TickerGuard
Buy Day today: Neutral (51) Mixed market breadth · no major macro event
EVR

Evercore Partners Inc

Financial Services · Capital Markets · listed since 2006

262.60$ +0.0% vs. previous close Closing price · As of: Sep 18, 2026
🔔 Watch stock
Add to watchlist

Stock Watch

Stock Watch will tell you what changes at Evercore Partners Inc.

Later $1 a month per stock — signing up is free, and you'll be the first to know when it launches.

Price history

Chart

Interactive price chart (TradingView).

52-week range: 261.80 $ to 383.10 $ · Last price: 262.60 $ (As of: September 18, 2026)

Key figures

Key figures at a glance

Every figure we hold for this stock, grouped by topic. The question mark next to a label explains what the number means.

Basics

Market Cap ?The value of the entire company on the market: share price times total shares outstanding. 10.2$B
Shares Outstanding ?Total number of shares issued. Price times share count gives market cap. 39m
Float ?Share of stock freely tradable on the market — not locked up in the hands of founders, insiders, or major shareholders. 94.7%
Beta ?Volatility versus the overall market: 1 = moves like the market, 2 = twice as much, under 1 = calmer than the market. 1.5

Performance

Perf. 1M ?Price performance over the last month. -3.30%
Perf. 3M ?Price performance over the last 3 months. 20.30%
Perf. 6M ?Price performance over the last 6 months. -4.00%
YTD Performance (%) ?Price performance since the start of the year (Year to Date). 8.30%
52-Week-High Distance ?How far the price sits below its highest point over the last 52 weeks. 0% means the stock is at its year high. -10.7%
Perf. 1Y ?Price performance over the last 12 months. -23.79%
Perf. 3Y ?Price performance over the last 3 years. 88.67%
Perf. 5Y ?Price performance over the last 5 years. 107.72%
Perf. 10Y ?Price performance over the last 10 years. 532.92%
Perf. Since Inception ?Price performance since the first available trading day (08/11/2006) — with a complete history, that is since the IPO. 1,556.83%

Technical Indicators

MA 38 Days ?Moving average of the last 38 trading days: the smoothed price path. A price above it signals short-term strength. 297.90$
MA 50 Days ?Moving average of the last 50 trading days — the most widely watched medium-term trend line. 308.00$
MA 200 Days ?Moving average of the last 200 trading days — the dividing line between a long-term uptrend and downtrend. 328.70$
RSI (14) ?Relative Strength Index over 14 days, scale 0 to 100: above 70 counts as overbought, below 30 as oversold. A hint on timing, not a verdict on the company. 25.8
Volatility 30 Days ?Price swings over the last 30 trading days, annualized. The higher the value, the more the price fluctuates. 27.9%
Volatility 250 Days ?Price swings over the last 250 trading days (roughly one market year), annualized. 38.2%

Calculated from the price history · as of 09/18/2026

Valuation

P/E ?Price-to-earnings ratio: how many years of profit does the stock cost? The lower, the cheaper the valuation. No earnings means no P/E. 14.5
Forward P/E ?P/E based on expected earnings for the next 12 months instead of past earnings — analysts' bet on the future. 12.9
PEG ?P/E divided by expected earnings growth: puts valuation in relation to growth. Around 1 is considered fair, well above that is pricey. 1.2
P/B ?Price-to-book ratio: market value relative to book equity. 5.6
P/S ?Price-to-sales ratio: market value divided by annual sales. Important for companies that aren't (yet) profitable. 2.1
EV/EBITDA ?Enterprise value including debt (EV) relative to operating profit before depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) — more comparable than P/E because debt counts too. Extreme values arise when EBITDA is near zero. 6.3
Price/FCF ?Market value divided by free cash flow: how many years of freely available cash does the stock cost? More honest than P/E because cash flow is harder to dress up. 6.2

Profitability

Gross Margin ?Gross margin: what's left of sales after only direct production costs are deducted — the product's pricing power. 93.9%
EBIT Margin ?EBIT margin: operating profit as a percentage of sales — the earning power of the core business before interest and taxes. 24.4%
Net Margin ?Net margin: what's left of sales as profit after ALL costs, interest, and taxes. 15.8%
Return on Equity ?Return on equity: how much profit does the company generate per year on shareholders' equity? 42.2%
Return on Assets ?Return on assets: how much profit the company generates from its total assets (equity and debt combined). 19.3%

Balance Sheet & Safety

Equity Ratio ?Equity ratio: equity as a share of total assets. The higher, the more resilient the balance sheet. 41.3%
Debt/Equity ?Leverage ratio: financial debt divided by equity. Under 1 is generally seen as solid; negative values mean negative equity. 0.7
Altman Z″ ?Edward Altman's bankruptcy early-warning score. We use the Z″ variant, built from four balance-sheet ratios — it is designed for service companies and non-manufacturers and uses book value instead of market value. On that scale: below 1.1 = danger zone, 2.6 and up = safe zone, in between a grey area. Because the classic Altman Z is calculated differently, the two numbers are not directly comparable. The formula does not fit banks, insurers, or real-estate stocks. 11.05
Piotroski ?Balance-sheet health check by Joseph Piotroski: 9 yes/no criteria on profit, cash flow, leverage, and efficiency. 7+ is very solid, under 3 is a red flag. 7 out of 9

Growth

Sales Growth Last Quarter ?Sales growth in the most recently reported quarter versus the same quarter a year ago (YoY). 100.30%
EPS Growth Last Quarter ?Growth in earnings per share in the most recently reported quarter versus the same quarter a year ago (YoY). 106.90%
Sales Growth (Year) ?Sales growth in the last fiscal year versus the year before. 29.49%
Forward Sales Growth ?Sales growth analysts expect over the next 12 months — an estimate, not a guarantee. 13.54%
Forward EPS Growth ?Earnings-per-share growth analysts expect over the next 12 months — an estimate, not a guarantee. 19.70%

Dividend

Dividend Yield ?Annual dividend divided by the current price: what percentage of your investment comes back as a payout each year. 1.29%
Dividend Per Share (TTM) ?Sum of dividends paid per share over the last 12 months. 3.41$
Payout Ratio ?Share of profit paid out as dividends. Over 100% means the company is paying out more than it earns — not sustainable long-term. 18.2%
Years Without a Cut ?How many years in a row the dividend hasn't been cut — a measure of reliability. 18Years
Increase Streak ?How many years in a row the dividend has been raised — the gold standard for dividend payers. 18Years

Quality & Screener

Stage ?Weinstein phases 1 through 4: 1 = basing, 2 = uptrend (the only buy phase), 3 = topping, 4 = downtrend. Measured against the 30-week line. 2
RS Rating ?Relative strength from 1 to 99: an RS of 95 means the stock has outperformed 95% of all stocks. 70
EPS Rating ?Earnings growth rating from 1 to 99 versus all stocks — high values mean above-average earnings growth. 86
Fundamental Rating ?Our own Fundamental Rating: 0 to 100 points with an A+ to F grade. 50 points is the average across the universe, 100 the best possible score. It scores growth, earnings surprises, analyst estimates, margins, cash flow, and balance-sheet safety — every stock percentile-ranked against all others. Grades: A+ from 95, A from 75, B from 55, C from 45, D from 25, E from 5, F below. B (72 out of 100)

Comparison

Industry comparison

The stock alongside the largest companies in the same group. The median row is the middle value of the companies shown above — not of the whole industry.

Industry: Capital Markets

Industry comparison
Company Market cap ($B) P/E EV/EBITDA Gross Margin % EBIT Margin % Sales Growth (Year) % Perf. 1Y %
Evercore Partners Inc EVR 10.2 14.5 6.3 93.9 24.4 29.5 -23.8
Morgan Stanley MS 319.6 17.6 0.0 87.6 40.6 11.5 30.1
Goldman Sachs Group Inc GS 277.9 17.2 0.0 82.1 38.6 -1.4 19.4
Charles Schwab Corp SCHW 180.9 21.5 0.0 97.5 49.4 6.5 14.3
Interactive Brokers Group Inc IBKR 153.8 39.1 3.4 93.0 76.8 9.8 40.3
Robinhood Markets Inc HOOD 109.2 58.0 45.6 91.9 38.5 51.6 -0.9
Nomura Holdings Inc NMR 29.5 12.0 0.0 78.0 30.8 5.6 38.3
LPL Financial Holdings Inc LPLA 26.5 28.6 13.5 29.9 11.1 37.2 -1.5
Circle Internet Group, Inc. CRCL 24.9 45.7 22.0 6.5 63.9 -35.1
Median of companies shown 109.2 19.5 3.4 87.6 38.5 11.5 14.3

Based on the most recently reported figures. Only stocks from the same trading venue are lined up, so the market caps are counted in one currency. Compare in a chart →

Fiscal years

Annual Figures

Fiscal years from the audited annual reports, oldest first. EBIT is the operating profit before interest and taxes; total assets are everything the company owns.

Revenue, operating income and net income per fiscal year $M

Revenue Operating income Net income

2016 · Revenue: 1,457 $M 2016 · Operating income: 268 $M 2016 · Net income: 108 $M 2017 · Revenue: 1,724 $M 2017 · Operating income: 438 $M 2017 · Net income: 125 $M 2018 · Revenue: 2,082 $M 2018 · Operating income: 551 $M 2018 · Net income: 377 $M 2019 · Revenue: 2,029 $M 2019 · Operating income: 449 $M 2019 · Net income: 297 $M 2020 · Revenue: 2,285 $M 2020 · Operating income: 541 $M 2020 · Net income: 351 $M 2021 · Revenue: 3,307 $M 2021 · Operating income: 1,117 $M 2021 · Net income: 740 $M 2022 · Revenue: 2,779 $M 2022 · Operating income: 704 $M 2022 · Net income: 477 $M 2023 · Revenue: 2,443 $M 2023 · Operating income: 366 $M 2023 · Net income: 255 $M 2024 · Revenue: 2,996 $M 2024 · Operating income: 533 $M 2024 · Net income: 378 $M 2025 · Revenue: 3,880 $M 2025 · Operating income: 794 $M 2025 · Net income: 592 $M
2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Annual Figures
Fiscal Year Revenue ($M) EBIT ($M) Net Income ($M) EPS ($) Operating Cash Flow ($M) Equity ($M) Total Assets ($M)
2016 1,457 268 108 2.43 416 783 1,662
2017 1,724 438 125 2.80 517 796 1,585
2018 2,082 551 377 8.33 850 1,008 2,126
2019 2,029 449 297 6.89 505 870 2,599
2020 2,285 541 351 8.23 978 1,231 3,371
2021 3,307 1,117 740 17.08 1,385 1,320 3,803
2022 2,779 704 477 11.61 531 1,537 3,621
2023 2,443 366 255 6.37 458 1,577 3,703
2024 2,996 533 378 9.08 988 1,708 4,174
2025 3,880 794 592 13.34 1,256 2,032 5,358

Quarters

Quarterly Figures

Each bar is one quarter, the last one is the most recent. Use the switch to step through the individual figures.

Revenue & Profit

Cash Flow

Balance Sheet

Margins

Per Share

Click the chart or tab into it, then use ← and → to step through the periods.

None of the selected stocks reports this metric. Pick another metric or switch between annual and quarterly.

These companies report in different currencies — switch on “Indexed” or pick a margin for a fair comparison.

The figures could not be loaded right now.

Sales Per Quarter ($M)
2024: Q4 · 979.5 $M Q4 2025: Q1 · 699.0 $M Q1 2025: Q2 · 838.0 $M Q2 2025: Q3 · 1,046.0 $M Q3 2025: Q4 · 1,297.0 $M Q4 2026: Q1 · 1,400.5 $M Q1 2026: Q2 · 998.5 $M Q2

Source: fundamental data

Quarterly Figures
Quarter EPS (Earnings Per Share) EPS YoY (%) Sales ($M) Sales YoY (%) Net Margin (%) OCF ($M) FCF ($M)
2024: Q4 3.30 62.00 980 24.30 14.30 686 673
2025: Q1 3.48 66.60 699 19.50 20.90 -550 -569
2025: Q2 2.36 30.40 838 20.90 11.60 438 412
2025: Q3 3.45 85.10 1,046 41.70 13.80 561 542
2025: Q4 4.76 44.50 1,297 32.40 15.70 808 799
2026: Q1 7.20 107.10 1,401 100.30 21.50 -226 -229
2026: Q2 2.32 -1.70 999 19.20 9.50 526 526

What Do These Terms Mean?

EPS (Earnings Per Share):
Quarterly profit divided by the total share count — how much of the profit works out to a single share.
YoY (Year over Year):
Change versus the same quarter a year ago — this is how you compare without seasonal distortion (e.g. the holiday shopping season).
Sales:
All revenue for the quarter, before any costs are deducted — the top line of the income statement.
Net Margin:
What percentage of sales is left over as profit in the end. Negative means the company is posting a loss.
OCF (Operating Cash Flow):
The cash that actually flows into the till from the core business during the quarter — harder to dress up than book profit.
FCF (Free Cash Flow):
Operating cash flow minus capital expenditures — the money that's genuinely free to use, say for paying down debt, buybacks, or dividends.

Compare with other stocks →

Screening

Appears in These Scanners

This stock currently matches 14 of our scanner strategies — each hit links to the scanner.

Backtested Scanners

Growth

Quality & Balance Sheet

Aktien.Guide

Breakout & Setup

Momentum & Trend

Value & GARP

Only genuine hits from verified scanners count; pure ranking metrics (P/E, P/S, and similar, which just sort the whole universe) don't count as a hit. View all scanners

Outlook

Analysts & Price Target

Combined picture of the price targets and recommendations of every analyst covering the stock. Price targets are expectations for the next 12 months, not promises — and they often follow the price rather than predict it.

Consensus Sell 1 = Strong buy … 5 = Strong sell
Analyst Ratings 11
Price Target (average) 363.90$
Distance to price 38.6% The price target sits 38.6% above the current price.

Distribution of Recommendations

Strong Buy 5
Buy 1
Hold 5
Sell 0
Strong Sell 0

Estimates by Fiscal Year

Estimates by Fiscal Year
Fiscal Year EPS Estimate ($) EPS Range ($) Revenue Estimate ($M) Expected Growth Analysts
12/31/2026 19.54 18.65 – 21.02 4,854 34.2% 10
12/31/2027 22.58 19.75 – 26.87 5,468 15.6% 10

Average of the analyst estimates for the coming fiscal years. The range shows how far the most optimistic and the most cautious estimate sit apart — the wider it is, the less certain the expectation.

Valuation

What is priced in?

Instead of guessing what the stock is worth, we turn the question around: what free cash flow growth has to happen for today’s market value to add up? The assumptions behind it can be moved.

Today’s market value implies roughly -8.7% growth in free cash flow per year over ten years (assumptions: discount rate 10.0%, terminal growth 2.5%).

What is priced in?
Free cash flow (last twelve months) $1.63B
Market cap $10.16B
Free cash flow in year ten $654.7M
Terminal value as a share of market value 34.0%

For comparison: over the past five years free cash flow grew by 5.0% per year.

It shows which assumption is built into today’s price, not whether that assumption will hold. Every assumption can be changed with the sliders; the figures move with them.

A simplified model calculation — not a forecast and not a recommendation.

AI classification

AI Rating

Neutral

Evercore erwähnt künstliche Intelligenz in den geprüften Berichten ausschließlich als Risikofaktor — als Verstärker von Cyber-, Betrugs- und Betriebsrisiken sowie als Risiko, das durch den KI-Einsatz Dritter zunimmt. Es gibt keine eigene KI-Anwendung im Kerngeschäft, kein KI-Produkt, keinen KI-bezogenen Umsatz und keine ausgewiesenen KI-Investitionen. Das Geschäftsmodell der unabhängigen Beratungsbank beruht auf 210 Senior Managing Directors und persönlichen Mandantenbeziehungen; KI spielt darin bislang keine ausgewiesene Rolle.

View the full file — quotes, sources, reviewed filings
„The increased use of mobile technologies, artificial intelligence and remote working arrangements heighten these and other operational risks."

Der zunehmende Einsatz mobiler Technologien, künstlicher Intelligenz und ortsunabhängiger Arbeitsformen verschärft diese und andere Betriebsrisiken.

10-K · 2026-02-20 · View SEC filing

„These risks may be exacerbated by the use of artificial intelligence. Phishing attacks and email spoofing attacks are becoming more prevalent and are often used to obtain information to impersonate employees or clients in order to, among other things, direct fraudulent bank transfers or obtain valuable information."

Diese Risiken können durch den Einsatz künstlicher Intelligenz verschärft werden. Phishing-Angriffe und gefälschte Absenderadressen nehmen zu und werden häufig genutzt, um Informationen zu erlangen und sich als Mitarbeiter oder Mandanten auszugeben — unter anderem, um betrügerische Überweisungen zu veranlassen oder an wertvolle Informationen zu gelangen.

10-K · 2026-02-20 · View SEC filing

„We are aware that there are risks presented by cybersecurity, including how those risks may increase with the use by others of artificial intelligence, and are committed to preventing and mitigating such risks by following the below framework."

Uns ist bewusst, dass von der Cybersicherheit Risiken ausgehen — auch dass diese Risiken durch den Einsatz künstlicher Intelligenz durch Dritte zunehmen können — und wir haben uns verpflichtet, solche Risiken anhand des nachfolgenden Rahmenwerks zu verhindern und abzumildern.

10-K · 2026-02-20 · View SEC filing

Filings Reviewed: 10-Q 2026-05-06 · 10-K 2026-02-20 · 10-Q 2025-11-05 · 10-Q 2025-08-07 · 10-Q 2025-05-08 · 10-K 2025-02-21

Rated on July 28, 2026 · How the Rating Is Built

Earnings calls

What the Earnings Calls Reveal

Across ten calls from 2024-Q1 through 2026-Q2, Evercore promised nothing it did not subsequently deliver: revenues rose from about 3.0 billion dollars in 2024 to 3.9 billion in 2025, the compensation ratio fell every year as signalled, the Robey Warshaw acquisition closed exactly on the stated date, and the pledge to repurchase more shares than are issued through bonuses has now held for six straight years. We found no broken commitment and no contradiction between calls. Something else stands out: on the most frequently asked analyst question - whether the compensation ratio will ever return below 60 percent - five calls since 2024-Q2 have produced no figure and no timeframe, only the answer that it will take a while. And on the non-compensation side, the 2026 goal has quietly slipped from further improvement to roughly last year's level.

Unremarkable Delivers, target unnamed 10 calls reviewed, 2024-Q1 through 2026-Q2 · As of August 2, 2026

Compensation ratio: delivered, yet the target has gone unanswered for five calls

The core analyst question since 2024-Q2 has been whether Evercore will ever bring its compensation ratio back to the historical level below 60 percent. It was asked in 2024-Q2, 2024-Q3, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3 and 2026-Q1 - and never once answered with a figure or a timeframe. The replies range from it being premature to speculate (2024-Q2) to there being no quick return to those levels (2025-Q3) to being still a ways from sub-60 and being invited to ask again at the end of next year (2026-Q1). In 2025-Q3 an analyst said plainly that market models underwrite ratios in the low 60s and asked whether they needed re-underwriting - again without a commitment. Delivery, by contrast, has been real: 67.6 percent (2023), 65.7 (2024), 64.2 (2025), 63.5 in the second quarter of 2026. The CFO himself flagged in 2026-Q1 that the pace of improvement will slow.

Non-compensation costs: further improvement quietly became roughly flat for 2026

From 2024-Q1 onwards the message was that the non-compensation ratio would improve over the near to medium term - and it did: 16.6 percent (2023), 15.7 (2024), 14.2 (2025). For 2026 that message shifted in two steps. In 2026-Q1 management still expected non-compensation costs to grow at a rate similar to the prior two years (up 16 and 17 percent respectively). One quarter later, in 2026-Q2, this became a modestly higher growth rate, and the full-year goal is now explicitly only to hold the ratio approximately in line with last year - that is, 14.2 percent rather than further progress. In the quarter itself the ratio jumped to 17.5 percent, which the CFO called unsatisfactory. Asked to quantify the one-off items, he gave no figure, only that they add up into the double-digit millions. Among them, mentioned but never sized, was a provision for credit losses - a notable item at an advisory firm, and one that surfaced only because an analyst asked.

Management's near-term outlook is systematically too low

Three times in two years management materially underestimated its own next quarter. In 2025-Q1 the CFO said the second and third quarters of 2025 would be hit by market volatility - both turned out to be records (up 21 and 42 percent year over year). In 2025-Q3 he warned that the usual strong fourth-quarter seasonality would be less pronounced this time - the fourth quarter of 2025, at about 1.3 billion dollars, became the best quarter in the firm's history. In 2026-Q1 the message was that the second quarter of 2026 would be closer to the year-earlier quarter (839 million dollars) - it came in at roughly 1.0 billion, some 19 percent higher. This is the opposite of talking a book. For investors it still means one thing: this firm's statements about the immediately following quarter work as a floor, not as an estimate.

Metrics turning fuzzier: the diversification share and the margin yardstick

The share of revenues outside the merger business was the showcase number in 2025: more than 50 percent in the quarter (2025-Q1), roughly 50 percent (2025-Q2), about 45 percent in the quarter and 50 percent over twelve months (2025-Q3), about 45 percent (2025-Q4). In 2026-Q1 it is missing from the prepared remarks entirely and appears only in reply to an analyst as around 45-ish, still over 40 percent. In 2026-Q2 all that remains is more than 40 percent over the last twelve months - the quarterly figure replaced by the smoothed trailing one. The decline itself is explainable and was even pre-announced in 2025-Q3. A second shift fits the pattern: in 2026-Q2 an analyst put it to the CFO that operating margins ran mostly between 26 and 28.5 percent from 2016 to 2022 against 22.7 percent in the current first half. The answer promptly reset the historical yardstick lower, to a range of 24.5 to 25 percent.

The sponsor recovery has been announced since 2024-Q1 and had still not arrived by 2026

As early as 2024-Q1 the message was that sponsor activity would pick up, with 3.8 trillion dollars of dry powder and an intensity not seen for some time. In 2024-Q3 an analyst pushed back that activity was not materialising at the expected velocity - the answer being that revenues would only show up in 2025. In 2025-Q1 the number of transactions actually fell. For full-year 2025 the segment was up 43 percent by dollar volume industry-wide but only 14 percent by deal count. In 2026-Q1 the CEO conceded under questioning that the middle market was not nearly as buoyant as hoped at the start of the year, and in 2026-Q2 middle market and sponsor activity are still described as below historical averages. The admission was open and given on request, but the forecast itself was pushed out by one or two quarters again and again for nine quarters running.

What was demonstrably kept: capital return, deal timetable, hiring through the cycle

The credit side is unusually clean. The pledge to repurchase more shares each year than are issued in the bonus round was confirmed in 2024-Q4 (fourth year), 2025-Q4 (fifth year) and 2026-Q1 (sixth year). The Robey Warshaw acquisition announced in 2025-Q2 was to close around the beginning of the fourth quarter and closed on 1 October 2025; the promised offset of the shares issued for it was, per 2025-Q4, completed not only for 2025 but for 2026 as well. The 2024 pledge to push the full-year non-compensation ratio below pre-COVID levels was met in 2024-Q4 at 15.7 percent against more than 17 percent. And the commitment made in the crisis quarter 2025-Q1 to keep investing in talent through the cycle produced the largest external hiring class in the firm's history in 2025; the number of senior managing directors rose from 144 at the end of 2024 to 188 by 2026-Q2.

Management promises

  • 2024-Q1 — The full-year 2024 non-compensation expense ratio to match or compare favorably to pre-COVID levels. Repeated verbatim in 2024-Q2 and delivered in 2024-Q4: 15.7 percent for the year against a pre-COVID level above 17 percent. 2025 then came in at 14.2 percent. kept
  • 2024-Q4 — The compensation ratio to show meaningful improvement again in 2025, after 190 basis points in 2024. Delivered despite the caveat in 2025-Q1 that it might prove harder in the current environment: 64.2 percent for 2025 after 65.7 percent, or 150 basis points. For 2026, management explicitly flagged a much smaller step in 2026-Q1. kept
  • 2025-Q3 — The full-year 2025 compensation ratio to land generally in line with the third quarter (65 percent), which mathematically requires a lower fourth quarter. Beaten: the fourth quarter of 2025 came in at 62 percent and the full year at 64.2 percent - better than the bar management set itself. kept
  • 2025-Q2 — The Robey Warshaw acquisition to close around the beginning of the fourth quarter of 2025. Closed on 1 October 2025, confirmed in 2025-Q3. In 2026-Q2 the CEO reported a smooth integration and several joint mandates. kept
  • 2025-Q2 — Shares issued for Robey Warshaw to be offset by additional buybacks, so that shareholders can treat the deal as largely cash. Confirmed for the first tranche in 2025-Q3 and, per 2025-Q4, already completed in advance for the second tranche due in 2026 - faster than promised. kept
  • 2024-Q4 — In 2025 as well, more shares to be repurchased than are issued through the annual bonus round. Confirmed in 2025-Q4 as the fifth consecutive year and in 2026-Q1 as the sixth. 812 million dollars went back to shareholders in 2025, and 823 million in the first half of 2026 alone. kept
  • 2024-Q3 — In equity underwriting Evercore aims to break into the top 10, saying it currently ranks around 11. Not a single interim update on that ranking was given across the following nine calls. In 2026-Q2 it is still described as an aspiration - though the business is strong: a record quarter of 97 million dollars, up 201 percent year over year. open
  • 2026-Q2 — The full-year 2026 non-compensation ratio to land approximately in line with last year's 14.2 percent, even though costs are growing faster than recently. After 13.5 percent in the first half and 17.5 percent in the second quarter alone, this is verifiable but ambitious. It is also the quietest target revision across the ten calls: the further progress promised since 2024 has become holding last year's level. open

Based on public earnings call transcripts. Reviewed: 10 transcripts 2024-Q1 through 2026-Q2.

Growth

Growth Score

Ten checks against the annual reports — each one passed counts a point.

7 of 10 Solid growth
  • Revenue grows by more than 15% a year over three years 11.8%
  • More than 10% revenue growth is expected for the coming year 13.5%
  • Share count grows by less than 3% a year 2.7%
  • Revenue growth plus cash-flow margin add up to at least 40 ("Rule of 40") 60.0%
  • Gross margin at 40% or higher and without meaningful erosion 99.4%
  • Goodwill from acquisitions does not grow faster than revenue 4.3%
  • Net debt below twice EBITDA 311 m net cash
  • Operating cash flow covers the profits of the last three years 1,477 m
  • Return on capital at 15% or higher, or up versus two years ago 15.9%
  • Insiders hold at least 10% or are net buyers 2.3%

A criterion without figures counts neither as passed nor as failed; a score is only produced from 7 judgeable criteria upwards. Source: fundamental data. All ten criteria in detail

Quality check

AAQS

9/10 Quality stock

The AAQS (AlleAktien Quality Score) checks 10 quality criteria on growth, profitability, and balance-sheet strength — per the methodology developed and published by AlleAktien, calculated by us from our own fundamental data. A stock counts as a quality stock from 9 out of 10 points. Where a company has a shorter listing history, we calculate over the fiscal years available (at least five).

  • Sales growth 10Y > 5% 11.5%
  • Exp. sales growth 3Y > 5% 18.7%
  • EBIT growth 10Y > 5% 12.8%
  • Exp. EBIT growth 3Y > 5% 30.1%
  • Net debt < 4x EBIT -0.4x
  • EBIT positive, 10Y straight 10
  • Max. EBIT decline < 50% 67.2%
  • Return on equity > 15% 33.4%
  • ROCE > 15% 15.8%
  • Expected return > 10% 45.3%

View stocks with the full AAQS score · Read the methodology at AlleAktien

Source: fundamental data

The company

About the Company

Evercore Inc. ist mit ihren Tochtergesellschaften eine unabhängige Investmentbank in Nord- und Südamerika, Europa, dem Nahen Osten, Afrika und dem asiatisch-pazifischen Raum.

Employees
2,715
Headquarters
New York, NY
Address
55 East 52nd Street, 10055 New York, United States
Phone
(212) 857-3100
IPO Date
08/11/2006
ISIN
US29977A1051

Management

Management
Name Title Birth Year
Roger Charles Altman Founder & Senior Chairman 1946
John S. Weinberg Chairman & CEO 1957
Timothy Gilbert LaLonde M.B.A., M.Sc. Senior MD & CFO 1962
Jason Klurfeld J.D. Senior MD, Corporate Secretary & General Counsel 1973
Matthew Lindsey-Clark Co-Head of EMEA Investment Banking, Global Adv. Europe & Sr. MD of Strategic Advisory of London 1963
Paul Pensa CPA Senior Managing Director, Chief Accounting Officer & Controller
David Kamo Senior MD of Strategic Advisory of New York & Senior MD in Investment Banking
Sandeep Saini Senior MD & Chief Information Officer
Katy Haber Senior MD, Head of Investor Relations & ESG
Jamie Easton Senior MD, Head of Communications & External Affairs 1979

Executives per the latest required filings; titles kept in their original language. Source: fundamental data.

Filings

Company Filings (8-K)

An 8-K is the filing a US company must use to disclose material events immediately — takeovers, changes at the top, major contracts or payment troubles, for instance. The links open the original document at the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

  • 07/29/2026 Evercore Inc. (EVR): Results of Operations and Financial Condition; Financial Statements and Exhibits SEC ↗

Data as of: September 18, 2026 · Source: fundamental data & SEC filings (annual and quarterly reports, 10-K/10-Q)

Note: pure fact-based analysis, not investment advice and not a solicitation to buy or sell. All figures without guarantee.

Was this page helpful to you?