10% or are net buyers 0.4%

A criterion without figures counts neither as passed nor as failed; a score is only produced from 7 judgeable criteria upwards. Source: fundamental data. All ten criteria in detail

Quality check

AAQS

6/10

The AAQS (AlleAktien Quality Score) checks 10 quality criteria on growth, profitability, and balance-sheet strength — per the methodology developed and published by AlleAktien, calculated by us from our own fundamental data. A stock counts as a quality stock from 9 out of 10 points. Where a company has a shorter listing history, we calculate over the fiscal years available (at least five).

  • Sales growth 10Y > 5% 20.5%
  • Exp. sales growth 3Y > 5%
  • EBIT growth 10Y > 5% 62.0%
  • Exp. EBIT growth 3Y > 5%
  • Net debt < 4x EBIT 3.0x
  • EBIT positive, 10Y straight 10
  • Max. EBIT decline < 50% 34.9%
  • Return on equity > 15% 15.1%
  • ROCE > 15% 10.2%
  • Expected return > 10%

View stocks with the full AAQS score · Read the methodology at AlleAktien

Source: fundamental data

The company

About the Company

The St. Joe Company ist gemeinsam mit ihren Tochtergesellschaften als Immobilienentwicklungs-, Vermögensverwaltungs- und Betreibergesellschaft in den USA tätig.

Employees
906
Headquarters
Panama City Beach, FL
Address
130 Richard Jackson Boulevard, 32407 Panama City Beach, United States
Phone
850 231 6400
Website
joe.com
IPO Date
03/10/1992
ISIN
US7901481009
Stock Split
3:1 on 01/13/1998
Stock Split
50:1 on 03/23/1990

Management

Management
Name Title Birth Year
Jorge Luis Gonzalez President, CEO, COO & Chairman of the Board 1965
Marek Bakun Executive VP & CFO 1972
K. Rhea Goff Senior VP, Chief Administrative Officer & Non-Independent Director 1981
Elizabeth J. Walters Esq., J.D. Senior VP, Chief Legal Officer & Secretary 1964
David S. Harrelson Senior Vice President of Timberland 1956
Patrick W. Murphy Senior Vice President of Hospitality 1971
Diane Hausler Senior Vice President
L. Park Brady Jr. Special Advisor 1948

Executives per the latest required filings; titles kept in their original language. Source: fundamental data.

Filings

Company Filings (8-K)

An 8-K is the filing a US company must use to disclose material events immediately — takeovers, changes at the top, major contracts or payment troubles, for instance. The links open the original document at the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

  • 07/29/2026 ST JOE Co (JOE): Results of Operations and Financial Condition; Other Events; Financial Statements and Exhibits SEC ↗

Data as of: September 18, 2026 · Source: fundamental data & SEC filings (annual and quarterly reports, 10-K/10-Q)

Note: pure fact-based analysis, not investment advice and not a solicitation to buy or sell. All figures without guarantee.

Was this page helpful to you?